Advertisement

Complex Analysis and Operator Theory

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 967–983 | Cite as

Sectoriality and Essential Spectrum of Non Symmetric Graph Laplacians

  • Colette Anné
  • Marwa BaltiEmail author
  • Nabila Torki-Hamza
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

We consider a non self-adjoint Laplacian on a directed graph with non symmetric edge weights. We give sufficient conditions for this Laplacian to be sectorial. We introduce a special self-adjoint operator and compare its essential spectrum with that of the non self-adjoint Laplacian considered.

Keywords

Directed graph Non self-adjoint Laplacian Numerical range Sectorial operator Essential spectrum 

Mathematics Subject Classification

47A45 47A12 47A10 47B25 39A12 47B37 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous referees for the careful reading of our paper and the valuable comments and suggestions. The author Marwa Balti was financially supported by the DéfiMaths program of the Federation of Mathematical Research of the “Pays de Loire” and by the “PHC Utique” program of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of higher education and research and the Tunisian Ministry of higher education and scientific research in the CMCU project number 13G1501 “Graphes, Géométrie et Théorie Spectrale” during her visits to the Laboratory of Mathematics Jean Leray of Nantes (LMJL). Also, the three authors would like to thank the Laboratory of Mathematics Jean Leray of Nantes (LMJL) and the research unity (UR/13ES47) of Faculty of Sciences of Bizerta (University of Carthage) for their continuous financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Akkouche, S.: Sur la théorie spectrale des opérateurs de Schrödinnger discrets. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Bordeaux (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anné, C., Torki-Hamza, N.: The Gauss–Bonnet operator of an infinite graph. Anal. Math. Phys. 5, 137–159 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arendt, W., ter Elst, A.F.M.: From forms to semigroups. Spectral Theory, Mathematical System Theory, Evolution Equations, Differential and Difference Equations. Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., vol. 221, pp. 47–69. Birkhäuser, Basel (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balti, M.: Laplaciens non auto-adjoints sur un graphe orienté. Université de Carthage et Université de Nantes, Thèse de Doctorat (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balti, M.: On the eigenvalues of weighted directed graphs. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 11, 1387–1406 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balti, M.: Non self-adjoint Laplacians on a directed graph. Filomat 18, 5671–5683 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brooks, R.: On the spectrum of non-compact manifolds with finite volume. Math. Z. 187, 425–432 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donnelly, H., Li, P.: Pure point spectrum and negative curvature for noncompact manifolds. Duke Math. J. 46, 497–503 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Evans, W.D., Lewis, R.T., Zettl, A.: Non self-adjoint operators and their essential spectra. In: Ellworthy, D. (ed.) Form Local Times to Global Geometry, Control and Physics. Differential Equation and Operators, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1032, pp. 123–160 (1983)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fujiwara, K.: The Laplacian on rapidly branching trees. Duke Math. J. 83, 191–202 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang, X., Keller, M., Masamune, J., Wojciechowskil, R.K.: A note on self-adjoint extensions of the Laplacian on weighted graphs. J. Funct. Anal. 265, 1556–1578 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kato, T.: Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators. Springer, Berlin (1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keller, M.: The essential spectrum of the Laplacian on rapidly branching tessellations. Mathematische Annalen 346, 51–66 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keller, M., Lenz, D.: Dirichlet forms and stochastic completeness of graphs and subgraphs. J. Reine Angew. Math. 666, 189–223 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keller, M., Münch, F., Pogorzelski, A.N.D.F.: Geometry and spectrum of rapidly branching graphs. Mathematische Nachrichten 289, 1636–1647 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khanalizadeh, M.: Sectorial forms and m-sectorial operators. Seminararbetit zum fach funktionalanalysis. Technische Universität Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lewis, R.T.: Applications of a comparison theorem for quasi-accretive operators in a Hilbert space. In: Everitt, W., Sleeman, B. (eds.) Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 964, pp. 422–434. Springer, Berlin (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I. Academic Press, Cambridge (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Torki-Hamza, N.: Laplaciens de graphes infinis. I: Graphes métriquement complets. Conflu. Math. 2, 333–350 (2010). Translated to: Essential self-adjointness for combinatorial Schrödinger operators I- Metrically complete graphs. arXiv:1201.4644v1
  20. 20.
    Yosida, K.: Functional Analysis. Springer, Berlin (1974)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wojciechowski, R.K.: Heat kernel and essential spectrum of infinite graphs. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 58, 1419–1441 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculté des Sciences de Bizerte: Mathématiques et Applications (UR/13ES47)Université de CarthageBizerteTunisia
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Mathématique Jean Lauray, CNRS, Faculté des SciencesUniversité de NantesNantesFrance
  3. 3.Université de Kairouan, Isig-KKairouanTunisia

Personalised recommendations