Advertisement

“NEW” resource recovery from wastewater using bioelectrochemical systems: Moving forward with functions

  • Akshay Jain
  • Zhen He
Feature Article
  • 21 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Column—Young Talents

Abstract

Bioelectrochemical systems (BES) have been extensively studied for resource recovery from wastewater. By taking advantage of interactions between microorganisms and electrodes, BES can accomplish wastewater treatment while simultaneously recovering various resources including nutrients, energy and water (“NEW”). Despite much progress in laboratory studies, BES have not been advanced to practical applications. This paper aims to provide some subjective opinions and a concise discussion of several key challenges in BES-based resource recovery and help identify the potential application niches that may guide further technological development. In addition to further increasing recovery efficiency, it is also important to have more focus on the applications of the recovered resources such as how to use the harvested electricity and gaseous energy and how to separate the recovered nutrients in an energy-efficient way. A change in mindset for energy performance of BES is necessary to understand overall energy production and consumption. Scaling up BES can go through laboratory scale, transitional scale, and then pilot scale. Using functions as driving forces for BES research and development will better guide the investment of efforts.

Keywords

Bioelectrochemical systems Resource recovery Wastewater treatment Energy Nutrients 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS), Virginia Tech.

References

  1. Ahn Y H (2006). Sustainable nitrogen elimination biotechnologies: A review. Process Biochemistry, 41(8): 1709–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennetto H P, Delaney G M, Mason J R, Roller S D, Stirling J L, Thurston C F (1985). The sucrose fuel cell: Efficient biomass conversion using a microbial catalyst. Biotechnology Letters, 7(10): 699–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennetto H P, Stirling J L, Tanaka K, Vega C A (1983). Anodic reactions in microbial fuel cells. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 25(2): 559–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai T, Park S Y, Li Y (2013). Nutrient recovery from wastewater streams by microalgae: Status and prospects. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19: 360–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Call D, Logan B E (2008). Hydrogen production in a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell lacking a membrane. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(9): 3401–3406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cath T Y, Childress A E, Elimelech M (2006). Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of Membrane Science, 281(1–2): 70–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chae K J, Choi M J, Kim K Y, Ajayi F F, Chang I S, Kim I S (2010). Selective inhibition of methanogens for the improvement of biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(24): 13379–13386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng S, Xing D, Call D F, Logan B E (2009). Direct biological conversion of electrical current into methane by electromethanogenesis. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(10): 3953–3958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clauwaert P, Verstraete W (2009). Methanogenesis in membraneless microbial electrolysis cells. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 82(5): 829–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen B (1931). The bacterial culture as an electric half-cell. Journal of Bacteriology, 21(1): 18–19Google Scholar
  11. Cotterill S E, Dolfing J, Jones C, Curtis T P, Heidrich E S (2017). Low temperature domestic wastewater treatment in a microbial electrolysis cell with 1 m2 anodes: Towards system scale-up. Fuel Cells (Weinheim), 17(5): 584–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cusick R D, Bryan B, Parker D S, Merrill M D, Mehanna M, Kiely P D, Liu G, Logan B E (2011). Performance of a pilot-scale continuous flow microbial electrolysis cell fed winery wastewater. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 89(6): 2053–2063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cusick R D, Logan B E (2012). Phosphate recovery as struvite within a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell. Bioresource Technology, 107: 110–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delaney G M, Bennetto H P, Mason J R, Roller S D, Stirling J L, Thurston C F (1984). Electron-transfer coupling in microbial fuel cells. 2. Performance of fuel cells containing selected microorganism‒mediator‒substrate combinations. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 34(1): 13–27Google Scholar
  15. Dong Y, Qu Y, He W, Du Y, Liu J, Han X, Feng Y (2015). A 90-liter stackable baffled microbial fuel cell for brewery wastewater treatment based on energy self-sufficient mode. Bioresource Technology, 195: 66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donovan C, Dewan A, Peng H, Heo D, Beyenal H (2011). Power management system for a 2.5 W remote sensor powered by a sediment microbial fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 196(3): 1171–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. El Diwani G, El Rafie S, El Ibiari N N, El-Aila H I (2007). Recovery of ammonia nitrogen from industrial wastewater treatment as struvite slow releasing fertilizer. Desalination, 214(1–3): 200–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Escapa A, Mateos R, Martínez E J, Blanes J (2016). Microbial electrolysis cells: An emerging technology for wastewater treatment and energy recovery. From laboratory to pilot plant and beyond. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55: 942–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feng Y, He W, Liu J, Wang X, Qu Y, Ren N (2014). A horizontal plug flow and stackable pilot microbial fuel cell for municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology, 156: 132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foley J M, Rozendal R A, Hertle C K, Lant P A, Rabaey K (2010). Life cycle assessment of high-rate anaerobic treatment, microbial fuel cells, and microbial electrolysis cells. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(9): 3629–3637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ge Z, He Z (2012). Effects of draw solutions and membrane conditions on electricity generation and water flux in osmotic microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology, 109: 70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ge Z, He Z (2016). Long-term performance of a 200-L modularized microbial fuel cell system treating municipal wastewater: treatment, energy and cost. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 2(2): 274–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ge Z, Li J, Xiao L, Tong Y, He Z (2014). Recovery of electrical energy in microbial fuel cells. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 1(2): 137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghimire A, Kumar G, Sivagurunathan P, Shobana S, Saratale G D, Kim H W, Luongo V, Esposito G, Munoz R (2017). Bio-hythane production from microalgae biomass: Key challenges and potential opportunities for algal bio-refineries. Bioresource Technology, 241: 525–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. He Z (2013). Microbial fuel cells: Now let us talk about energy. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(1): 332–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. He Z (2017). Development of microbial fuel cells needs to go beyond “power density”. ACS Energy Letters, 2(3): 700–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hiegemann H, Herzer D, Nettmann E, Lübken M, Schulte P, Schmelz K G, Gredigk-Hoffmann S, Wichern M (2016). An integrated 45L pilot microbial fuel cell system at a full-scale wastewater treatment plant. Bioresource Technology, 218: 115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hiegemann H, Lübken M, Schulte P, Schmelz K G, Gredigk-Hoffmann S, Wichern M (2018). Inhibition of microbial fuel cell operation for municipal wastewater treatment by impact loads of free ammonia in bench- and 45L-scale. Science of the Total Environment, 624: 34–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang Z, Lu L, Jiang D, Xing D, Ren Z J (2017). Electrochemical hythane production for renewable energy storage and biogas upgrading. Applied Energy, 187: 595–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ichihashi O, Hirooka K (2012). Removal and recovery of phosphorus as struvite from swine wastewater using microbial fuel cell. Bioresource Technology, 114: 303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karube I, Matsunaga T, Tsuru S, Suzuki S (1977). Biochemical fuel cell utilizing immobilized cells of clostridium butyricum. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 19(11): 1727–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kelly P T, He Z (2014). Nutrients removal and recovery in bioelectrochemical systems: A review. Bioresource Technology, 153: 351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Le Corre K S, Valsami-Jones E, Hobbs P, Parsons S A (2009). Phosphorus recovery from wastewater by struvite crystallization: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 39(6): 433–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee E J, Criddle C S, Bobel P, Freyberg D L (2013). Assessing the scale of resource recovery for centralized and satellite wastewater treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(19): 10762–10770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li J, Ge Z, He Z (2014). A fluidized bed membrane bioelectrochemical reactor for energy-efficient wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology, 167: 310–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li Y, Zhou W, Hu B, Min M, Chen P, Ruan R R (2011). Integration of algae cultivation as biodiesel production feedstock with municipal wastewater treatment: strains screening and significance evaluation of environmental factors. Bioresource Technology, 102(23): 10861–10867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liang P, Wei J, Li M, Huang X (2013). Scaling up a novel denitrifying microbial fuel cell with an oxic-anoxic two stage biocathode. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 7(6): 913–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu H, Logan B E (2004). Electricity generation using an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(14): 4040–4046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liu J, Liu L, Gao B, Yang F, Crittenden J, Ren N (2014). Integration of microbial fuel cell with independent membrane cathode bioreactor for power generation, membrane fouling mitigation and wastewater treatment. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(31): 17865–17872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Logan B E (2010). Scaling up microbial fuel cells and other bioelectrochemical systems. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85(6): 1665–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Logan B E, Regan J M (2006). Electricity-producing bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells. Trends in Microbiology, 14 (12): 512–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lovley D R (2006). Microbial fuel cells: novel microbial physiologies and engineering approaches. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 17 (3): 327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lu L, Hou D, Wang X, Jassby D, Ren Z J (2016). Active H2 harvesting prevents methanogenesis in microbial electrolysis cells. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 3(8): 286–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luo H, Qin B, Liu G, Zhang R, Tang Y, Hou Y (2015). Selective recovery of Cu2+ and Ni2+ from wastewater using bioelectrochemical system. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 9(3): 522–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Luo S, Jain A, Aguilera A, He Z (2017). Effective control of biohythane composition through operational strategies in an innovative microbial electrolysis cell. Applied Energy, 206: 879–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCarty P L, Bae J, Kim J (2011). Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer—Can this be achieved? Environmental Science & Technology, 45(17): 7100–7106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Milledge J J (2011). Commercial application of microalgae other than as biofuels: A brief review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 10(1): 31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pham T H, Aelterman P, Verstraete W (2009). Bioanode performance in bioelectrochemical systems: recent improvements and prospects. Trends in Biotechnology, 27(3): 168–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Potter MC (1911). Electrical effects accompanying the decomposition of organic compounds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (London), 84(571): 260–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Qin M, Abu-Reesh I M, He Z (2016). Effects of current generation and electrolyte pH on reverse salt flux across thin film composite membrane in osmotic microbial fuel cells. Water Research, 105: 583–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Qin M, He Z (2014). Self-supplied ammonium bicarbonate draw solute for achieving wastewater treatment and recovery in a microbial electrolysis cell-forward osmosis-coupled system. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 1(10): 437–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Qin M, He Z (2017). Resource recovery by osmotic bioelectrochemical systems towards sustainable wastewater treatment. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 3(4): 583–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Qin M, Liu Y, Luo S, Qiao R, He Z (2017). Integrated experimental and modeling evaluation of energy consumption for ammonia recovery in bioelectrochemical systems. Chemical Engineering Journal, 327: 924–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Qin M, White C, Zou S, He Z (2018). Passive separation of recovered ammonia from catholyte for reduced energy consumption in microbial electrolysis cells. Chemical Engineering Journal, 334: 2303–2307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rabaey K, Verstraete W (2005). Microbial fuel cells: Novel biotechnology for energy generation. Trends in Biotechnology, 23(6): 291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ren S, Li M, Sun J, Bian Y, Zuo K, Zhang X, Liang P, Huang X (2017). A novel electrochemical reactor for nitrogen and phosphorus recovery from domestic wastewater. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(4): 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rodriguez Arredondo M, Kuntke P, Jeremiasse A W, Sleutels T H J A, Buisman C J N, ter Heijne A (2015). Bioelectrochemical systems for nitrogen removal and recovery from wastewater. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 1(1): 22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ronteltap M, Maurer M, Gujer W (2007). The behaviour of pharmaceuticals and heavy metals during struvite precipitation in urine. Water Research, 41(9): 1859–1868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rozendal R A, Hamelers H V M, Euverink G J W, Metz S J, Buisman C J N (2006). Principle and perspectives of hydrogen production through biocatalyzed electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 31(12): 1632–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rozendal R A, Hamelers H V M, Molenkamp R J, Buisman C J N (2007). Performance of single chamber biocatalyzed electrolysis with different types of ion exchange membranes. Water Research, 41(9): 1984–1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Siegert M, Li X F, Yates M D, Logan B E (2015). The presence of hydrogenotrophic methanogens in the inoculum improves methane gas production in microbial electrolysis cells. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5: 778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sun M, Sheng G P, Zhang L, Xia C R, Mu Z X, Liu X W, Wang H L, Yu H Q, Qi R, Yu T, Yang M (2008). An MEC-MFC-coupled system for biohydrogen production from acetate. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(21): 8095–8100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sun M, Zhai L F, Li W W, Yu H Q (2016). Harvest and utilization of chemical energy in wastes by microbial fuel cells. Chemical Society Reviews, 45(10): 2847–2870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tchobanoglous G, Burton F L, Stensel H D (2002). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. Boston: McGraw-Hill ThompsonGoogle Scholar
  65. Brewster E, Jermakka J, Freguia S, Batstone D J (2017). Modelling recovery of ammonium from urine by electro-concentration in a 3-chamber cell. Water Research, 124: 210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Valentino F, Morgan-Sagastume F, Campanari S, Villano M, Werker A, Majone M (2017). Carbon recovery from wastewater through bioconversion into biodegradable polymers. New Biotechnology, 37(Pt A): 9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Villano M, Scardala S, Aulenta F, Majone M (2013). Carbon and nitrogen removal and enhanced methane production in a microbial electrolysis cell. Bioresource Technology, 130: 366–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wagner R C, Regan J M, Oh S E, Zuo Y, Logan B E (2009). Hydrogen and methane production from swine wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells. Water Research, 43(5): 1480–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang H, Park J D, Ren Z J (2015). Practical energy harvesting for microbial fuel cells: A review. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(6): 3267–3277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang H, Ren Z J (2013). A comprehensive review of microbial electrochemical systems as a platform technology. Biotechnology Advances, 31(8): 1796–1807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wang Y K, Sheng G P, Shi B J, Li W W, Yu H Q (2013). A novel electrochemical membrane bioreactor as a potential net energy producer for sustainable wastewater treatment. Scientific Reports, 3 (1): 1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Xiao Y, Zheng Y, Wu S, Yang Z H, Zhao F (2016). Nitrogen recovery from wastewater using microbial fuel cells. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 10(1): 185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yang Y, Qin M, Yang X, He Z (2017). Sustainable operation of osmotic microbial fuel cells through effective reproduction of polyelectrolyte draw solutes facilitated by cathodic pH increase. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168: 1143–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yang Y, Xiang Y, Xia C, Wu W M, Sun G, Xu M (2014). Physiological and electrochemical effects of different electron acceptors on bacterial anode respiration in bioelectrochemical systems. Bioresource Technology, 164: 270–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yuan H, He Z (2015). Integrating membrane filtration into bioelectrochemical systems as next generation energy-efficient wastewater treatment technologies for water reclamation: A review. Bioresource Technology, 195: 202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yuan Z, Pratt S, Batstone D J (2012). Phosphorus recovery from wastewater through microbial processes. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 23(6): 878–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zamora P, Georgieva T, Ter Heijne A, Sleutels T H J A, Jeremiasse A W, Saakes M, Buisman C J N, Kuntke P (2017). Ammonia recovery from urine in a scaled-up Microbial Electrolysis Cell. Journal of Power Sources, 356: 491–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhang B, He Z (2012). Energy production, use and saving in a bioelectrochemical desalination system. RSC Advances, 2(28): 10673–10679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhang F, Brastad K S, He Z (2011). Integrating forward osmosis into microbial fuel cells for wastewater treatment, water extraction and bioelectricity generation. Environmental Science & Technology, 45 (15): 6690–6696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhou M, Chi M, Luo J, He H, Jin T (2011). An overview of electrode materials in microbial fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 196(10): 4427–4435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zou S, He Z (2018). Efficiently “pumping out” value-added resources from wastewater by bioelectrochemical systems: A review from energy perspectives. Water Research, 131: 62–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zou S, Qin M, Moreau Y, He Z (2017). Nutrient-energy-water recovery from synthetic sidestream centrate using a microbial electrolysis cellforward osmosis hybrid system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 154: 16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations