Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 727–743 | Cite as

Small-scale multi-axial hybrid simulation of a shear-critical reinforced concrete frame

  • Vahid SadeghianEmail author
  • Oh-Sung Kwon
  • Frank Vecchio
Special Section: State-of-the-Art of Hybrid Testing Method


This study presents a numerical multi-scale simulation framework which is extended to accommodate hybrid simulation (numerical-experimental integration). The framework is enhanced with a standardized data exchange format and connected to a generalized controller interface program which facilitates communication with various types of laboratory equipment and testing configurations. A small-scale experimental program was conducted using a six degree-of-freedom hydraulic testing equipment to verify the proposed framework and provide additional data for small-scale testing of shearcritical reinforced concrete structures. The specimens were tested in a multi-axial hybrid simulation manner under a reversed cyclic loading condition simulating earthquake forces. The physical models were 1/3.23-scale representations of a beam and two columns. A mixed-type modelling technique was employed to analyze the remainder of the structures. The hybrid simulation results were compared against those obtained from a large-scale test and finite element analyses. The study found that if precautions are taken in preparing model materials and if the shear-related mechanisms are accurately considered in the numerical model, small-scale hybrid simulations can adequately simulate the behaviour of shear-critical structures. Although the findings of the study are promising, to draw general conclusions additional test data are required.


hybrid simulation small-scale testing reinforced concrete structures shear behaviour multi-scale modelling 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Collins MP and Kuchma D (1999), “How Safe Are Our Large, Lightly Reinforced Concrete Beams, Slabs, and Footings?” ACI Structural Journal, 96(4): 482–490.Google Scholar
  2. Collins MP, Vecchio FJ and Selby RG (1997), “The Failure of an Offshore Platform,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(3): 460–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Comité Euro-International du Béton (1990), CEB-FIP Model Code, Thomas Telford, London, UK.Google Scholar
  4. CSA Committee A23.3 (2014), Design of Concrete Structures, Canadian Standard Association, Rexdale, Ontario, Canada, 297 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Duong KV, Sheikh SA and Vecchio FJ (2007), “Seismic Behavior of Shear-Critical Reinforced Concrete Frame: Experimental Investigation,” ACI Structural Journal, 104(3): 303–310.Google Scholar
  6. Gencturk B and Hosseini F (2015), “Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete and Reinforced Engineered Cementitious Composite (ECC) Members and Structures using Small-Scale Testing,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 42(3): 164–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghorbani-Renani I, Velev N, Tremblay R, Palermo D, Massicotte B and Léger P (2009), “Modeling and Testing Influence of Scaling Effects on Inelastic Response of Shear Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, 106(3): 358–367.Google Scholar
  8. Guner S and Vecchio FJ (2011), “Analysis of Shear-Critical Reinforced Concrete Plane Frame Elements under Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 137(8): 834–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris HG and Sabnis GM (1999), Structural Modeling and Experimental Techniques, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hognestad E (1951), “A Study of Combined Bending and Axial Load in Reinforced Concrete Members,” Technical Report. No. 399, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Holub CJ (2009), Interaction of Variable Axial Load and Shear Effects in RC Bridges, PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Illinois, USA, 480 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Huang X, Sadeghian V and Kwon O (2015), “Development of Integrated Framework for Distributed Multi-Platform Simulation,” 6th International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Kim W, El-Attar A and White RN (1988), “Small-Scale Modelling Techniques for Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Loads,” Technical Report, No. NCEER-88-0041, University of Cornell, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Lu Y, Vintzileou E, Zhang G-F and Tassios TP (1999), “Reinforced Concrete Scaled Columns under Cyclic Actions,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 18(2): 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McDaniel C, Benzoni G and Priestley N (1997), “Scale Effects on the Shear Strength of Circular Reinforced Concrete Columns,” Technical Report, No. SSRP-97/02, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  16. Nakata N, Spencer BF and Elnashai AS (2010), “Sensitivity-Based External Calibration of Multiaxial Loading System,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 136(2): 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Noor FA and Wijayasri S (1982), “Modeling the Stress-Strain Relationship of Structural Concrete,” Magazine of Concrete Research, 34(118): 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ohtaki T (2000), “An Experimental Study on Scale Effects in Shear Failure of Reinforced Concrete Columns,” 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  19. Sadeghian V (2017), A Framework for Multi-Platform Analytical and Experimental Simulations of Reinforced Concrete Structures, PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 321 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Sadeghian V, Vecchio FJ (2016), “Application of Multiscale Modelling on Large Shear-Critical Reinforced Concrete Structural Systems Repaired with FRP Sheets,” Durability of Repairs Special Issue, Innovations in Corrosion and Materials Science Journal, 6(2): 106–114.Google Scholar
  21. Sadeghian V, Vecchio FJ and Kwon O-S (accepted for publication in 2017), “Modelling Beam-Membrane Interface in Reinforced Concrete Frames,” ACI Structural Journal.Google Scholar
  22. Sadeghian V, Vecchio FJ and Kwon O-S (under review) “A Multi-Platform Framework for Analytical and Experimental Simulation of Reinforced Concrete Structures,” ACI Structural Journal.Google Scholar
  23. Saouma V, Haussmann G, Kang D-H and Ghannoum W (2014), “Real-Time Hybrid Simulation of a Nonductile Reinforced Concrete Frame,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 140(2).Google Scholar
  24. Shioya T (1989), “Shear Properties of Large Reinforced Concrete Members,” Special Report, No. 25, Institute of Technology, Shimizu Corp., 198 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Vecchio FJ (2002), “Contribution of NLFEA to the Evaluation of Two Structural Concrete Failures,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, 16(3): 110–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wallace BJ and Krawinkler H (1985), “Small-Scale Model Experimentation on R/C Assemblies, USJapan Research Program,” Technical Report, No. 74, University of Stanford, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Wong PS, Vecchio FJ and Trommels H (2013), VecTor2 User’s Manual, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 347 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Zhan H and Kwon O-S (2015), “Actuator Controller Interface Program for Pseudodynamic Hybrid Simulation,” 15th Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Incheon, Korea.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations