Ground motion record simulation for structural analysis by consideration of spectral acceleration autocorrelation pattern
- 180 Downloads
A novel approach is introduced to generate simulated ground motion records by considering spectral acceleration correlations at multiple periods. Most of the current reliable Ground Motion Record (GMR) simulation procedures use a seismological model including source, path and site characteristics. However, the response spectrum of simulated GMR is somewhat different when compared with the response spectrum based on recorded GMRs. More specifically, the correlation between the spectral values at multiple periods is a characteristic of a record which is usually different between simulated and recorded GMRs. As this correlation has a significant influence on the structural response, it is needed to investigate the consistency of the simulated ground motions with actual records. This issue has been investigated in this study by incorporating an optimization algorithm within the Boore simulation technique. Eight seismological key parameters were optimized in order to achieve approximately the same correlation coefficients and spectral acceleration between two sets of real and simulated records. The results show that the acceleration response spectra of the synthetic ground motions also have good agreement with the real recorded response spectra by implementation of the proposed optimized values.
Keywordsstochastic method simulation ground motion random vibration site amplification EXSIM program
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aki K and Richards PG (1980), Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods, Vols. I&II, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 948.Google Scholar
- Beresnev I and Atkinson G (1997), “Modelling Finite Fault Radiation from the ωn Spectrum,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 87: 67–84.Google Scholar
- Bommer JJ and Acevedo AB (2004), “The Use of Real Earthquake Accelerograms as Input to Dynamic Analysis,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8: 43–91.Google Scholar
- Goldberg D (1989), Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.Google Scholar
- Holland HJ (1975), Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
- Kroittmaier J (1993), Optimizing Engineering Designs, McGraw-Hill, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Kutner M, Nachtsheim C and Neter J (2004), Applied Linear Regression Models, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, pp. 701.Google Scholar
- Tothong P (2007), “Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis Using Advanced Ground Motion Intensity Measures, Attenuation Relationships, and Near-fault Effects,” PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Wells DL and Coppersmith KJ (1994), “New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area and Surface Displacement,” Bulletin of Seismological society of America, 84: 974–1002.Google Scholar