Advertisement

Journal of Ocean University of China

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 193–202 | Cite as

Studies on Factors Influencing Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Plates Used in Artificial Reefs

  • Yanli Tang
  • Wenzhao Yang
  • Liyuan Sun
  • Fenfang Zhao
  • Xiangyu Long
  • Gang Wang
Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

As a simplified model of artificial reefs, a series of plate models punched with square or circular openings are designed to investigate the effects of openings on the hydrodynamic characteristics of artificial reefs. The models are grouped by various opening numbers and opening-area ratios. They are physically tested in a water flume or used in the numerical simulation to obtain the drag force in the uniform flow with different speeds. The simulation results are found in good agreement with the experimental measurements. By the non-dimensional analysis, the drag coefficient specified to each model is achieved and the effects of openings are examined. It is found that the key factor affecting the drag coefficient is the open-area ratio. Generally, the drag coefficient is a linear function of the open area ratio with a minus slope. The empirical formulae for the square and circular openings respectively are deduced by means of the multiple regression analysis based on the measured and numerical data. They will be good references for the design of new artificial reefs. As a result of numerical simulation, the vorticity contours and pressure distribution are also presented in this work to better understand the hydrodynamic characteristics of different models.

Key words

artificial reefs drag coefficient hydrodynamic characteristics model experiment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study is supported by Shandong Provincial Oceanic and Fishery Department (Ecological Simulation Test of the Offshore Area in Shandong Peninsula) and the Primary Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (Nos. 2016CYJS04A01 and 2017CXGC0107).

References

  1. ANSYS–Inc, 2013. ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Release 15.0.Google Scholar
  2. Antsulevich, A. E., 1994. Artificial reefs project for improvement of water quality and environmental enhancement of Neva Bay (St. Petersburg County region). Bulletin of Marine Science, 55 (2–3): 1189–1192.Google Scholar
  3. Cui, Y., Guan, C. T., Wan, R., Li, J., and Huang, B., 2009. Research and numerical simulation on features of flow field around artificial reefs. Journal of System Simulation, 21 (23): 7393–7396. DOI: 10.16182/j.cnki.joss.2009.23.007 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  4. Cui, Y., Guan, C. T., Wan, R., Li, J., and Huang, B., 2011. Numerical simulation on influence of disposal space on effects of flow field around artificial reefs. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 22 (2): 59–65 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  5. Jiang, Z. Y., Liang, Z. L., Zhu, L. X., and Liu, Y., 2016. Numerical simulation of effect of guide plate on flow field of artificial reef. Ocean Engineering, 116: 236–241. DOI: 10. 1016/j.oceaneng. 2016.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kageyama, Y., Osaka, H., Yamada, H., Hasegawa, H., and Nakakura, Y., 1981. Water tunnel visualization around the perforated cube: 1st report, flow visualization in a center plane. Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering Yamaguchi University, 31: 351–359 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  7. Kim, D., Woo, J., Yoon, H. S., and Na, W. B., 2014. Wake lengths and structural responses of Korean general artificial reefs. Ocean Engineering, 92: 83–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng. 2014.09.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim, D., Woo, J., Yoon, H. S., and Na, W. B., 2016. Efficiency, tranquillity and stability indices to evaluate performance in the artificial reef wake region. Ocean Engineering, 122: 253–261. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.06.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li, J., Zheng, Y. X., Gong, P. H., and Guan, C. T., 2017. Numerical simulation and PIV experimental study of the effect of fl ow fields around tube artificial reefs. Ocean Engineering, 134: 96–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.02.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu, J., Huang, H. L., Chen, S., Wu, Y., Li, L. Z., and Rao, X., 2014. Model test of the hydrodynamic characteristics of two vertical cambered V type otter boards. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 29 (2): 183–188. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn1000–4874.2014.02.007 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  11. Liu, J., Xu, L. X., Zhang, S., and Huang, H. L., 2011. Research on model experiments of the resistance coefficient of artificial reefs. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 41 (10): 35–39 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  12. Liu, T. L., and Su, D. T., 2013. Numerical analysis of the influence of reef arrangements on artificial reef flow fields. Ocean Engineering, 74 (6): 81–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng. 2013.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Dong, G., Guan, C., Cui, Y., and Xu, T. J., 2013. A study of the flow field characteristics around star–shaped artificial reefs. Journal of Fluids & Structures, 39 (5): 27–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.02.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mellibovsky, F., Prat, J., Notti, E., and Sala, A., 2015. Testing otter board hydrodynamic performances in wind tunnel facilities. Ocean Engineering, 104: 52–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocean eng.2015.04.064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nisugi, K., Hayase, T., and Shirai, A., 2004. Fundamental study of hybrid wind tunnel integrating numerical simulation and experiment in analysis of flow field. Jsme International Journal, 47 (3): 593–604. DOI: 10.1299/jsmeb.47.593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Profito, F. J., Giacopini, M., Zachariadis, D. C., and Dini, D., 2015. A general finite volume method for the solution of the Reynolds lubrication equation with a mass–conserving cavitation model. Tribology Letters, 60 (1): 18. DOI: 10.1007/s11249–015–0588–0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Relini, G., Relini, M., Palandri, G., Merello, S., and Beccornia, E., 2007. History, ecology and trends for artificial reefs of the Ligurian Sea, Italy. Hydrobiologia, 580 (1): 193–217. DOI: 10.1007/s10750–006–0453–0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ross, A. N., Arnold, S., Vosper, S. B., Mobbs, S., Dixon, N., and Robins, A. G., 2004. A comparison of wind–tunnel experiments and numerical simulations of neutral and stratified flow over a hill. Boundary–Layer Meteorol, 113 (3): 427–459. DOI: 10.1023/B:BOUN.0000045499.18839.7d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Su, D. T., Liu, T. L., and Ou, C. H., 2008. Numerical investigation into effects of seabed topography on flows in and around artificial reefs. Fisheries Science, 74 (2): 236–254. DOI: 10.1111/j.1444–2906.2008.01518.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Takahashi, Y., Fujimori, Y., Hu, F., Shen, X., and Kimura, N., 2015. Design of trawl otter boards using computational fluid dynamics. Fisheries Research, 161: 400–407. DOI: 10.1016/j. fishres.2014.08.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Woo, J., Kim, D., Yoon, H. S., and Na, W. B., 2014. Characterizing Korean general artificial reefs by drag coefficients. Ocean Engineering, 82 (10): 105–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocean eng.2014.02.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Xu, Q. C., Huang, L. Y., Zhao, F. F., Wang, X. X., Tang, Y. L., Liang, Z. L., Wan, R., Sun, P., and Liu, C. D., 2017. Study on the hydrodynamic characteristics of the rectangular V–type otter board using computational fluid dynamics. Fisheries Science, 83 (2): 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s12562–017–1065–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zheng, Y. X., Liang, Z. L., Guan, C. T., Song, X. F., Li, J., Cui, Y., Li, Q., and Zhou, Y., 2015, Numerical simulation and experimental study of the effects of disposal space on the flow field around the combined three–tube reefs. China Ocean Engineering, 29 (3): 445–458. DOI: 10.1007/s13344–015–0031–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Ocean University of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanli Tang
    • 1
  • Wenzhao Yang
    • 1
  • Liyuan Sun
    • 2
  • Fenfang Zhao
    • 1
  • Xiangyu Long
    • 1
  • Gang Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.College of FisheryOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Shandong Hydrobios Resources Conservation and Management CenterYantaiChina

Personalised recommendations