Increasing winter conductive heat transfer in the Arctic sea-ice-covered areas: 1979–2014
- 41 Downloads
Sea ice is a quite sensitive indicator in response to regional and global climate changes. Based on monthly mean Pan-Arctic Ice Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS) sea ice thickness fields, we computed the conductive heat flux (CHF) in the Arctic Ocean in the four winter months (November–February) for a long period of 36 years (1979–2014). The calculated results for each month manifest the increasing extension of the domain with high CHF values since 1979 till 2014. In 2014, regions of roughly 90% of the central Arctic Ocean have been dominated by the CHF values larger than 18 W m−2 (November–December) and 12 W m−2 (January–February), especially significant in the shelf seas around the Arctic Ocean. Moreover, the population distribution frequency (PDF) patterns of the CHF with time show gradually peak shifting toward increased CHF values. The spatiotemporal patterns in terms of the trends in sea ice thickness and other three geophysical parameters, surface air temperature (SAT), sea ice thickness (SIT), and CHF, are well coupled. This suggests that the thinner sea ice cover preconditions for the more oceanic heat loss into atmosphere (as suggested by increased CHF values), which probably contributes to warmer atmosphere which in turn in the long run will cause thinner ice cover. This represents a positive feedback mechanism of which the overall effects would amplify the Arctic climate changes.
Key wordsconductive heat flux sea ice Arctic Ocean
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We would like to thank the data providers. PIOMAS sea ice thickness data are provided by the Polar Science Center (PSC) in Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) at University of Washington. Snow depth, wind speed, and surface air temperature data are obtained from NCEP/NCAR products.
- Döscher, R., Vihma, T., and Maksimovich, E., 2015. Recent advances in understanding the Arctic climate system state and change from a sea ice perspective: A review. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, 14 (7): 10929–10999.Google Scholar
- Krishfield, R. A., and Perovich, D. K., 2005. Spatial and temporal variability of oceanic heat flux to the Arctic ice pack. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, 110 (7): 691–706.Google Scholar
- Kurtz, N. T., Markus, T., Cavalieri, D. J., Sparling, L. C., Krabill, W. B., Gasiewski, A. J., and Sonntag, J. G., 2009. Estimation of sea ice thickness distributions through the combination of snow depth and satellite laser altimetry data. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, 114 (C10): 637–644.Google Scholar
- Lei, R., Li, N., Heil, P., Cheng, B., Zhang, Z., and Sun, B., 2014. Multiyear sea-ice thermal regimes and oceanic heat flux derived from an ice mass balance buoy in the Arctic Ocean. Journal Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119: 537–547.Google Scholar
- Perovich, D. K., Grenfell, T. C., Richter-Menge, J. A., Light, B., Tucker, W. B., and Eicken, H., 2003. Thin and thinner: Ice mass balance measurements during SHEBA. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108 (C3), Doi: 10.1029/2001JC00107.Google Scholar
- Pie, N., Urban, T. J., and Schutz, B. E., 2013. Cross-Validating ICESat-1 and CryoSat-2 using Tide Gauge Measurements. AGU Fall Meeting. San Francisco, USA, 1–4.Google Scholar
- Tonboe, R. T., Pedersen, L. T., and Haas, C., 2009. Simulation of the satellite radar altimeter sea ice thickness retrieval uncertainty. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 36 (2): 513–559.Google Scholar