Journal of Ocean University of China

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 675–682 | Cite as

Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emission of Korean Offshore Fisheries

  • Jihoon Lee
  • Taeho KimEmail author
  • Harald Ellingsen
  • Erik Skontorp Hognes
  • Bokyu Hwang


This paper presents the energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission assessments of Korean offshore fisheries. The consumption of energy by fisheries is a significant concern because of its attendant environmental effect, as well as the cost of the fuel consumed in fishing industry. With the global attention of reducing GHG emission and increasing energy efficiency of fuel, the seafood industry needs to further understand its energy use and reduce its GHG emission. In the present study, the amount of energy consumed and the GHG emission of Korean offshore fisheries in a period from 2009 to 2013 were examined. Offshore fisheries accounted for 24% of Korean production in 2013 and 60% of fuel consumption related GHG emission. Whereas the total GHG emission intensity of this sector improved slightly between 2009 and 2012; as such emission decreased by approximately 1.9%, which increased again in 2013. The average amount of total GHG emission in this five years period was 1.78 × 106 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent/year (t CO2 eq. y−1). Active fishing gear was found to consume 20% more fuel than passive gear. However, the production from passive gear was 28%, lower than 72% from active gear. The reason for this is that less abundant stationary resources are harvested using passive gear. Furthermore, the consumption of fuel was significantly influenced by the fishing method. Implementation and development of new fishing technologies and methods are important for improving energy efficiency and reducing the climate impact on fisheries. To realize these purposes, the fishery management system needs to be established by centralizing on energy efficiency and climate effect.

Key words

fuel consumption greenhouse gas emission Korean offshore fishery fuel use intensity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program, through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), and was funded by the Ministry of Education Science and Technology (No. NRF-2012R1A 1A1011106).


  1. Curtis, H. C., Graham, K., and Rossiter, T., 2006. Options for Improving Fuel Efficiency in the UK Fishing Fleet. Sea Fish Industry Authority & European Community, 48pp.Google Scholar
  2. Ellingsen, H., and Aanondsen, S. A., 2006. Environmental impacts of wild caught cod and farmed salmon–A comparison with chicken. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11 (1): 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ellingsen, H., Olaussen, J. O., and Utne, I. B., 2009. Environmental analysis of the Norwegian fishery and aquaculture industry–A preliminary study focusing on farmed salmon. Marine Policy, 33: 479–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Garnett, T., 2011. Where are the best opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the food system (including the food chain)? Food Policy, 36: 523–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hospido, A., and Tyedmers, P., 2005. Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries. Fisheries Research, 76: 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee, D. W., Lee, J. B., Kim, Y. H., and Jung, S. G., 2010. Calculation of carbon dioxide emissions by South Korea’s fishery industry. Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 43 (1): 78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee, J. H., and Lee, C. W., 2010. Low-carbon trawl design with analysis of a gear drag and calculation of construction costs using numerical methods. Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries Technology, 46 (4): 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee, J., and Lee, C. W., 2011. A quantitative analysis of GHG emissions from the Korean offshore large scale fisheries using an LCA method. Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 44 (4): 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee, J., 2013. A quantitative analysis of GHG emissions from the Korean large scale purse seine fishery using LCA method. Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries Technology, 49 (3): 282–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee, J., Lee, C. W., and Kim, J., 2015. A quantitative analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the Danish seine fishery using Life Cycle Assessment. Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48 (2): 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (MOF), 2016. (accessed 10.06.2016).
  12. SUHYUP, 2016. National Federation of Fisheries Cooperatives Korea, tax-free oil sales data, 2009-2013.Google Scholar
  13. Park, J. A., Gardner, C., Chang, M. I., Kim, D. H., and Jang, Y. S., 2015. Fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions from offshore fisheries of the Republic of Korea. PLoS One, 10 (8): 1–12.Google Scholar
  14. Parker, R. W. R., and Tyedmers, P. H., 2015. Fuel consumption of global fishing fleets: Current understanding and knowledge gaps. Fish and Fisheries, 16: 684–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parker, R. W. R., Gardner, C., Green, B. S., and Hartmann, K., 2017. Drivers of fuel use in rock lobster fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 74 (6): 1681–1689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pelletier, N., and Tyedmers, P., 2007. Feeding farmed salmon: Is organic better? Aquaculture, 272: 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prior, D., and Khaled, R., 2009. Optimization of trawl energy efficiency under fishing effort constraint. In: Proceeding of the 9th International Workshop ‘DEMaT09’. Nara, Japan.Google Scholar
  18. Schau, E. M., Ellingsen, H., Endal, A., and Aanondsen, S. A., 2009. Energy consumption in the Norwegian fisheries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17: 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sterling, D., and Goldsworthy, L., 2007. Energy Efficient Fishing: A 2006 Review–Part A: Alternative Fuels and Efficient Engines. Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Australian Government, 52pp.Google Scholar
  20. Sterling, D., and Klaka, K., 2007. Energy Efficient Fishing: A 2006 Review–Part B: Hull Characteristics and Efficiency. Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Australian Government, 27pp.Google Scholar
  21. Thrane, M., 2004a. Environmental impacts from Danish fish products–Hot spots and environmental policies. PhD thesis. Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Denmark, 535pp.Google Scholar
  22. Thrane, M., 2004b. Energy consumption in the Danish fishery: Identification of key factors. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8: 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tyedmers, P., 2004. Fisheries and energy use. In: The Encyclopedia of Energy. Cleveland, C. J., ed., Academic Press, San Diego, 683–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Winther, U., Ziegler, F., Hognes, E. S., Emanuelsson, A., Sund, V., and Ellingsen, H., 2009. Carbon footprint and energy use of Norwegian seafood products. SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture Report, 89pp.Google Scholar
  25. Yang, Y. S., Lee, D. G., Hwang, B. K., Lee, K. H., and Lee, J., 2015. A quantitative analysis of greenhouse gases emissions from bottom pair trawl using a LCA method. Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries Technology, 51 (1): 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ziegler, F., and Hausson, P. A., 2003. Emissions from fuel combustion in Swedish cod fishery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11: 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ziegler, F., 2007. Environmental life cycle assessment of seafood products from capture fisheries. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12: 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ziegler, F., Winther, U., Hognes, E. S., Emanuelsson, A., Sund, V., and Ellingsen, H., 2012. The carbon footprint of Norwegian seafood products on the global seafood market. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17 (1): 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Ocean University of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jihoon Lee
    • 1
  • Taeho Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Harald Ellingsen
    • 2
  • Erik Skontorp Hognes
    • 3
  • Bokyu Hwang
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Marine TechnologyChonnam National UniversityJeollanam-DoKorea
  2. 2.The University Center in SvalbardLongyearbyenNorway
  3. 3.Asplan Viak ASTrondheimNorway
  4. 4.Department of Marine Science and ProductionKunsan National UniversityKunsanKorea

Personalised recommendations