Advertisement

Logica Universalis

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 193–211 | Cite as

Boethius of Dacia (1270s) and Radulphus Brito (1290s) on the Universal Sign ‘Every’

  • Ana María Mora-Márquez
Article

Abstract

In this article I present the analysis of the syncategorematic term ‘omnis’ in the commentaries on the Topics by the Parisian masters of Arts Boethius of Dacia and Radulphus Brito. I shall focus on the different relations between subject, predicate and particular instances that obtain in universally quantified statements, and in particular on the relations that obtain in universally quantified statements with an empty subject. I also attempt to highlight some continuities and ruptures with respect to this problem in its 13th-century treatments, by comparing Boethius and Brito’s analyses with the earlier (first half of the century) analyses put forth by Peter of Spain and William of Sherwood.

Keywords

Boethius of Dacia Radulphus Brito; universal quantification medieval logic medieval philosophy 

Mathematics Subject Classification

01A35 03–03 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cesalli, L.: Le réalisme propositionnel. Sémantique et ontologie des propositions chez Jean Duns Scot, Gauthier Burley, Richard Brinkley et Jean Wyclif, Paris (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cesalli L., de Libera A., Goubier F.: ‘Does Loving Every Mean Loving Every Every, even non Existent Ones? Distribution and Universals in the Opus puerorum’. In: Fink, J., Hansen, H., Mora-Márquez, A.M. (eds) Logic and Language in the Middle Ages. A Volume in Honour of Sten Ebbesen. Leiden, pp. 305–336 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ebbesen, S.: The Chimera’s Diary. In: Knuutila, S., Hintikka, J. (eds.) The logic of Being, Dordrecht, pp. 115–143 (1986) (repr. in S. Ebbesen, Collected Essays, 2 vols. Aldershot, 2008–9, vol. 1, pp. 35–57)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ebbesen, S.: The Man who Loved Every: Boethius of Dacia on logic and metaphysics. The Modern Schoolman 82, 235–250 (2005) (repr. in S. Ebbesen, Collected Essays, vol. 2, pp. 163–177).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goubier, F.: Les syncatégorèmes au XIIIe siècle. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 25/2, 85–113 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kirchhoff, R.: Die Syncategoremata des Wilhelm von Sherwood, Leiden (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kneepkens, C.H.: On Medieval Syntactic Thought with Special Reference to the Notion of Construction. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 12/2, 139–176 (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kneepkens, C.H.: Significatio generalis and Significatio specialis: Notes on Nicholas of Paris. Contribution to Early Thirteenth-Century Linguistic Thought. In: Ebbesen, S., Friedman, R., (eds.) Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Acts of the symposium The Copenhagen School of Medieval Philosophy, January 10–13, 1996), Copenhagen, pp. 17–44 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Libera, A.: César et le phénix: Distinctions et sophismata parisiens du XIIIe siècle, Pisa (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Libera, A.: Faire de nécessité loi: Théories de la modalité dans le sophisma. Omnis homo de necessitate est animal du codex parisinus 16135, ff. 11rb–12rb’, AHDLMA 76, 179–233 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Libera, A.: Référence et quantification: Sur la théorie de la distributio au XIIIe siècle. In: de Libera, A., et al. (eds.) Langages et philosophie: Hommage à Jean Jolivet, Paris, 177–200 (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marmo, C.: The Semantics of the Modistae. In: Ebbesen, S., Friedman, R.(eds.) Medieval Analyses, pp. 83–104Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mora-Márquez A.M.: Martinus Dacus and Boethius Dacus on the Signification of Terms and the Truth-value of Assertions. Vivarium 52, 23–48 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mora-Márquez, A.M.: Radulphus Brito on Common Names, Concepts and Things. In: Fink, J., et al. (eds.) Logic and Language, pp. 357–372Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosier-Catach, I.: Grammar. In: Pasnau, R., (ed.) The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, vol 2, Cambridge, 1, 196–218 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tabarroni, A.: Omnis phoenix est: Quantification and existence in a new sophismata collection (MS Clm. 14522). In: Read, S.,(ed.) Sophisms in Medieval Grammar and Logic, Dordrecht 185–201 (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gothenburg UniversityGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations