Advertisement

Characterization of CANON reactor performance and microbial community shifts with elevated COD/N ratios under a continuous aeration mode

  • Yao Zhang
  • Yayi WangEmail author
  • Yuan Yan
  • Haicheng Han
  • Min Wu
Research Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of increasing COD/N on nitrogen removal performance and microbial structure were investigated in a SBR adopting a completely autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite process with a continuous aeration mode (DO at approximately 0.15–0.2 mg/L). As the COD/N increased from 0.1 to ≤ 0.59, the nitrogen removal efficiency (NRE) increased from 88.7% to 95.5%; while at COD/N ratios of 0.59–0.82, the NRE remained at 90.7%–95.5%. As the COD/N increased from 0.82 to 1.07, the NRE decreased continuously until reaching 60.1%. Nitrosomonas sp. (AOB) and Candidatus Jettenia (anammox bacteria) were the main functional genera in the SBR. As the COD/N increased from 0.10 to 1.07, the relative abundance of Nitrosomonas decreased from 13.4% to 2.0%, while that of Candidatus Jettenia decreased from 35% to 9.9% with COD/N <0.82 then increased to 45.4% at a COD/N of 1.07. Aerobic heterotrophic bacteria outcompeted AOB at high COD loadings (650 mg/L) because of oxygen competition, which ultimately led to deteriorated nitrogen removal performance.

Keywords

CANON process COD/N ratio Anammox Ammonia oxidizing bacteria Aerobic heterotrophic bacteria 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51522809 and 51378370). The Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse (Tongji University), China (Grant No. PCRRT16005) is also acknowledged.

Supplementary material

11783_2019_1095_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (255 kb)
Supplementary Material

References

  1. APHA (2012). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Bae H, Chung Y C, Jung J Y (2010). Microbial community structure and occurrence of diverse autotrophic ammonium oxidizing microorganisms in the anammox process. Water Science and Technology, 61 (11): 2723–2732Google Scholar
  3. Björnsson L, Hugenholtz P, Tyson G W, Blackall L L (2002). Filamentous Chloroflexi (green non-sulfur bacteria) are abundant in wastewater treatment processes with biological nutrient removal. Microbiology-Sgm, 148(Pt 8): 2309–2318Google Scholar
  4. Cao S, Du R, Li B, Ren N, Peng Y (2016). High-throughput profiling of microbial community structures in an ANAMMOX-UASB reactor treating high-strength wastewater. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 100(14): 6457–6467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chamchoi N, Nitisoravut S, Schmidt J E (2008). Inactivation of ANAMMOX communities under concurrent operation of anaerobic ammonium oxidation (ANAMMOX) and denitrification. Bioresource Technology, 99(9): 3331–3336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen C, Sun F, Zhang H, Wang J, Shen Y, Liang X (2016). Evaluation of COD effect on anammox process and microbial communities in the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). Bioresource Technology, 216: 571–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen H, Liu S, Yang F, Xue Y, Wang T (2009). The development of simultaneous partial nitrification, ANAMMOX and denitrification (SNAD) process in a single reactor for nitrogen removal. Bioresource Technology, 100(4): 1548–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chu Z, Wang K, Li X, Zhu M, Yang L, Zhang J (2015). Microbial characterization of aggregates within a one-stage nitritationanammox system using high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Chemical Engineering Journal, 262: 41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Almeida Fernandes L, Pereira A D, Leal C D, Davenport R, Werner D, Filho C R M, Bressani-Ribeiro T, de Lemos Chernicharo C A, de Araújo J C (2018). Effect of temperature on microbial diversity and nitrogen removal performance of an anammox reactor treating anaerobically pretreated municipal wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 258: 208–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeGraaf A, DeBruijn P, Robertson L A, Jetten M, Kuenen J G (1996). Autotrophic growth of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms in a fluidized bed reactor. Microbiology-UK, 142(8): 2187–2196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jenni S, Vlaeminck S E, Morgenroth E, Udert K M (2014). Successful application of nitritation/anammox to wastewater with elevated organic carbon to ammonia ratios. Water Research, 49: 316–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kartal B, Rattray J, van Niftrik L A, van de Vossenberg J, Schmid M C, Webb R I, Schouten S, Fuerst J A, Damsté J S S, Jetten MS M, Strous M (2007). Candidatus “Anammoxoglobus propionicus” a new propionate oxidizing species of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 30(1): 39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kartal B, van Niftrik L, Rattray J, van de Vossenberg J L, Schmid M C, Sinninghe Damsté J, Jetten M S M, Strous M (2008). Candidatus ‘Brocadia fulgida’: An autofluorescent anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacterium. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 63(1): 46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kindaichi T, Yuri S, Ozaki N, Ohashi A (2012). Ecophysiological role and function of uncultured Chloroflexi in an anammox reactor. Water Science and Technology, 66(12): 2556–2561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kornaros M, Dokianakis S N, Lyberatos G (2010). Partial nitrification/denitrification can be attributed to the slow response of nitrite oxidizing bacteria to periodic anoxic disturbances. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(19 19SI): 7245–7253Google Scholar
  16. Kumar M, Lin J G (2010). Co-existence of anammox and denitrification for simultaneous nitrogen and carbon removal—Strategies and issues. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 178(1-3): 1–9Google Scholar
  17. Lackner S, Gilbert E M, Vlaeminck S E, Joss A, Horn H, van Loosdrecht M C M (2014). Full-scale partial nitritation/anammox experiences— An application survey. Water Research, 55: 292–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lackner S, Horn H (2013). Comparing the performance and operation stability of an SBR and MBBR for single-stage nitritation-anammox treating wastewater with high organic load. Environmental Technology, 34(9-12): 1319–1328Google Scholar
  19. Leal C D, Pereira A D, Nunes F T, Ferreira L O, Coelho A C C, Bicalho S K, Mac Conell E F A, Ribeiro T B, de Lemos Chernicharo C A, de Araújo J C (2016). Anammox for nitrogen removal from anaerobically pre-treated municipal wastewater: Effect of COD/N ratios on process performance and bacterial community structure. Bioresource Technology, 211: 257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin X, Wang Y (2017). Microstructure of anammox granules and mechanisms endowing their intensity revealed by microscopic inspection and rheometry. Water Research, 120: 22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neef A, Amann R, Schlesner H, Schleifer K H (1998). Monitoring a widespread bacterial group: In situ detection of planctomycetes with 16S rRNA-targeted probes. Microbiology-UK, 144(Pt 12): 3257–3266Google Scholar
  22. Ni S Q, Ni J Y, Hu D L, Sung S (2012). Effect of organic matter on the performance of granular anammox process. Bioresource Technology, 110: 701–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pereira A D, Leal C D, Dias M F, Etchebehere C, Chernicharo C A L, de Araújo J C (2014). Effect of phenol on the nitrogen removal performance and microbial community structure and composition of an anammox reactor. Bioresource Technology, 166: 103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sabumon P C (2007). Anaerobic ammonia removal in presence of organic matter: a novel route. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 149 (1): 49–59Google Scholar
  25. Sánchez Guillén J A, Yimman Y, Lopez Vazquez C M, Brdjanovic D, van Lier J B (2014). Effects of organic carbon source, chemical oxygen demand/N ratio and temperature on autotrophic nitrogen removal. Water Science and Technology, 69(10): 2079–2084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schaubroeck T, De Clippeleir H,Weissenbacher N, Dewulf J, Boeckx P, Vlaeminck S E, Wett B (2015). Environmental sustainability of an energy self-sufficient sewage treatment plant: improvements through DEMON and co-digestion. Water Research, 74: 166–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shu D, He Y, Yue H, Wang Q (2015). Microbial structures and community functions of anaerobic sludge in six full-scale wastewater treatment plants as revealed by 454 high-throughput pyrosequencing. Bioresource Technology, 186: 163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sliekers A O, Derwort N, Campos-Gomez J L, Strous M, Kuenen J G, Jetten M (2002). Completely autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite in one single reactor. Water Research, 36(PII S0043–1354(01) 00476–610): 2475–2482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tang C J, Zheng P, Wang C H, Mahmood Q (2010). Suppression of anaerobic ammonium oxidizers under high organic content in highrate Anammox UASB reactor. Bioresource Technology, 101(6): 1762–1768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Third K A, Paxman J, Schmid M, Strous M, JettenMS, Cord-Ruwisch R (2005). Treatment of nitrogen-rich wastewater using partial nitrification and anammox in the CANON process. Water Science and Technology, 52(4): 47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Third K A, Sliekers A O, Kuenen J G, Jetten M S (2001). The CANON system (Completely Autotrophic Nitrogen-removal Over Nitrite) under ammonium limitation: Interaction and competition between three groups of bacteria. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 24 (4): 588–596Google Scholar
  32. Vlaeminck S E, Terada A, Smets B F, De Clippeleir H, Schaubroeck T, Bolca S, Demeestere L, Mast J, Boon N, Carballa M, Verstraete W (2010). Aggregate size and architecture determine microbial activity balance for one-stage partial nitritation and anammox. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76(3): 900–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang Y, Chen J, Zhou S, Wang X, Chen Y, Lin X, Yan Y, Ma X, Wu M, Han H (2017). 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing reveals shift in nitrogen conversion related microorganisms in a CANON system in response to salt stress. Chemical Engineering Journal, 317: 512–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yan Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Lin X, Wu M, Chen J (2016). Single-stage PN/A technology treating saline ammonia-rich wastewater: Finding the balance between efficient performance and less N2O and NO emissions. RSC Advances, 6(114): 113152–113162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang X, Yu B, Zhang N, Zhang H, Wang C, Zhang H (2016). Effect of inorganic carbon on nitrogen removal and microbial communities of CANON process in a membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technology, 202: 113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhao J, Zuo J, Lin J, Li P (2015). The performance of a combined nitritation-anammox reactor treating anaerobic digestion supernatant under various C/N ratios. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 30: 207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhou X, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Liu Y (2018). Full nitration-denitration versus partial nitration-denitration-anammox for treating highstrength ammonium-rich organic wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 261: 379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou X, Zhang Z, Zhang X, Liu Y (2018). A novel single-stage process integrating simultaneous COD oxidation, partial nitritation-denitritation and anammox (SCONDA) for treating ammonia-rich organic wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 254: 50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhu Y, Wang Y, Jiang X, Zhou S, Wu M, Pan M, Chen H (2017). Microbial community compositional analysis for membrane bioreactor treating antibiotics containing wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 325: 300–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yao Zhang
    • 1
  • Yayi Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yuan Yan
    • 1
  • Haicheng Han
    • 1
  • Min Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, College of Environmental Science and EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations