Uncertainty analysis of strain modal parameters by Bayesian method using frequency response function
Structural strain modes are able to detect changes in local structural performance, but errors are inevitably intermixed in the measured data. In this paper, strain modal parameters are considered as random variables, and their uncertainty is analyzed by a Bayesian method based on the structural frequency response function (FRF). The estimates of strain modal parameters with maximal posterior probability are determined. Several independent measurements of the FRF of a four-story reinforced concrete frame structural model were performed in the laboratory. The ability to identify the stiffness change in a concrete column using the strain mode was verified. It is shown that the uncertainty of the natural frequency is very small. Compared with the displacement mode shape, the variations of strain mode shapes at each point are quite different. The damping ratios are more affected by the types of test systems. Except for the case where a high order strain mode does not identify local damage, the first order strain mode can provide an exact indication of the damage location.
Keywordsfrequency response function uncertainty strain mode Bayesian method local damage damage detection concrete frame
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Beck JL and Katafygiotis LS (1998), “Updating Models and Their Uncertainties I: Bayesian Statistical Framework,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 24(4): 455–461.Google Scholar
- Doebling SW and Farrar CR (2000), “Estimation of Statistical Distributions For Modal Parameters Identified From Averaged Frequency Response Function Data,” Los Alamos National Laboratory, www.lanl.com.Google Scholar
- Doebling SW, Farrar CR and Goodman RS (1997), “Effects of Measurement Statistics on the Detection of Damage in the Alamosa Canyon Bridge,” Los Alamos National Laboratory, www.lanl.com.Google Scholar
- Dong Cong (2001), The Theory and Application of Present-day Structure System Reliability, Science Press, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Fu Zhifang and Hua Hongxing (2000), Modal Analysis Theory and Practice, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai, China. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Herlufser H (1984), Dual Channel FFT Analysis (Part II), Technical Review No.2. Denmark: Brüel & Kjær.Google Scholar
- Paez TL and Hunter NF (1998). “Statistical Series: Part-5: Fundamental-concepts of the Bootstrap for Statistical Analysis of Mechanical Systems,” Experimental Techniques, 22(3):35–38.Google Scholar
- Wang Baisheng, Ni YQ and Ko JM (2001), “Numerical Study of Damage Localization for TSING MA Bridge Deck,” China Civil Engineering Journal, 34(3): 67–73. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Yao GC, Chang KC and Lee GC (1992), “Damage Diagnosis of Steel Frames Using Vibrational Signature Analysis,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 118(9):1949–1961.Google Scholar
- Yi Weijian, Wu Gaolie and Xu Li (2006), “A Study on the Uncertainty of Model Parameters by Bayesian Method,” Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 23(6): 700–705. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhou Xianyan and Shen Pusheng (1997), “Study of Damage Assessment of Concrete Structures by Strain Model Method,” Journal of Hunan University (Natural Science), 24(5): 69–74. (in Chinese)Google Scholar