Advertisement

Journal of Ocean University of China

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 232–240 | Cite as

The Effect of Bioturbation Activity of the Ark Clam Scapharca subcrenata on the Fluxes of Nutrient Exchange at the Sediment-Water Interface

  • Shuo Zhang
  • Xin Fang
  • Junbo ZhangEmail author
  • Fang Yin
  • Hu Zhang
  • Lizhen Wu
  • Daisuke Kitazawa
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Filter-feeding shellfish are common benthos and significantly affect the biogeochemical cycle in the shallow coastal ecosystems. Ark clam Scapharca subcrenata is one of the widely cultured bivalve species in many coastal areas owing to its tremendous economic value. However, there is little information regarding the effects of the bioturbation of S. subcrenata on the fluxes of nutrient exchange in the sediment-water interface (SWI). In this regard, S subcrenata was sampled during October 2016 to determine the effects of its bioturbation activity on the nutrient exchange flux of the SWI. The results showed that the biological activity of S. subcrenata could increase the diffusion depth and the rate of the nutrients exchange in the sediments. The bioturbation of S. subcrenata could allow the nutrients to permeate into the surface sediments at 6−10 cm and increase the release rate of nutrients at the SWI. The releasing fluxes of DIN and PO43−-P in the culture area were found to be around three times higher than that in the non-cultured region. The culture of S subcrenata has been proved to be an important contributor to nutrient exchange across the SWI in the farming area of Haizhou Bay. Nutrients exchange in the SWI contributes a part of 86% DIN, 71% PO43−-P and 18% SiO32−-Si for the aquaculture farm.

Key words

bioturbation nutrients exchange flux ark clam sediment-water interface 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the Young Orient Scholars Programme of Shanghai, the Doctoral Scientific Research Starting Foundation of Shanghai Ocean University, the Shanghai Special Research Fund for Training College’s Young Teachers, the Fund for Ministry of Agriculture Readjusting the Industrial Structure: Sea Farming Demonstration Project of Haizhou Bay in Jiangsu Province (Nos. D-8006-12-0018, D8006-15-8014), the Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest (No. 201303047). The authors would like to thank the Lianyungang City Oceanic and Fishery Administration for assisting with sample collection in Haizhou Bay.

References

  1. Aller, R. C., and Aller, J. Y., 1998. The effect of biogenic irrigation intensity and solute exchange on diagenetic reaction rates in marine sediments. Journal of Marine Research, 56 (4): 905–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartlett, R., Mortimer, R. J. G., and Morris, K., 2008. Anoxic nitrification: Evidence from humber estuary sediments. Chemical Geology, 250: 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bidle, K. D., and Azam, F., 2001. Bacterial control of silicon regeneration from diatom detritus: Significance of bacterial ectohydrolases and species identity. Limnology and Oceanography, 46: 1606–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bidle, K. D., Brzezinski, M. A., Long, R. A., Jones, J. L., and Farooq, A., 2003. Diminished efficiency in the oceanic silica pump caused by bacteria-mediated silica dissolution. Limnology and Oceanography, 48: 1855–1868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bostrom, B., Andersen, J. M., Siegfried, F., and Jansson, M., 1988. Exchange of phosphorus across the sediment water interface. Hydrobiologia, 170: 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boudreau, B. P., 1997. Diagenetic models and their implementation. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 15 (3): 279.Google Scholar
  7. Canfield, D. E., Jorgensen, B. B., Fossing, H., Glud, R., Gundersen, J., Ramsing, N. B., Thamdrup, B., Hansen, J. W., Nielsen, L. P., and Hall, P. O. J., 1993. Pathways of organic carbon oxidation in three continental margin sediments. Marine Geology, 113: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Couceiro, F., Fones, G. R., Thompson, C. E. L., Statham, P. J., Sivyer, D. B., Parker, R., Kelly-Gerreyn, B. A., and Amos, C. L., 2013. Impact of resuspension of cohesive sediments at the oyster grounds (North Sea) on nutrient exchange across the sediment-water interface. Biogeochemistry, 113: 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Creed, R. P., Taylor, A., and Pflaum, J. R., 2010. Bioturbation by a dominant detritivore in a headwater stream: Litter excavation and effects on community structure. Oikos, 119: 1870–1876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng, K., Liu, S. M., Zhang, G. L., Lu, X. L., and Zhang, J., 2012. Influence of Ruditapes philippinarum aquaculture on benthic fluxes of biogenic elements in Jiaozhou Bay. Environmental Science, 33: 782–793 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  11. Dixit, S., Cappellen, P. V., and Bennekom, A. J. V., 2001. Processes controlling solubility of biogenic silica and pore water build-up of silicic acid in marine sediments. Marine Chemistry, 73: 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dong, L. F., Smith, C. J., Papaspyrou, S., Stott, A., Osborn, A. M., and Nedwell, D. B., 2009. Changes in benthic denitrifica-tion, nitrate ammonification, and anammox process rates and nitrate and nitrite reductase gene abundances along an estua-rine nutrient gradient (the Colne Estuary, United Kingdom). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75: 3171–3179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Froelich, P. N., 1998. Kinetic control of dissolved phosphate in natural rivers and estuaries: A primer on the phosphate buffer mechanism. Limnology and Oceanography, 33: 649–668.Google Scholar
  14. Forrest, B. M., and Creese, R. G., 2006. Benthic impacts of in-tertidal oyster culture, with consideration of taxonomic sufficiency. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 112 (1–3): 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilbert, F., Hulth, S., Grossi, V., Poggiale, J., Desrosiers, G., Rosenberg, R., Gérino, M., François-Carcaillet, F., Michaud, E., and Stora, A., 2007. Sediment reworking by marine ben-thic species from the Gullmar Fjord (Western Sweden): Importance of faunal biovolume. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 348: 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gomez, E., Durillon, C., Rofes, G., and Pieot, B., 1999. Phosphate adsorption and release from sediments of brackish lagoons: pH, O2 and loading influence. Water Research, 33: 2437–2447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen, K., and Kristensen, E., 1997. Impact of macrofaunal recolonization on benthic metabolism and nutrient fluxes in a shallow marine sediment previously overgrown with macro-algal mats. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 45: 613–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hewitt, J., Thrush, S., Gibbs, M., Lohrer, D., and Norkko, A., 2006. Indirect effects of Atrina zelandica, on water column nitrogen and oxygen fluxes: The role of benthic macrofauna and microphytes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 330: 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Honda, H., and Kikuchi, K., 2002. Nitrogen budget of poly-chaete Perinereis nuntia vallata fed on the feces of Japanese flounder. Fisheries Science, 68: 1304–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang, S., Yang, Y., and Anderson, K., 2007. The complex effects of the invasive polychaetes Marenzelleria spp. on ben-thic nutrient dynamics. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 352 (1): 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hulth, S., Aller, R. C., Canfield, D. E., Dalsgaard, T., Engström, P., Gilbert, F., Sundbäck, K., and Thamdrup, B., 2005. Nitrogen removal in marine environments: Recent findings and future research challenges. Marine Chemistry, 94 (1–4): 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, S. E., and Jago, C. F., 1993. In situ assessment of modification of sediment properties by burrowing invertebrates. Marine Biology, 115 (1): 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karlson, K., Hulth, S., Ringdahl, K., and Rosenberg, R., 2005. Experimental recolonisation of Baltic Sea reduced sediments: Survival of benthic macrofauna and effects on nutrient cycling. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 294: 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kinoshita, K., Wada, M., Kogure, K., and Furota, T., 2003. Mud shrimp burrows as dynamic traps and processors of tidal-flat materials. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 247: 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koretsky, C. M., Meile, C., and Cappellen, P. V., 2002. Quantifying bioirrigation using ecological parameters: A stochastic approach. Geochemical Transactions, 3 (1): 17–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lijklema, L., 1994. Nutrient dynamics in shallow lakes: Effects of changes in loading and role of sediment-water interaction. Nutrient Dynamics and Biological Structure in Shallow Freshwater and Brackish Lakes, 94: 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayer, T. D., and Jarrell, W. M., 2000. Phosphorus sorption during iron (II) oxidation in the presence of dissolved silica. Water Research, 34: 3949–3956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Michaud, E., Desrosiers, G., Mermillod-Blondin, F., Sundby, B., and Stora, G., 2006. The functional group approach to biotur-bation: II. The effects of the Macoma balthica, community on fluxes of nutrients and dissolved organic carbon across the sediment — water interface. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 337 (2): 178–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mortimer, R. J. G., Davey, J. T., Krom, M. D., Watson, P. G., Frickers, P. E., and Clifton, R. J., 1999. The effect of macrofauna on porewater profiles and nutrient fluxes in the intertidal zone of the Humber Estuary. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 48 (6): 683–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Musale, A. S., and Desai, D. V., 2011. Distribution and abundance of macrobenthic polychaetes along the South Indian coast. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 178: 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nicholaus, R., and Zheng, Z., 2014. The effects of bioturbation by the Venus clam Cyclina sinensis on the fluxes of nutrients across the sediment-water interface in aquaculture ponds. Aquaculture International, 22: 913–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Niu, H. X., 2006. Application study on purification function of Gracilaria lichenoiides, Scapharca subcrenata and microbial products in the shrimp culture. PhD thesis. Ocean University of China (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  33. Nizzoli, D., Bartoli, M., Cooper, M., Welsh, D. T., Underwood, G. J. C., and Viaroli, P., 2007. Implications for oxygen, nutrient fluxes and denitrification rates during the early stage of sediment colonisation by the polychaete Nereis spp. in four estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 75: 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Norling, K., Rosenberg, R., Hulth, S., Grémare, A., and Bonsdorff, E., 2007. Importance of functional biodiversity and species-specific traits of benthic fauna for ecosystem functions in marine sediment. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 332: 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palmer, P. J., 2010. Polychaete-assisted sand filters. Aquaculture, 306: 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pelegrí, S. P., and Blackburn, T. H., 1994. Bioturbation effects of the amphipod Corophium volutator, on microbial nitrogen transformations in marine sediments. Marine Biology, 121: 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peña, M. A., Katsev, S., Oguz, T., and Gilbert, D., 2010. Modeling dissolved oxygen dynamics and hypoxia. Biogeosciences, 7: 933–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peter, S., and Dirk, D. B., 2006. Probing the microenvironment of freshwater sediment macrofauna: Implications of deposit-feeding and bioirrigation for nitrogen cycling. Limnology and Oceanography, 51 (6): 2538–2548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rowe, G. T., 1974. The effects of the benthic fauna on the physical properties of deep-sea sediments. Deep-Sea Sediments, 2: 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shen, L. W., You, Z. J., and Shi, X. Y., 2008. Study on size and salinity related oxygen consumption and ammonia excretion of Scapharca subcrenata Spat. Marine Fishery Research, 29: 53–56.Google Scholar
  41. Stockdale, A., Davison, W., and Hao, Z., 2009. Micro-scale biogeochemical heterogeneity in sediments: A review of available technology and observed evidence. Earth-Science Review, 92: 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Suzumura, M., Ueda, S., and Sumi, E., 2000. Control of phosphate concentration through adsorption and desorption processes in groundwater and seawater mixing at sandy beaches in Tokyo Bay, Japan. Journal of Oceanography, 56 (6): 667–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Volkenborn, N., Hedtkamp, S. I. C., Beusekom, J. E. E. V., and Reise, K., 2007. Effects of bioturbation and bioirrigation by lugworms (Arenicola marina) on physical and chemical sediment properties and implications for intertidal habitat succession. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 74: 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Widdows, J., Brinsley, M. D., Bowley, N., and Barrett, C., 1998. A benthic annular flume for in situ measurement of suspension feeding/biodeposition rates and erosion potential of in-tertidal cohesive sediments. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 46: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wolfrath, B., 1992. Burrowing of the fiddler crab Uca tangeri in the Ria Formosa in Portugal and its influence on sediment structure. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 85: 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu, S. J., 2010. Experimental study on the influence of tubificid Worms’-Bioturbation on pollutions releasing from the sediments of East Dongting Lake. PhD thesis. Changsha University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  47. Yang, X. G., 2015. Community structure of plankton in Haizhou Bay and adjacent waters and their relationships with environmental factors. PhD thesis. Ocean University of China (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ocean University of China, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuo Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xin Fang
    • 1
  • Junbo Zhang
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Fang Yin
    • 5
  • Hu Zhang
    • 6
  • Lizhen Wu
    • 7
  • Daisuke Kitazawa
    • 8
  1. 1.College of Marine SciencesShanghai Ocean UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Sustainable Exploitation of Oceanic Fisheries Resources, Ministry of EducationShanghai Ocean UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education (Shanghai Ocean University)ShanghaiChina
  4. 4.National Engineering Research Center for Oceanic FisheriesShanghai Ocean UniversityShanghaiChina
  5. 5.College of Ocean Science and EngineeringShanghai Maritime UniversityShanghaiChina
  6. 6.Maine Fisheries Research Institution of JiangsuNantongChina
  7. 7.Lianyungang City Oceanic and Fishery AdministrationLianyungangChina
  8. 8.Institute of Industrial ScienceThe University of TokyoKashiwaJapan

Personalised recommendations