Advertisement

Spectra of seismic force reduction factors of MDOF systems normalized by two characteristic periods

  • Xiao Li
  • Genshu TongEmail author
  • Lei Zhang
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Seismic force reduction factor (SFRF) spectra of shear-type multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) structures are investigated. The modified Clough model, capable of considering the strength-degradation/hardening and stiffness-degradation, is adopted. The SFRF mean spectra using 102 earthquake records on a typical site soil type (type C) are constructed with the period abscissa being divided into three period ranges to maintain the peak features at the two site-specific characteristic periods. Based on a large number of results, it is found that the peak value of SFRF spectra may also exist for MDOF, induced by large high-mode contributions to elastic base shear, besides the mentioned two peak values. The variations of the stiffness ratio λk and the strength ratio λF of the top to bottom story are both considered. It is found that the SFRFs for λFλk are smaller than those for λF > λk. A SFRF modification factor for MDOF systems is proposed with respect to SDOF. It is found that this factor is significantly affected by the story number and ductility. With a specific λF (= λk0.75), SFRF mean spectra are constructed and simple solutions are presented for MDOF systems. For frames satisfying the strong column/weak beam requirement, an approximate treatment in the MDOF shear-beam model is to assign a post-limit stiffness 15%-35% of the initial stiffness to the hysteretic curve. SFRF spectra for MDOF systems with 0.2 and 0.3 times the post-limit stiffness are remarkably larger than those without post-limit stiffness. Thus, the findings that frames with beam hinges have smaller ductility demand are explained through the large post-limit stiffness.

Keywords

seismic force reduction factor multi-degree of freedom modified Clough model characteristic period highmode effect post-limit stiffness analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The study is financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant No. 2016YFC0701201.

References

  1. Ayoub A and Chenouda M (2009), “Resp onse Spectra of Degrading Structural Systems,” Engineering Structures, 31(7): 1393–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borzi B and Elnashai AS (2000), “Refined Force Reduction Factors for Seismic Design,” Engineering Structures, 22(10): 1244–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai J, Zhou J and Fang XD (2006), “Seismic Ductility Reduction Factors for Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems,” Advances in Structural Engineering, 9(5): 591–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chopra AK (1995), Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Clough RW and Penzien J (1975), Dynamics of Structures, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Daneshjoo F and Gerami M (2003), “Higher Mode Effects on Seismic Behavior of MDOF Steel Moment Resisting Frames,” Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 5(3): 41–54.Google Scholar
  7. GB 50011-2010 (2016), Code for Seismic Design of Buildings. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Gupta A and Krawinkler H (2000), “Behavior of Ductile SMRFS at Various Seismic Hazard Levels,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(1): 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Humar JL and Rahgozar MA (1996), “Application of Inelastic Response Spectral Derived from Seismic Hazard Spectral Ordinates for Canada,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(5): 1051–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ibarra LF and Krawinkler HA (2005), “Global Collapse of Frame Structures Under Seismic Excitations,” The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No.152.Google Scholar
  11. Lee LH, Han SW and Oh YH (1999), “Determination of Ductility Factor Considering Different Hysteretic Models,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28(9): 957–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Miranda E (1993a), “Evaluation of Site-Dependent Inelastic Seismic Design Spectra,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 119(5): 1319–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miranda E (1993b), “Site-Dependent Strength- Reduction Factors,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 119: 3503–3519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miranda E and Bertero V (1994), “Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake Resistant Design,” Earthquake Spectra, 10(2): 357–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moghaddam H and Mohannadi RK (2001), “Ductility Reduction Factor of MDOF Shear-Building Structures,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 5(3): 425–440.Google Scholar
  16. Nassar AA and Krawinkler H (1991), “Seismic Demands for SDOF and MDOF Systems,” John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  17. Qu H, Zhang J and Zhao JX (2011), “Strength Reduction Factors for Seismic Analyses of Buildings Exposed to Near-Fault Ground Motions,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 10(2): 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Santa-Ana FR (2004), “Estimation of Strength Reduction Factors for Elastoplastic Structures: Reduction Factors,” 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, No.126.Google Scholar
  19. Santa-Ana FR and Miranda E (2000), “Strength Reduction Factors for Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems,” 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, No. 1446.Google Scholar
  20. Seneviratna GDPK and Krawinkler H (1997), “Evaluation of Inelastic MDOF Effects for Seismic Design,” The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No.120.Google Scholar
  21. Tong GS, Ye Y and Zhang L (2013), “Seismic Force with Different Ductility Factor in Strength Degrading System,” Journal of Tongji University, 41(8): 1133–1139, 1157.Google Scholar
  22. Tong GS and Zhao YF (2007), “Seismic Force Reduction Factors for Modified-Clough Hysteretic Model,” Engineering Structures, 29(11): 3053–3070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tong GS and Zhao YF (2008), “Inelastic Yielding Strengt h Demand Coefficient Spectra,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28: 1004–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Veletsos AS and Vann WP (1971), “Response of Ground- Excited Elastoplastic Systems,” Journal of the Structural Division, 97(4): 1257–1281.Google Scholar
  25. Vidic T and Fajfar P (1994), “Consistent Inelastic Design Spectra: Strength and Displacement,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 23: 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhai CH, Wen WP, Li S and Xie LL (2015) “The Ductility- Based Strength Reduction Factor for the Mainshock–Aftershock Sequence-Type Ground Mtions,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(10): 2893–2914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhao YF and Tong GS (2009), “An Investigation of Characteristic Periods of Seismic Ground Motion,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 13: 540–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations