Advertisement

A critical literature review of bioretention research for stormwater management in cold climate and future research recommendations

  • Hannah Kratky
  • Zhan Li
  • Yijun Chen
  • Chengjin Wang
  • Xiangfei Li
  • Tong Yu
Review Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Low Impact Development and Sponge City

Abstract

Bioretention is a popular best management practice of low impact development that effectively restores urban hydrologic characteristics to those of predevelopment and improves water quality prior to conveyance to surface waters. This is achieved by utilizing an engineered system containing a surface layer of mulch, a thick soil media often amended with a variety of materials to improve water quality, a variety of vegetation, and underdrains, depending on the surrounding soil characteristics. Bioretention systems have been studied quite extensively for warm climate applications, but data strongly supporting their long-term efficacy and application in cold climates is sparse. Although it is apparent that bioretention is an effective stormwater management system, its design in cold climate needs further research. Existing cold climate research has shown that coarser media is required to prevent concrete frost from forming. For spring, summer and fall seasons, if sufficient permeability exists to drain the system prior to freezing, peak flow and volume reduction can be maintained. Additionally, contaminants that are removed via filtration are also not impacted by cold climates. In contrary, dissolved contaminants, nutrients, and organics are significantly more variable in their ability to be removed or degraded via bioretention in colder temperatures.Winter road maintenance salts have been shown to negatively impact the removal of some contaminants and positively impact others, while their effects on properly selected vegetation or bacteria health are also not well understood. Research in these water quality aspects has been inconsistent and therefore requires further study.

Keywords

Nutrients recovery Bioretention Cold climate Low impact development Stormwater 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is financially supported by a Collaborative Research and Development Grant (NSERC CRDPJ 455096-13 Yu) jointly sponsored by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada and the City of Edmonton in Alberta, Canada. It is also partially supported by a Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship from Government of Alberta and by a China Scholarship Council (CSC) Ph.D Scholarship.

References

  1. 1.
    Davis A P, Hunt W F, Traver R G, Clar M. Bioretention technology: overview of current practice and future needs. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009, 135(3): 109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Department of Environmental Resources. Bioretention Manual. Prince George’s County, Maryland, United States: Department of Environmental Resources, 2007,148Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoban A T, Kennedy K. Community perceptions of raingardens in residential streets at Bellvista estate. In: Proceedings of Water Sensitive Urban Design 2012. Melbourne, Australia: Engineers Australia, 2012, 362–369Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jia H F, Yao H R, Yu S L. Advances in LID BMPs research and practice for urban runoff control in China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2013, 7(5): 709–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F.World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 2006, 15(3): 259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peel M C, Finlayson B L, McMahon T A. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2007, 11(5): 1633–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    NRCC (National Research Council of Canada). 2014 Alberta Building Code-Volume 2, Ninth Ed. Ottawa, Canada: NRCC, 2014Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Géhéniau N, Fuamba M, Mahaut V, Gendron M R, Dugué M. Monitoring of a rain garden in cold climate: case study of a parking lot near Montreal. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2015, 141(6): 04014073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oberts G L. Cold climate BMPs: solving the management puzzle. Water Science & Technology, 2003, 48(9): 21–32Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Westerlund C, Viklander M. Particles and associated metals in road runoff during snowmelt and rainfall. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 362(1–3): 143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Viklander M, Malmqvist P A. Melt water from snow deposits. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage 1993. Niagra Falls, Canada: IAHR and IAWQ, 1993, 429–434Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khan U T, Valeo C, Chu A, van Duin B. Bioretention cell efficacy in cold climates: part 2-water quality performance. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2012, 39(11): 1222–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davis A P. Field performance of bioretention: hydrology impacts. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2008, 13(2): 90–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ping L, Tao Y. Low impact development design for urban stormwater management-a case study in USA. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Water Resource and Environmental Protection 2011. Xi’an, China: IEEE, 2011, 2741–2744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roseen R M, Ballestero T P, Houle J J, Avellaneda P, Briggs J, Fowler G, Wildey R. Seasonal performance variations for stormwater management systems in cold climate conditions. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009, 135(3): 128–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khan U T. Bioretention cell efficacy in cold climates. Dissertation for the Master Degree (MR75226). Calgary: University of Calgary, 2011Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muthanna T M, Viklander M, Thorolfsson S T. Seasonal climatic effects on the hydrology of a rain garden. Hydrological Processes, 2008, 22(11): 1640–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    He Z X, Davis A P. Process modeling of storm-water flow in a bioretention cell. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2011, 137(3): 121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nyle C B, Ray R W. The Nature and Properties of Soils. 14th ed. Columbus, United States: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brown R A, Hunt W F. Improving bioretention/biofiltration performance with restorative maintenance. Water Science & Technology, 2012, 65(2): 361–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malek E. Night-time evapotranspiration vs. daytime and 24 h evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology, 1992, 138(1–2): 119–129Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lucas J S, William F, Hunt W F III. Hydrologic and water quality performance of four bioretention cells in central North Carolina. In: Proceedings of Managing Watersheds for Human and Natural Impacts Conference 2005. Williamsburg, United States: ASCE, 2005, 1–12Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Palhegyi G E. Modeling and sizing bioretention using flow duration control. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2010, 15(6): 417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Trowsdale S A, Simcock R. Urban stormwater treatment using bioretention. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2011, 397(3–4): 167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khan U T, Valeo C, Chu A, van Duin B. Bioretention cell efficacy in cold climates: part 1-hydrologic performance. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2012, 39(11): 1210–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Muthanna T M. Bioretention as a sustainable stormwater management option in cold climates. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2007Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paus K H, Morgan J, Gulliver J S, Leiknes T, Hozalski R M. Assessment of the hydraulic and toxic metal removal capacities of bioretention cells after 2 to 8 years of service. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2014, 225(1): 1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hunt W F, Jarrett A R, Smith J T, Sharkey L J. Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2006, 132(6): 600–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Muthanna T M, Viklander M, Gjesdahl N, Thorolfsson S T. Heavy metal removal in cold climate bioretention. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2007, 183(1–4): 391–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Muthanna T M, Viklander M, Thorolfsson S T. An evaluation of applying existing bioretention sizing methods to cold climates with snow storage conditions. Water Science & Technology, 2007, 56 (10): 73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    LeFevre N J, Davidson J D, Oberts G L. Bioretention of simulated snowmelt: cold climate performance and design criteria. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Cold Regions Engineering 2009. Duluth, United States: ASCE, 2009, 145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stoeckeler J H, Weitzman S. Infiltration rates in frozen soils in northern Minnesota. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1960, 24(2): 137–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Denich C, Bradford A, Drake J. Bioretention: assessing effects of winter salt and aggregate application on plant health, media clogging and effluent quality. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 2013, 48(4): 387–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dietz M E. Low impact development practices: a review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2007, 186(1–4): 351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Muthanna T M, Viklander M, Blecken G, Thorolfsson S T. Snowmelt pollutant removal in bioretention areas. Water Research, 2007, 41(18): 4061–4072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Blecken G T, Marsalek J, Viklander M. Laboratory study of stormwater biofiltration in low temperatures: total and dissolved metal removals and fates. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2011, 219 (1–4): 303–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Søberg L C, Viklander M, Blecken G T. Do salt and low temperature impair metal treatment in stormwater bioretention cells with or without a submerged zone? Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 579: 1588–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Moghadas S, Gustafsson A M, Viklander P, Marsalek J, Viklander M. Laboratory study of infiltration into two frozen engineered (sandy) soils recommended for bioretention. Hydrological Processes, 2016, 30(8): 1251–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Søberg L C, Viklander M, Blecken G T. The influence of temperature and salt on metal and sediment removal in stormwater biofilters. Water Science & Technology, 2014, 69(11): 2295–2304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Le Coustumer S, Fletcher T D, Deletic A, Barraud S, Poelsma P. The influence of design parameters on clogging of stormwater biofilters: a large-scale column study. Water Research, 2012, 46 (20): 6743–6752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stephens D B, Miller M, Moore S J, Umstot T, Salvato D J. Decentralized groundwater recharge systems using roofwater and stormwater runoff. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2012, 48(1): 134–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Le Coustumer S, Fletcher T D, Deletic A, Barraud S. Hydraulic performance of biofilters for stormwater management: first lessons from both laboratory and field studies. Water Science & Technology, 2007, 56(10): 93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hatt B E, Fletcher T D, Deletic A. Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media stormwater filtration systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(7): 2535–2541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Li H, Davis A P. Heavy metal capture and accumulation in bioretention media. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(14): 5247–5253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Paus K H, Muthanna T M, Braskerud B C. The hydrological performance of bioretention cells in regions with cold climates: seasonal variation and implications for design. Hydrology Research, 2016, 47(2): 291–304Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bratieres K, Fletcher T D, Deletic A, Zinger Y. Nutrient and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters: a large-scale design optimisation study. Water Research, 2008, 42(14): 3930–3940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fletcher T, Zinger Y, Deletic A, Bratières K. Treatment efficiency of biofilters; results of a large-scale column study. In: Proceedings of the Rainwater and Urban Design 2007. Sydney, Australia: Engineers Australia, 2007, 266–273Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fassam E. Stormwater BMP treatment performance variability for sediment and heavy metals. Separation and Purification Technology, 2012, 84: 95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Brown R A, Hunt W F III. Impacts of media depth on effluent water quality and hydrologic performance of undersized bioretention cells. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2011, 137(3): 132–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Water M. Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) Engineering Procedures-Stormwater. Collingwood, Australia: CSIRO Publishing, 2005Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Blecken G T, Zinger Y, Deletic A, Fletcher T D, Hedstrom A, Viklander M. Laboratory study on stormwater biofiltration: nutrient and sediment removal in cold temperatures. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 394(3–4): 507–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Blecken G T, Zinger Y, Muthanna T M, Deletic A, Fletcher T D, Viklander M. The influence of temperature on nutrient treatment efficiency in stormwater biofilter systems. Water Science & Technology, 2007, 56(10): 83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Szota C, Farrell C, Livesley S J, Fletcher T D. Salt tolerant plants increase nitrogen removal from biofiltration systems affected by saline stormwater. Water Research, 2015, 83: 195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    HouseW A, Jickells T D, Edwards A C, Praska K E, Denison F H. Reactions of phosphorus with sediments in fresh and marine waters. Soil Use and Management, 1998, 14(s4): 139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Davis A P, Shokouhian M, Ni S. Loading estimates of lead, copper, cadmium, and zinc in urban runoff from specific sources. Chemosphere, 2001, 44(5): 997–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lim H S, Lim W, Hu J Y, Ziegler A, Ong S L. Comparison of filter media materials for heavy metal removal from urban stormwater runoff using biofiltration systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 147: 24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Dean C M, Sansalone J J, Cartledge F K, Pardue J H. Influence of hydrology on rainfall-runoff metal element speciation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2005, 131(4): 632–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rieuwerts J S, Thornton I, Farago M E, Ashmore M R. Factors influencing metal bioavailability in soils: preliminary investigations for the development of a critical loads approach for metals. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability, 1998, 10(2): 61–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bradl H B. Adsorption of heavy metal ions on soils and soils constituents. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2004, 277 (1): 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hatt B E, Steinel A, Deletic A, Fletcher T D. Retention of heavy metals by stormwater filtration systems: breakthrough analysis. Water Science & Technology, 2011, 64(9): 1913–1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Clark S, Pitt R. Filtered metals control in stormwater using engineered media. In: Proceedings of World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011. Palm Spings, United States: ASCE, 2011, 415–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Blecken G T, Zinger Y, Deletic A, Fletcher T D, Viklander M. Impact of a submerged zone and a carbon source on heavy metal removal in stormwater biofilters. Ecological Engineering, 2009, 35 (5): 769–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ponizovsky A A, Thakali S, Allen H E, Di Toro D M, Ackerman A J. Effect of soil properties on copper release in soil solutions at low moisture content. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2006, 25(3): 671–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yin Y, Impellitteri C A, You S J, Allen H E. The importance of organic matter distribution and extract soil:solution ratio on the desorption of heavy metals from soils. Science of the Total Environment, 2002, 287(1–2): 107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Temminghoff E J M, Van der Zee S E A T M, de Haan F A M. Copper mobility in a copper-contaminated sandy soil as affected by pH and solid and dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science & Technology, 1997, 31(4): 1109–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Warren L A, Haack E A. Biogeochemical controls on metal behaviors in freshwater environments. Earth-Science Reviews, 2001, 54(4): 261–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Blecken G T, Zinger Y, Deletic A, Fletcher T D, Viklander M. Influence of intermittent wetting and drying conditions on heavy metal removal by stormwater biofilters. Water Research, 2009, 43 (18): 4590–4598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zhang Z, Rengel Z, Liaghati T, Torre A, Meney K. Influence of plant species and submerged zone with carbon addition on the removal of metals by stormwater biofilters. Desalination andWater Treatment, 2014, 52(22–24): 4282–4291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Paus K H, Morgan J, Gulliver J S, Leiknes T, Hozalski R M. Effects of temperature and NaCl on toxic metal retention in bioretention media. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 140(10): 04014034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Paus K H, Morgan J, Gulliver J S, Hozalski R M. Effects of bioretention media compost volume fraction on toxic metals removal, hydraulic conductivity, and phosphorous release. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 140(10): 04014033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Bäckström M, Viklander M. Integrated stormwater management in cold climates. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 2000, 35(8): 1237–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Yao K M, Habibian M T, O’Melia C R. Water and waste water filtration. Concepts and applications. Environmental Science & Technology, 1971, 5(11): 1105–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sun X. Dynamic study of heavy metal fates in bioretention systems. Dissertation for the Master Degree (1421420). College Park: University of Maryland, 2004Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Antoniadis V, Alloway B J. Availability of Cd, Ni and Zn to ryegrass in sewage sludge-treated soils at different temperatures. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2001, 132(3–4): 201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hooda P S, Alloway B J. Effects of time and temperature on the bioavailability of Cd and Pb from sludge-amended soils. Journal of Soil Science, 1993, 44(1): 97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ledin M. Accumulation of metals by microorganisms—processes and importance for soil systems. Earth-Science Reviews, 2000, 51 (1–4): 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bremer P J, Geesey G G. Interactions of Bacteria with Metals in the Aquatic Environment. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers, 1993, 41–63Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Goodison B E, Louie P Y T, Metcalfe J R. Snowmelt acidic shock study in South Central Ontario. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1986, 31(1–2): 131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Warren L A, Zimmerman A P. The influence of temperature and NaCl on cadmium, copper and zinc partitioning among suspended particulate and dissolved phases in an urban river. Water Research, 1994, 28(9): 1921–1931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Marsalek J. Road salts in urban stormwater: an emerging issue in stormwater management in cold climates. Water Science & Technology, 2003, 48(9): 61–70Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Calmano W, Ahlf W, Bening J C. Chemical mobility and bioavailability of sediment-bound heavy metals influenced by salinity. Hydrobiologia, 1992, 235–236(1): 605–610Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Bäckström M, Karlsson S, Bäckman L, Folkeson L, Lind B. Mobilisation of heavy metals by deicing salts in a roadside environment. Water Research, 2004, 38(3): 720–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Amrhein C, Strong J E, Mosher P A. Effect of deicing salts on metal and organic matter mobilization in roadside soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 1992, 26(4): 703–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Benjamin M M. Water Chemistry: Water Resources and Environ-mental Engineering. New York, United States: McGraw-Hill, 2002Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Roy-Poirier A, Champagne P, Filion Y. Bioretention processes for phosphorus pollution control. Environmental Reviews, 2010, 18: 159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Zhang Z, Rengel Z, Liaghati T, Antoniette T, Meney K. Influence of plant species and submerged zone with carbon addition on nutrient removal in stormwater biofilter. Ecological Engineering, 2011, 37(11): 1833–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Treese D P, Clark S E, Baker K H. Nutrient release from disturbance of infiltration system soils during construction. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2012, 2012: Article ID 393164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    O’Neill S W. Use of drinking water treatment residuals as a soil amendment for stormwater nutrient treatment. Dissertation for the Master Degree (1482504). College Park: University of Maryland, 2010Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Lucas W C, Greenway M. Phosphorus retention by bioretention mesocosms using media formulated for phosphorus sorption: response to accelerated loads. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2011, 137(3): 144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Oberts G L. Pollutants associated with sand and salt applied to roads in Minnesota. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1986, 22(3): 479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Yang H, McCoy E L, Grewal P S, Dick W A. Dissolved nutrients and atrazine removal by column-scale monophasic and biphasic rain garden model systems. Chemosphere, 2010, 80(8): 929–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Erickson A J, Gulliver J S, Weiss P T. Enhanced sand filtration for storm water phosphorus removal. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2007, 133(5): 485–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Gardner B R, Jones J P. Effects of temperature on phosphate sorption isotherms and phosphate desorption. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1973, 4(2): 83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Barrow N J, Shaw T C. The slow reactions between soil and anions: 2. Effect of time and temperature on the decrease in phosphate concentration in the soil solution. Soil Science, 1975, 119(2): 167–177Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Lucas W C, Greenway M. Nutrient retention in vegetated and nonvegetated bioretention mesocosms. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2008, 134(5): 613–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Barrett M E, Limouzin M, Lawler D F. Effects of media and plant selection on biofiltration performance. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 139(4): 462–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Henderson C, Greenway M, Phillips I. Removal of dissolved nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon from stormwater by biofiltration mesocosms. Water Science & Technology, 2007, 55(4): 183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Payne E G I, Fletcher T D, Russell D G, Grace M R, Cavagnaro T R, Evrard V, Deletic A, Hatt B E, Cook P L M. Temporary storage or permanent removal? The division of nitrogen between biotic assimilation and denitrification in stormwater biofiltration systems. PLoS One, 2014, 9(3): e90890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Read J, Fletcher T D, Wevill T, Deletic A. Plant traits that enhance pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 2009, 12(1): 34–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Dietz M E, Clausen J C. A field evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2005, 167(1–4): 123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Lucas W C, Greenway M. Hydraulic response and nitrogen retention in bioretention mesocosms with regulated outlets: part II–nitrogen retention. Water Environment Research, 2011, 83(8): 703–713Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Kim H, Seagren E A, Davis A P. Engineered bioretention for removal of nitrate from stormwater runoff. Water Environment Research, 2003, 75(4): 355–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Malhi S S, McGill W B. Nitrification in three Alberta soils: effect of temperature, moisture and substrate concentration. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1982, 14(4): 393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Russell C A, Fillery I R P, Bootsma N, McInnes K J. Effect of temperature and nitrogen source on nitrification in a sandy soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2002, 33(11–12): 1975–1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Endreny T, Burke D J, Burchhardt K M, Fabian M W, Kretzer A M. Bioretention column study of bacteria community response to salt-enriched artificial stormwater. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2012, 41(6): 1951–1959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Reay D S, Nedwell D B, Priddle J, Ellis-Evans J C. Temperature dependence of inorganic nitrogen uptake: reduced affinity for nitrate at suboptimal temperatures in both algae and bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1999, 65(6): 2577–2584Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Juang T C,WangMK, Chen H J, Tan C C. Ammonium fixation by surface soils and clays. Soil Science, 2001, 166(5): 345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Tremante V J. The effects of organic soil amendments in bioretention soil mixes on the removal of total petroleum hydrocarbons. Dissertation of the Master Degree. Columbus: The Ohio State University, 2005Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Hong E, Seagren E A, Davis A P. Sustainable oil and grease removal from synthetic stormwater runoff using bench-scale bioretention studies. Water Environment Research, 2006, 78(2): 141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Li H, Davis A P. Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009, 135(8): 567–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Mayer T, Snodgrass W J, Morin D. Spatial characterization of the occurrence of road salts and their environmental concentrations as chlorides in Canadian surface waters and benthic sediments. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 1999, 34(4): 545–574Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Ramakrishna D M, Viraraghavan T. Environmental impact of chemical deicers–a review. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2005, 166(1–4): 49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Williams D D, Williams N E, Cao Y. Road salt contamination of groundwater in a major metropolitan area and development of a biological index to monitor its impact. Water Research, 2000, 34 (1): 127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Environment Canada (EC). Code of Practice for Environmental Management of Road Salts. Ottawa, Canada: Environment Canada, 2004Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Norrström A C, Bergstedt E. The impact of road de-icing salts (NaCl) on colloid dispersion and base cation pools in roadside soils. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2001, 127(1–4): 281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Suarez D L, Wood J D, Lesch S M. Infiltration into cropped soils: effect of rain and sodium adsorption ratio-impacted irrigation water. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2008, 37(5_Supp): S169–S179Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Fritioff A, Kautsky L, Greger M. Influence of temperature and salinity on heavy metal uptake by submersed plants. Environmental Pollution, 2005, 133(2): 265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Marschner H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Academic Press, 1995Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Yuan B C, Li Z Z, Liu H, Gao M, Zhang Y Y. Microbial biomass and activity in salt affected soils under arid conditions. Applied Soil Ecology, 2007, 35(2): 319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Hsieh C H, Davis A P, Needelman B A. Bioretention column studies of phosphorus removal from urban stormwater runoff. Water Environment Research, 2007, 79(2): 177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Denich C J. Assessing the performance of bioretention under cold climate conditions. Dissertation of the Master Degree (MR52218). Guelph: University of Guelph, 2009Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hannah Kratky
    • 1
  • Zhan Li
    • 1
  • Yijun Chen
    • 1
  • Chengjin Wang
    • 1
  • Xiangfei Li
    • 2
  • Tong Yu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.City Planning, City of EdmontonEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations