Advertisement

Journal of Marine Science and Application

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 158–166 | Cite as

Numerical study of viscous wave-making resistance of ship navigation in still water

  • Ruosi Zha
  • Haixuan Ye
  • Zhirong Shen
  • Decheng Wan
Research Papers

Abstract

The prediction of a ship’s resistance especially the viscous wave-making resistance is an important issue in CFD applications. In this paper, the resistances of six ships from hull 1 to hull 6 with different hull forms advancing in still water are numerically studied using the solver naoe-FOAM-SJTU, which was developed based on the open source code package OpenFOAM. Different components of the resistances are computed and compared while considering two speed conditions (12 kn and 16 kn). The resistance of hull 3 is the smallest while that of hull 5 is the largest at the same speed. The results show hull 3 is a good reference for the design of similar ships, which can provide some valuable guidelines for hull form optimization.

Keywords

ship navigation CFD wave-making resistance viscous flow hull naoe-FOAM-SJTU solver OpenFOAM 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bal S (2008). Prediction of wave pattern and wave resistance of surface piercing bodies by a boundary element method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 56(3), 305–329.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton IE (1998). Comparison of SIMPLE and PISO type algorithms for transient flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 26(4), 459–483.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Cao HJ, Wan DC (2012). Numerical investigation of extreme wave effects on cylindrical offshore structures. Proceedings of the Twenty-second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Rhodes, Greece, 804–811.Google Scholar
  4. Cha JJ, Wan DC (2011). Numerical wave generation and absorption based on OpenFOAM. China Ocean Engineering, 29(3), 1–12.Google Scholar
  5. Dawson CW (1977). A practical computer method for solving ship-wave problems. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Berkeley, USA, 30–38.Google Scholar
  6. Donat R, Martinez-Gavara A (2011). Hybrid second order schemes for scalar balance laws. Journal of Scientific Computing, 48(1–3), 52–69.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Hänel D, Schwane R, Seider G (1987). On the accuracy of upwind schemes for the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA, Honolulu, USA, Paper 87-1104.Google Scholar
  8. Hino T, Martinelli L, Jameson A (1993). A finite-volume method with unstructured grid for free surface flow simulations. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Iowa City, USA, 173–193.Google Scholar
  9. ITTC Quality Manual (1999). Uncertainty analysis in CFD uncertainty assessment methodology. The 22nd ITTC, Seoul and Shanghai, Report No. 4.9-04-01-02Google Scholar
  10. Jasak H, Jemcov A, Tukovic Z (2007). OpenFOAM: A C++ library for complex physics simulations. International Workshop on Coupled Methods in Numerical Dynamics, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 1–20.Google Scholar
  11. Kim WJ, Van SH, Kim DH (2001). Measurement of flows around modern commercial ship models. Experiments in Fluids, 31(5), 567–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shen ZR, Jiang L, MIAO S, Wan DC (2011). RANS simulations of benchmark ships based on open source code. Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Ship Hydrodynamics, Shanghai, China, 76–82.Google Scholar
  13. Shen ZR, Cao HJ, Wan DC (2012). Manual of CFD solver for Ship and Ocean Engineering Flows: naoe-FOAM-SJTU. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, Technical Report No. 2012SR118110.Google Scholar
  14. Shen ZR, Wan DC (2013). RANS computations of added resistance and motions of a ship in head waves. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 23(4), 263–271.Google Scholar
  15. Simonsen CD, Otzen JF, Joncquez S (2013). EFD and CFD for KCS heaving and pitching in regular head waves. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 18(4), 435–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Weymouth GD, Wilson RV, Stern F (2005). Rans computational fluid dynamics predictions of pitch and heave ship motions in head seas. Journal of Ship Research, 49(2), 80–97.Google Scholar
  17. Ye HX, Shen ZR, Wan DC (2012). Numerical prediction of added resistance and vertical ship motions in regular head waves. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 11(4), 410–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruosi Zha
    • 1
  • Haixuan Ye
    • 1
  • Zhirong Shen
    • 1
  • Decheng Wan
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations