Advertisement

Journal of Ocean University of China

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 941–950 | Cite as

HPLC pigment profiles of 31 harmful algal bloom species isolated from the coastal sea areas of China

  • Shuxia Liu
  • Peng Yao
  • Zhigang Yu
  • Dong Li
  • Chunmei Deng
  • Yu Zhen
Article

Abstract

Chemotaxonomy based on diagnostic pigments is now a routine tool for macroscopic determination of the composition and abundance of phytoplankton in various aquatic environments. Since the taxonomic capability of this method depends on the relationships between diagnostic pigments and chlorophyll a of classified groups, it is critical to calibrate it by using pigment relationships obtained from representative and/or dominant species local to targeted investigation area. In this study, pigment profiles of 31 harmful algal bloom (HAB) species isolated from the coastal sea areas of China were analyzed with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Pigment compositions, cellular pigment densities and ratios of pigments to chlorophyll a were determined and calculated. Among all these species, 25 kinds of pigments were detected, of which fucoxanthin, peridinin, 19′-butanoyloxyfucoxanthin, 19′-hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin, violaxanthin, and antheraxanthin were diagnostic pigments. Cellular pigment density was basically independent of species and environmental conditions, and therefore was recommended as a bridge to compare the results of HPLC-CHEMTAX technique with the traditional microscopy method. Pigment ratios of algal species isolated from the coast of China, especially the diagnostic pigment ratios, were higher than those from other locations. According to these results, pigment ratio ranges of four classes of phytoplankton common off the coast of China were summarized for using in the current chemotaxonomic method. Moreover, the differences of pigments ratios among different species under the same culturing conditions were consistent with their biological differences. Such differences have the potential to be used to classify the phytoplankton below class, which is meaningful for monitoring HABs by HPLC-CHEMTAX.

Key words

harmful algal bloom species high performance liquid chromatography chemotaxonomy cellular pigment density pigment ratios 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdenadher, M., Hamza, A., Fekih, W., Hannachi, I., Bellaaj, A. Z., Bradai, M. N., and Aleya, L., 2012. Factors determining the dynamics of toxic blooms of Alexandrium minutum during a 10-year study along the shallow southwestern Mediterranean coasts. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 106: 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohu, S., Mangialajo, L., Thibaut, T., Blanfuné, A., Marro, S., and Lemée, R., 2013. Proliferation of the toxic dinoflagellate Ostreopsis cf. ovata in relation to depth, biotic substrate and environmental factors in the North West Mediterranean Sea. Harmful Algae, 24: 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Souza, M. S., Mende, C. R. B., Garcia, V. M. T., Pollery, R., and Brotas, V., 2012. Phytoplankton community during a coccolithophorid bloom in the Patagonian Shelf: Microscopic and high-performance liquid chromatography pigment analyses. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK, 92(1): 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eker-Develi, E., Berthon, J., Canuti, E., Slabakova, N., Moncheva, S., Shtereva, G., and Dzhurova, B., 2012. Phytoplankton taxonomy based on CHEMTAX and microscopy in the northwestern Black Sea. Journal of Marine Systems, 94: 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Falkowski, P. G., 1980. Primary Productivity in the Sea. Plenum Press, New York, 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goericke, R., and Montoya, J. P., 1998. Estimating the contribution of microalgal taxa to chlorophyll a in the field-variations of pigment ratios under nutrient- and light-limited growth. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 169: 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galluzzi, L., Bertozzini, E., Penna, A., Perini, F., Pigalarga, A., Granéli, E., and Magnani, M., 2008. Detection and quantification of Prymnesium parvum (Haptophyceae) by real-time PCR. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 46: 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gieskes, W. W. C., and Kraay, G. W., 1986. Floristic and physiological differences between the shallow and the deep nanophytoplankton community in the euphotic zone of the open tropical Atlantic revealed by HPLC analysis of pigments. Marine Biology, 91: 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hou, J. J., Huang, B. Q., Hu, J., Lin, L. Z., and Hong, H. S., 2008. Fourteen FITC-conjugated lectins as a tool for the recognition and differentiation of some harmful algae in Chinese coastal waters. Journal of Applied Phycology, 20: 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hillebrand, H., Dürselen, C. D., Kirschtel, D., Pollingher, U., and Zohary, T., 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology, 35: 403–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Higgins, H. W., Wright, S. W., and Schlüter, L., 2011. Quantitative interpretation of chemotaxonomic pigment data. In: Phytoplankton Pigments Characterization, Chemotaxonomy and Applications in Oceanography. Roy, S., et al., eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 257–313.Google Scholar
  12. Jeffrey, S. W., and Hallegraeff, G. W. 1987. Chlorophyllase distribution in ten classes of phytoplankton: a problem for chlorophyll analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 35: 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeffrey, S. W., 1997. Chlorophyll and carotenoid extinction coefficients. In: Phytoplankton Pigments in Oceanography: Guidelines to Modern Methods. Jeffrey, S. W., et al., UNE-SCO Publishing, Paris, 595–596.Google Scholar
  14. Jeffrey, S. W., and Wright, S. W., 2006. Photosynthetic pigments in marine microalgae: insights from cultures and the sea. In: Algal Cultures, Analogues of Blooms and Applications. Subba Rao, D. V., ed., Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, 33–90.Google Scholar
  15. Klein, B., and Sournia, A., 1987. A daily study of the diatom spring bloom at Roscoff, France, in 1985. II. Phytoplankton pigment composition studied by HPLC analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 37: 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Latasa, M., Scharek, R., Gall, F. L., and Guillou, L., 2004. Pigment suites and taxonomic groups in prasinophyceae. Journal of Phycology, 40: 1149–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laviale, M., and Neveux, J., 2011. Relationships between pigment ratios and growth irradiance in 11 marine phytoplankton species. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 425: 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laws, E. A., and Bannister, T. T., 1980. Nutrient- and light-limited growth of Thalassiosira fluviatilis in continuous culture, with implications for phytoplankton growth in the ocean. Limnolgy Oceanography, 25: 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewitus, A. J., White, D. L., Tymowski, R. G., Geesey, M. E., Hymel, S. N., and Noble, P. A., 2005. Adapting the CHEMTAX method for assessing phytoplankton taxonomic composition in Southeastern U.S. Estuaries. Estuaries, 28(1): 160–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu, S. X., Yu, Z. G., Yao, P., Zheng, Y., and Li, D., 2011. Effects of irradiance on pigment signatures of harmful algae during growth process. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 30(6): 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Llewellyn, C. A., and Gibb, S. W., 2000. Intra-class variability in the carbon, pigment and biomineral content of prymnesiophytes and diatoms. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 193: 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mackey, M. D., Mackey, D. J., Higgins, H. W., and Wright, S. W., 1996. CHEMTAX - a program for estimating class abundances from chemical markers: Application to HPLC measurements of phytoplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 144: 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rodríguez, F., Chauton, M., Johnsen, G., Andresen, L., Olsen, L. M., and Zapata, M., 2006. Photoacclimation in phytoplankton: Implications for biomass estimates, pigment functionality and chemotaxonomy. Marine Biology, 148: 963–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ruivo, M., Amorim, A., and Cartaxana, P., 2011. Effects of growth phase and irradiance on phytoplankton pigment ratios: Implications for chemotaxonomy in coastal waters. Journal of Plankton Research, 33(7): 1012–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schlüter, L., Møhlenberg, F., Havskum, H., and Larsen, S., 2000. The use of phytoplankton pigments for identifying and quantifying phytoplankton groups in coastal areas: Testing the influence of light and nutrients on pigment/chlorophyll a ratios. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 192: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Seoane, S., Zapata, M., and Orive, E., 2009. Growth rates and pigment patterns of haptophytes isolated from estuarine waters. Journal of Sea Research, 62: 286–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun, J., Liu, D. Y., and Qian, S. B., 1999. Study on phytoplankton biomass I. Phytoplankton measurement biomass from cell volume or plasma volume. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 21(2): 75–85 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  28. Tomas, C. R., and Smayda, T. J., 2008. Red tide blooms of Cochlodinium polykrikoides in a coastal cove. Harmful Algae, 7: 308–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Oostende, N., Harlay, J., Vanelslander, B., Chou, L., Vyverman, W., and Sabbe, K., 2012. Phytoplankton community dynamics during late spring coccolithophore blooms at the continental margin of the Celtic Sea (North East Atlantic, 2006–2008). Progress in Oceanography, 104: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang, B., Mi, T. Z., Lü, S. H., Sun, J., Li, R. X., and Yu, Z. G., 2007. Cloning and analysis of 28S rDNA partial sequences of several strains of Prorocentrum. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 29(1): 120–126 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  31. Wright, S. W., van den Enden, R. L., Pearce, I., Davidson, A. T., Scott, F. J., and Westwood, K. J., 2010. Phytoplankton community structure and stocks in the Southern Ocean (30–80°E) determined by CHEMTAX analysis of HPLC pigment signatures. Deep-Sea Research II, 57: 758–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yao, P., Yu, Z. G., and Deng, C. M., 2006. Pigment signatures of some diatoms isolated from China seas. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 25(1): 108–118.Google Scholar
  33. Yao, P., Yu, Z. G., Deng, C. M., Liu, S. X., and Zhen, Y., 2011. Classification of marine diatoms using pigment ratio suites. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 29(5): 1075–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yan, T., Zhou, M. J., and Zou, J. Z., 2002. A national report on harmful algal blooms in China. In: Harmful Algal Blooms in the PICES Region of the North Pacific. Taylor, F. J. R., and Trainer, V. L., eds., Secretariat, 21–32.Google Scholar
  35. Yu, J., Tang, D. L., Oh, I. S., and Yao, L. J., 2007. Response of harmful algal blooms to environmental changes in Daya Bay, China. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 18(5): 1011–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zapata, M., Jefrrey, S. W., Wright, S. W., Rodríguez, F., Garrido, J. L., and Clementson, L., 2004. Photosynthetic pigments in 37 species (65 strains) of Haptophyta: Implications for oceanography and chemotaxonomy. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 270: 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zapata, M., Rodríguez, F., Fraga, S., Barra, L., and Ruggiero, M. V., 2011. Chlorophyll c pigment patterns in 18 species (51 strains) of the genus Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae). Journal of Phycology, 47: 1274–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zapata, M., Rodríguez, F., and Garrido, J. L., 2000. Separation of chlorophylls and carotenoids from marine phytoplankton: A new HPLC method using a reversed phase C8 column and pyridine-containing mobile phases. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 195: 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Ocean University of China and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuxia Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peng Yao
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Zhigang Yu
    • 1
    • 4
  • Dong Li
    • 1
    • 5
  • Chunmei Deng
    • 6
  • Yu Zhen
    • 7
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and TechnologyMinistry of EducationQingdaoP. R. China
  2. 2.Ocean CollegeZhejiang UniversityHangzhouP. R. China
  3. 3.Qingdao Collaborative Innovation Center of Marine Science and TechnologyQingdaoP. R. China
  4. 4.Institute of Marine Organic GeochemistryOcean University of ChinaQingdaoP. R. China
  5. 5.College of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringOcean University of ChinaQingdaoP. R. China
  6. 6.Key Laboratory of Marine Spill Oil Identification and Damage Assessment TechnologyState Oceanic AdministrationQingdaoP. R. China
  7. 7.Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and EcologyMinistry of EducationQingdaoP. R. China

Personalised recommendations