Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 343–358 | Cite as

Earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings considering soil-structure interaction

  • Sadegh Naserkhaki
  • Farah N. A. Abdul Aziz
  • Hassan Pourmohammad
Article

Abstract

Many closely located adjacent buildings have suffered from pounding during past earthquakes because they vibrated out of phase. Furthermore, buildings are usually constructed on soil; hence, there are interactions between the buildings and the underlying soil that should also be considered. This paper examines both the interaction between adjacent buildings due to pounding and the interaction between the buildings through the soil as they affect the buildings’ seismic responses. The developed model consists of adjacent shear buildings resting on a discrete soil model and a linear viscoelastic contact force model that connects the buildings during pounding. The seismic responses of adjacent buildings due to ground accelerations are obtained for two conditions: fixed-based (FB) and structure-soil-structure interaction (SSSI). The results indicate that pounding worsens the buildings’ condition because their seismic responses are amplified after pounding. Moreover, the underlying soil negatively impacts the buildings’ seismic responses during pounding because the ratio of their seismic response under SSSI conditions with pounding to those without pounding is greater than that of the FB condition.

Keywords

adjacent buildings underlying soil pounding seismic response fixed-based (FB) structure-soil-structure interaction (SSSI) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anagnostopoulos SA (1988), “Pounding of Buildings in Series During Earthquakes,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 16: 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anagnostopoulos SA and Spiliopoulos KV (1992), “An Investigation of Earthquake Induced Pounding between Adjacent Buildings,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21: 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chouw N (2002), “Influence of Soil-structure Interaction on Pounding Response of Adjacent Buildings Due to Near-source Earthquakes,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, JSCE, 5: 543–553.Google Scholar
  4. Clough RW and Penzien J (2003), Dynamics of Structures, 3rd ed, Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, California, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Cole G, Dhakal R, Carr A and Bull D (2011), “An Investigation of the Effects of Mass Distribution on Pounding Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 40: 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. GRM (2008), 2008 Sichuan Earthquake Disaster Chronicle: Through the Eyes of the First Foreign Engineers Onsite, Global Risk Miyamoto, Sacramento, California, USA.Google Scholar
  7. GRM (2009), 2009 M6.3 L’Aquila, Italy, Earthquake Field Investigation Report, Global Risk Miyamoto, Sacramento, California, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Hao H and Gong L (2005), “Analysis of Coupled Lateral-torsional-pounding Responses of Onestorey Asymmetric Adjacent Structures Subjected to Bidirectional Ground Motions, Part II: Spatially Varying Ground Motion Input,” Advances in Structural Engineering, 8(5): 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hao H, Liu XY and Shen J (2000), “Pounding Response of Adjacent Buildings Subjected to Spatial Earthquake Ground Excitations,” Advances in Structural Engineering, 3(2): 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hao H and Shen J (2001), “Estimation of Relative Displacement of Two Adjacent Asymmetric Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30: 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. IBC (2009), International Building Code, International Code Council Inc., Country Club Hills, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  12. INBC (2005), Loading Chapter: Iranian National Building Code, Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran, Iran.Google Scholar
  13. Jankowski R (2005), “Non-linear Viscoelastic Modelling of Earthquake-induced Structural Pounding,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34: 595–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jankowski R (2008), “Earthquake Induced Pounding between Equal Height Buildings with Substantially Different Dynamic Properties,” Engineering Structures, 30: 2818–2829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeng V and Kasai K (1996), “Spectral Relative Motion of Two Structures Due to Seismic Travel Waves,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 122(10): 1128–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karayannis CG and Favvata MJ (2005), “Earthquake Induced Interaction between Adjacent Reinforced Concrete Structures with Non Equal Heights,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kasai K, Jagiasi AR and Jeng V (1996), “Inelastic Vibration Phase Theory for Seismic Pounding Mitigation,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 122(10): 1136–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kasai K and Maison BF (1997), “Building Pounding Damage during the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake,” Engineering Structures, 19(3): 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maison BF and Kasai K (1990), “Analysis for Type of Structural Pounding,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 116(4): 957–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maison BF and Kasai K (1992), “Dynamics of Pounding When Two Buildings Collide,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21: 771–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mulliken JS and Karabalis DL (1998), “Discrete Model for Dynamic Through the Soil Coupling of 3D Foundations and Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 27: 687–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muthukumar S and DesRoches R (2006), “A Hertz Contact Model with Non-linear Damping for Pounding Simulation,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35: 811–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Naserkhaki S (2011), Pounding of Adjacent Buildings Considering Soil Effects, MSc Thesis, University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  24. Naserkhaki S and Pourmohammad H (2011), “SSI And SSSI Effects in Seismic Analysis of Twin Buildings: Discrete Model Concept,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, In Press.Google Scholar
  25. Newmark NM (1959), “A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 85: 67–94.Google Scholar
  26. Nguyen DT, Noah ST and Kettleborough CF (1986), “Impact Behaviour of an Oscillator with Limiting Stops, Part I: a Parametric Study,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 109(2): 293–307.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Padron LA, Aznarez JJ and Maeso O (2009), “Dynamic Structure Soil Structure Interaction between Nearby Piled Buildings under Seismic Excitation by BEM-FEM Model,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29: 1084–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Papadrakakis M, Apostopoulou C, Zacharopoulos A and Bitzarakis S (1996), “Three Dimensional Simulation of Structural Pounding during Earthquakes,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 122(5): 423–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Polycarpou PC and Komodromos P (2010), “Earthquake Induced Poundings of a Seismically Isolated Building with Adjacent Structures,” Engineering Structures, 32: 1937–1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rahman AM, Carr AJ and Moss PJ (2001), “Seismic Pounding of a Case of Adjacent Multiple-story Building of Differing Total Heights Considering Soil Flexibility Effects,” Bulletin of New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering, 34(1): 40–59.Google Scholar
  31. Rajalingham C and Rakheja S (2000), “Analysis of Impact Force Variation During Collision of Two Bodies Using a Single Degree of Freedom System Model,” Journal of Sound and vibration, 229(4): 823–835.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosenblueth E and Meli R (1986), “The 1985 Earthquake: Causes and Effects in Mexico City,” Concrete International, ACI, 8(5): 23–36.Google Scholar
  33. Ruangrassamee A and Kawashima K (2003), “Control of Nonlinear Bridge Response with Pounding Effect by Variable Dampers,” Engineering Structures, 25: 593–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Savin E (2003), “Influence of Free Field Variability on Linear Soil-structure Interaction (SSI) by Indirect Integral Representation,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32: 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shakya K and Wijeyewickrema AC (2009), “Midcolumn Pounding of Multi-story Reinforced Concrete Buildings Considering Soil Effects,” Advances in Structural Engineering, 12(1): 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. TBC (1997), Seismic Provisions: Taiwan Building Code, Construction and Planning Administration Ministry of Interior, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  37. Wang YY (2008), “Lessons Learned from the “5·12” Wenchuan Earthquake: Evaluation of Earthquake Performance Objectives and the Importance of Seismic Conceptual Design Principles,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 7(3): 255–262.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang LX, Chau KT and Wei XX (2009), “Numerical Simulations of Nonlinear Seismic Torsional Pounding between Two Single-story Structures,” Advances in Structural Engineering, 12(1): 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ye K, Li L and Zhu Hongping (2009), “A Modified Kelvin Impact Model for Pounding Simulation of Baseisolated Building with Adjacent Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 8(3): 433–446.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhu P, Abe M and Fujino Y (2002), “Modelling Three-dimensional Non-linear Seismic Performance of Elevated Bridges with Emphasis on Pounding of Girders,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31: 1891–1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sadegh Naserkhaki
    • 1
  • Farah N. A. Abdul Aziz
    • 1
  • Hassan Pourmohammad
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringIslamic Azad University, Karaj BranchKarajIran

Personalised recommendations