A wavelength division multiplexer based on plastic surfacerelief grating applied to local area communication network
- 59 Downloads
Abstract
A plastic surface-relief grating as a wavelength division multiplexer is designed and fabricated with the conventional mould pressing technique using the transmission-type fused quartz phase grating as mask pattern and polycarbonate as basal material. The experiment results show that in an optimizing process, the plastic surface-relief grating has the highest firstorder diffraction efficiency under adequate groove depth and incident angle, and can be used as the best optical path for wavelength division multiplexing (WDM). We also establish the experiment setup for testing the WDM performance of the plastic surface-relief grating based wavelength division multiplexer. The results show that the proposed wavelength division multiplexer has the high-stability temperature characteristics, the low insertion loss of less than 5 dB, the large isolation of greater than 20 dB, the low polarization-dependent loss (PDL) of less than 0.4 dB and the relatively steep pass-band characteristics. It is a WDM device with good performance, which can be applied in short distance communication.
Keywords
Wavelength Division Multiplex Diffraction Efficiency Mould Temperature Groove Depth Incident WavelengthPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]Peng Hsiao-Chun, Lu Hai-Han, Li Chung-Yi, Su Heng-Sheng and Hsu Chin-Tai, Optics Express 19, 6749 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]Tatsuya Sugita, Tomiya Abe, Kouki Hirano and Yuzo Itoh, Applied Optics 44, 2933 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]Kenji Makino, Takuhiro Nakamura, Takaaki Ishigure and Yasuhiro Koike, Journal of Lightwave Technology 23, 2062 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]Möllers I., Jäger D., Gaudino R., Nocivelli A., Kragl H., Ziemann O., Weber N., Koonen T., Lezzi C., Bluschke A. and Randel S., IEEE Communications Magazine 47, 58 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]Daniel Felipe Cárdenas Lopez, Antonino Nespola, Stefano Camatel, Silvio Abrate and Roberto Gaudino, Journal of Lightwave Technology 27, 2908 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]Koike Y. and Koike K., Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics 49, 2 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]Martínez Juan José, Merayo Noemi and Villafranca Asier, Applied Optics 51, 692 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]F. Saliou, P. Chanclou and F. Laurent, J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 1, C51 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]Renato C. Rabelo, Ohannes Eknoyan and Henry F. Taylor, Applied Optics 50, 562 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [10]Cijun Shuai, Chengde Gao and Y. Nie, Applied Optics 49, 4514 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [11]Nathan Hagen and Tomasz S. Tkaczyk, Applied Optics 50, 4998 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]Yuan Luo, Jose Castro and Jennifer K. Barton, Optics Express 18, 19273 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]A. A. Belokopytov and N. F. Shakirov, Journal of Optical Technology 77, 510 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [14]Bayanhesshig, Qi Xiang-dong and Tang Yu-guo, Journal of Optoelectronics · Laser 14, 1021 (2003). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- [15]Li Huan-lu and Lou Shu-qin, Journal of Optoelectronics · Laser 21, 1459 (2010). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- [16]Cao Fan, Shou Guo-chu and Hu Yi-hong, Journal of Optoelectronics · Laser 20, 1033 (2009). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- [17]Zhang Jia-shun, An Jun-ming and Zhao Lei, Journal of Optoelectronics · Laser 21, 1431 (2010). (in Chinese)Google Scholar