Advertisement

Journal of Ocean University of China

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 339–345 | Cite as

Genotoxic potential of copper oxide nanoparticles in the bivalve mollusk Mytilus trossulus

  • Victor P. Chelomin
  • Valentina V. Slobodskova
  • Maksim Zakhartsev
  • Sergey Kukla
Article

Abstract

Copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) are among the most widely used metal oxide nanoparticles, which increases the chance of their being released into the marine environment. As the applications of these particles have increased in recent years, their potential impact on the health of marine biota has also increased. However, the toxicological effects of these NPs in the marine environment are poorly known. In the present study, the DNA damaging potential of CuO-NPs in the marine eastern mussel Mytilus trossulus was evaluated and compared to that of dissolved copper exposures. Genotoxicity was assessed by the single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay in mussel gill and digestive gland cells. The results showed that copper in both forms (CuO-NPs and dissolved copper) was accumulated to different extents in mussel tissues. The mussel exposed to the dissolved copper attained higher concentrations of copper in the gills than in the digestive gland. In contrast to these results, it was found that CuO-NPs could induce much higher copper accumulation in the digestive gland than in the gills. A clear and statistically significant increase in DNA damage was found in both tissues of the Cu-exposed group compared to the control mussels. Our results indicated that the CuO-NP exposure produced remarkable effects and increased DNA damage significantly in mussel gill cells only. It should be noted that the digestive gland cells were prone to accumulation following CuO-NPs when compared to the gill cells, while the gill cells were more sensitive to the genotoxic effects of CuO-NPs. These results also suggested the need for a complete risk assessment of engineered particles before its arrival in the consumer market.

Key words

CuO nanoparticles copper accumulation DNA damage genotoxicity Mytilus trossulus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The project was supported by the grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (No. 15-04-06526А).

References

  1. Ahamed, M, Siddiqui, M. A, Akhtar, M. J., Ahmad, I., Pant, A. B., and Alhadlaq, H. A., 2010. Genotoxic potential of copper oxide nanoparticles in human lung epithelial cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 396: 578–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Sid-Cheikh, M., Rouleau, C., and Pelletier, E., 2013. Tissue distribution and kinetics of dissolved and nanoparticulate silver in Iceland scallop (Chlamys islandica). Marine Environmental Research, 86: 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Subiai, S. N., Moody, A. J., Mustafa, S. A., and Jha, A. N., 2011. A multiple biomarker approach to investigate the effects of copper on the marine bivalve mollusk, Mutilus edulis. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 74: 1913–1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arora, S., Rajwade, J. M., and Paknikar, K. M., 2012. Nanotoxicology and in vitro studies: The need of the hour. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 258: 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, T. J., Tyler, C. R., and Galloway, T. S., 2014. Impacts of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles on marine organisms. Environmental Pollution, 186: 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beninger, P. G., Le Pennec, M., and Donval, A., 1991. Mode of particle ingestion in five species of suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs. Marine Biology, 108: 255–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhatt, I., and Tripathi, B. N., 2011. Interaction of engineered nanoparticles with various components of the environment and possible strategies for their risk assessment. Chemosphere, 82: 308–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blinova, I., Ivask, A., Heinlaan, M., Mortimer, M., and Kahru, A., 2010. Ecotoxicity of nanoparticles of CuO and ZnO in natural water. Environmental Pollution, 158: 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bondarenko, O., Ivask, A., Kakinen, A., and Kahru, A., 2012. Sub-toxic effects of CuO-nanoparticles on bacteria: Kinetics, role of Cu ions and possible mechanisms of action. Environmental Pollution, 169: 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bondarenko, O., Juganson, K., Ivask, A., and Kasemets, K., Mortimer, M., and Kahru, A., 2013. Toxicity of Ag, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles to selected environmentally relevant test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: A critical review. Archives of Toxicology, 87: 1181–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buffet, P. E., Tankoua, O. F., Pan, J. F., Berhanu, D., Herrenknecht, C., Poirier, L., Amiard-Triquet, C., Amiard, J. C., Berard, J. B., Risso, C., Guibbolini, M., Romeo, M., Reip, P., Valsami-Jones, E., and Mouneyrac, C., 2011. Behavioural and biochemical responses of two marine invertebrates Scrobicularia plana and Hediste diversicolor to copper oxide nanoparticles. Chemosphere, 84: 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Canty, M. N., Hutchinson, T. H., Brown, R. J., Jones, M. D., and Jha, A. N., 2009. Linking genotoxic responses with cytotoxic and behavioural or physiological consequences: Differential sensitivity of echinoderms (Asterias rubens) and marine molluscs (Mutilus edulis). Aquatic Toxicology, 91: 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cavas, T., and Konen, S., 2008. In vitro genotoxicity testing of the amnesic shellfish poison (domoic acid) in piscine erythrocytes using the micronucleus test and comet assay. Aquatic Toxicology, 90: 154–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia-Negrete, C. A., Blasco, J., Volland, M., Rojas, T. C., Hampel, M., Lapresta-Fernandez, A., Jimenez de Haro, M. C., Soto, M., and Fernandez, A., 2013. Behaviour of Au-citrate nanoparticles in seawater and accumulation in bivalves at environmentally relevant concentrations. Environmental Pollution, 174: 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garnett, M., and Kallinteri, P., 2006. Nanomedicines and nanotoxicology: Some physiological principles. Occupational Medicine, 56: 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gomes, T., Araujo, O., Pereira, R., Almeida, A. C., Cravo, A., and Bebianno, M. J., 2013. Genotoxicity of copper oxide and silver nanoparticles in the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Marine Environmental Research, 84: 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gomes, T., Pereira, C. G., Cardoso, C., Pinheiro, J. P., Cancio, I., and Bebianno, M. J., 2012. Accumulation and toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in the digestive gland of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Aquatic Toxicology, 118-119: 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanagata, N., Zhuang, F., Connolly, S., Li, J., Ogawa, N., and Xu, M., 2011. Molecular responses of human lung epithelial cells to the copper oxide nanoparticles inferred from whole genome expression analysis. ACS Nano, 27: 9326–9338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartwig, A., 1998. Carcinogenicity of metal compounds: Possible role of DNA repair inhibition. Toxicology Letters, 102-103: 235–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayashi, M., Kuge, T., Endoh, D., Nakayama, K., Arikawa, J., Takazawa, A., and Okui, T., 2000. Hepatic copper accumulation induces DNA strand breaks in the liver cells of Long-Evans Cinnamon strain rats. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 276:174–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Isani, G., Falcioni, M. L., Barucca, G., Sekar, D., Andreani, G., Carpene, E., and Falcioni, G., 2013. Comparative toxicity of CuO nanoparticles and CuSO4 in rainbow trout. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 97: 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kahru, A., and Dubourguier, H. C., 2010. From ecotoxicology to nanoecotoxicology. Toxicology, 269: 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kasemets, K., Ivask, A., Dubourguier, H. C., and Kahru, A., 2009. Toxicity of nanoparticles of ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Toxicology in Vitro, 23: 1116–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Livingstone, D. R., Chipman, J. K., Lowe, D. V., Minier, C., Mitchelmore, C. L., Moore, M. N., Peters, L. D., and Pipe, R. K., 2000. Development of biomarkers to detect the effects of organic pollution on aquatic invertebrates: Recent immunological studies on the common mussel (Mutilus edulis L) and other mytilids. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 13: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marnett, L. J., 2000. Oxyradicals and DNA damage. Carcinogenesis, 21: 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matranga, V., and Corsi, I., 2012. Toxic effects of engineered nanoparticles in the marine environment: Model organisms and molecular approaches. Marine Environmental Research, 76: 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCarthy, M. P., Carroll, D. L., and Ringwood, A. H., 2013. Tissue specific responses of oysters, Crassostrea virginica, to silver nanoparticles. Aquatic Toxicology, 138-139: 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Merk, O., and Speit, G., 1999. Detection of crosslinks with the comet assay in relationship to genotoxicity and cytotoxicity. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 33: 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitchelmore, C. L., and Chipman, J. K., 1998. Detection of DNA strand breaks in brown trout (Salmo trutta) hepatocytes and blood cells using the single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay. Aquatic Toxicology, 41: 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moore, M. N., 2006. Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment? Environment International, 32: 967–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mwaanga, P., Carraway, E. R., and van den Hurk, P., 2014. The induction of biochemical changes in Daphnia magna by CuO and ZnO nanoparticles. Aquatic Toxicology, 150: 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nel, A., Xia, T., Madler, L., and Li, N., 2006. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science, 311: 622–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oberdorster, G., Oberdorster, E., and Oberdorster, J., 2005. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113: 823–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pang, C., Selck, H., Misra, S. K., Berhanu, D., Dybowska, A., Valsami-Jones, E., and Forbes, V. E., 2012. Effects of sediment-associated copper to the deposit feeding snail, Potamopyrgus antipodarum: A comparison of Cu added in aqueos form or nano-and micro-CuO particles. Aquatic Toxicology, 106-107: 114–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raimundo, J., Costa, P. M., Vale, C., Costa, M. H., and Moura, I., 2010. DNA damage and metal accumulation in four tissues of feral Octopus vulgaris from two coastal areas in Portugal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 73: 1543–1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwarz, J. A., Mitchelmore, C. L., Jones, R., O’Dea, A., and Seymour, S., 2013. Exposure to copper induces oxidative and stress responses and DNA damage in the coral Montastraea franksi. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 157 C: 272–279.Google Scholar
  37. Semisch, A., Ohle, J., Witt, B., and Hartwig, A., 2014. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of nano-and microparticulate copper oxide: Role of solubility and intracellular bioavailability. Particle and Fibre Toxicology, 11: 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shaw, B. J., and Handy, R. D., 2011. Physiological effects of nanoparticles on fish: A comparison of nanometals versus metal ions. Environment International, 37: 1083–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singh, N., Manshian, B., Jenkins, G. J. S., Griffiths, S. M., Williams, P. M., Maffeis, T. G. G., Wright, C. J., and Doak, S. H., 2009. NanoGenotoxicology: The DNA damaging potential of engineered nanomaterials. Biomaterials, 30: 3891–3914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Slobodskova, V. V., Zhukovskaya, A. F., and Chelomin, V. P., 2012. DNA damage in the gill cells of the marine scallop Mizuhopecten yessoensis during anoxic stress and recovery. Ocean Science Journal, 47: 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Song, M. F., Li, Y. S., Kasai, H., and Kawai, K., 2012. Metal nanoparticle-induced micronuclei and oxidative DNA damage in mice. Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, 50: 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tedesco, S., Doyle, H., Blasco, J., Redmond, G., and Sheehan, D., 2010. Oxidative stress and toxicity of gold nanoparticles in Mytilus edulis. Aquatic Toxicology, 100: 178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Ocean University of China and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor P. Chelomin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Valentina V. Slobodskova
    • 1
  • Maksim Zakhartsev
    • 3
  • Sergey Kukla
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Marine EcotoxicologyV. I. Ilichev Pacific Oceanological Institute of the Far East Branch of Russian Academy of SciencesVladivostokRussia
  2. 2.The Far Eastern Federal UniversitySchool of Natural SciencesVladivostokRussia
  3. 3.University of HohenheimStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations