Diffusion of municipal wastewater treatment technologies in China: a collaboration network perspective

Research Article

Abstract

The diffusion of municipal wastewater treatment technology is vital for urban environment in developing countries. China has built more than 3000 municipal wastewater treatment plants in the past three decades, which is a good chance to understand how technologies diffused in reality.We used a data-driven approach to explore the relationship between the diffusion of wastewater treatment technologies and collaborations between organizations. A database of 3136 municipal wastewater treatment plants and 4634 collaborating organizations was built and transformed into networks for analysis. We have found that: 1) the diffusion networks are assortative, and the patterns of diffusion vary across technologies; while the collaboration networks are fragmented, and have an assortativity around zero since the 2000s. 2) Important projects in technology diffusion usually involve central organizations in collaboration networks, but organizations become more central in collaboration by doing circumstantial projects in diffusion. 3) The importance of projects in diffusion can be predicted with a Random Forest model at a good accuracy and precision level. Our findings provide a quantitative understanding of the technology diffusion processes, which could be used for waterrelevant policy-making and business decisions.

Keywords

Innovation diffusion Collaboration network Wastewater treatment plant Complex network Data driven 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was conducted with financial support from the Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (No. 20121088096) and the Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (Nos. 2012ZX07203-004 and 2012ZX07301-005). We also thank Mr. Tao FU in Peking University for his help in the data collection and analysis.

Supplementary material

11783_2017_903_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (127 kb)
Supporting information

References

  1. 1.
    Lofrano G, Brown J. Wastewater management through the ages: a history of mankind. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408(22): 5254–5264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dechezleprêtre A, Hašcic I, Johnstone N. Invention and International Diffusion of Water Conservation and Availability Technologies: Evidence from Patent Data. Paris: OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 82, OECD Publishing, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Bureau of Statistics of China. Statistical Communiqué of the People’s Republic of China On the 2014 National Economic and Social Development. Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2015 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China. Construction and Operation Report of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facilities in 2014 Fourth Quarter. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China, 2015 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Qu J, Fan M. The current state of water quality and technology development for water pollution control in China. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2010, 40(6): 519–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jin L, Zhang G, Tian H. Current state of sewage treatment in China. Water Research, 2014, 66(1): 85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Choi J, Chung J, Lee D. Risk perception analysis: participation in China’s water PPP market. International Journal of Project Management, 2010, 28(6): 580–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jang W, Lee D, Choi J. Identifying the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats to TOT and divestiture business models in China’s water market. International Journal of Project Management, 2014, 32(2): 298–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Du J, Fan Y, Qian X. Occurrence and behavior of pharmaceuticals in sewage treatment plants in eastern China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2015, 9(4): 725–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun Y, Lu Y, Wang T, Ma H, He G. Pattern of patent-based environmental technology innovation in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2008, 75(7): 1032–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kemp R, Volpi M. The diffusion of clean technologies: a review with suggestions for future diffusion analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2008, 16(1): S14–S21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peres R, Muller E, Mahajan V. Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: a critical review and research directions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2010, 27(2): 91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stoneman P, Battisti G. The diffusion of new technology. In: Hall B, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Vol. 2, 1st ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2010, 733–760Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hammar H, Löfgren Å. Explaining adoption of end of pipe solutions and clean technologies–determinants of firms’ investments for reducing emissions to air in four sectors in Sweden. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(7): 3644–3651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Galán J, Olmo R, López-Paredes A. Diffusion of domestic water conservation technologies in an ABM-GIS integrated model. In: Corchado E, Abraham A, Pedrycz W, eds. Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, 567–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Delre S A, Jager W, Bijmolt T H A, Janssen M A. Will it spread or not? The effects of social influences and network topology on innovation diffusion. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010, 27(2): 267–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Allan C, Jaffe A B, Sin I. Diffusion of green technology: a survey. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2014, 7(1): 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Andersen M M, Foxon T J. The greening of innovation systems for eco-innovation–Towards an Evolutionary Climate Mitigation Policy. In: Proceedings of the Druid Summer Conference 2009. Denmark: DRUID Society, 2009Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bass F M. A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 1969, 15(5): 215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chu J, Wang H, Wang C. Exploring price effects on the residential water conservation technology diffusion process: a case study of Tianjin city. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2013, 7(5): 688–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kiesling E, Günther M, Stummer C, Wakolbinger LM. Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2012, 20(2): 183–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schwarz N, Ernst A. Agent-based modeling of the diffusion of environmental innovations — An empirical approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2009, 76(4): 497–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goetzke F, Rave T, Triebswetter U. Diffusion of environmental technologies: a patent citation analysis of glass melting and glass burners. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2012, 14(2): 189–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hall B H, Helmers C. Innovation and diffusion of clean/green technology: can patent commons help? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2013, 66(1): 33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gomez-Rodriguez M, Leskovec J, Krause A. Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2012, 5(4): 1–37 (TKDD)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brunson J C, Fassino S, Mc Innes A, Narayan M, Richardson B, Franck C, Ion P, Laubenbacher R. Evolutionary events in a mathematical sciences research collaboration network. Scientometrics, 2014, 99(3): 973–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim J, Perez C. Co-authorship network analysis in industrial ecology research community. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2015, 19(2): 222–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Newman M E. Mixing patterns in networks. Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2003, 67(2): 026126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Newman M. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T. The Pagerank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Technical Report. Stanford: Stanford InfoLab, 1999Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kitsak M, Gallos L K, Havlin S, Liljeros F, Muchnik L, Stanley H E, Makse H A. Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nature Physics, 2010, 6(11): 888–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Freeman L C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 1977, 40(1): 35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sarig L E, Pfitzner R, Scholtes I, Garas A, Schweitzer F. Predicting scientific success based on coauthorship networks. EPJ Data Science, 2014, 3(1): 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Newman M. The first-mover advantage in scientific publication. EPL, 2009, 86(6): 68001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of EnvironmentTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and TechnologyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations