Evaluation of the fishbone model in simulating the seismic response of multistory reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames
- 17 Downloads
The fishbone model is a simplified numerical model for moment-resisting frames that is capable of modelling the effects of column-beam strength and stiffness ratios. The applicability of the fishbone model in simulating the seismic responses of reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames of different sets of column-beam strength and stiffness ratios are evaluated through nonlinear static, dynamic and incremental dynamic analysis on six prototype buildings of 4-, 8- and 12-stories. The results show that the fishbone model is practically accurate enough for reinforced concrete frames, although the assumption of equal joint rotation does not hold in all cases. In addition to the ground motion characteristics and the number of stories in the structures, the accuracy of the model also varies with the column-beam stiffness and strength ratios. The model performs better for strong column-weak beam frames, in which the lateral drift patterns are better controlled by the continuous stiffness provided by the strong columns. When the inelastic deformation is large, the accuracy of the model may be subjected to large record-to-record variability. This is especially the case for frames of weak columns.
Keywordsfishbone model reinforced concrete frame strong column-weak beam column-beam stiffness ratio incremental dynamic analysis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This study is jointly sponsored by programs of the Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (No. 2016A05, No. 2016A06) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51478441). The financial support is greatly appreciated.
- ASCE (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7–10, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
- EN1998-1 (2004), Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance–Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization.Google Scholar
- FEMA (2009), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, FEMA P695, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- FEMA (2012), Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, FEMA P58. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 2012.Google Scholar
- Guo ZH (1999), Theories of Reinforced Concrete, Beijing: Tsinghua University Press: 175–178. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- OpenSees (2006), Example 6. Generic 2D Frame, [last accessed: Dec. 5, 2017] http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/OpenSees_Example_6._generic_2D_Frame,_N-story_N-bay,_Reinforced-Concrete_Section_%26_Steel_W-Section
- Otani S (2004), “Japanese Seismic Design of High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings–an Example of Performance-based Design Code and State of Practices,” Proc. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No.5010.Google Scholar
- Qu Z, Ye LP and Wada A (2012), “Seismic Damage Mechanism Control of RC Ductile Frames: From a Stiffness Point of View,” Proc. 8th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan: 825–830.Google Scholar
- Shibata A (2010), Dynamic Analysis of Earthquake Resistant Structures, Tohoku University Press, Sendai, Japan.Google Scholar
- Wada A, Iwata M, Shimizu K, Abe S and Kawai H (1998), Damage Control-based Design of Buildings, Maruzen Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).Google Scholar
- GB 50011–2010 (2010), Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, Beijing. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Ye LP, Ma QL and Miao ZW (2009), “Study on Earthquake Intensities for Seismic Analysis of Structures,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 29(4): 9–22. (in Chinese)Google Scholar