Development of source profiles and their application in source apportionment of PM2.5 in Xiamen, China

  • Ningning Zhang
  • Mazhan Zhuang
  • Jie Tian
  • Pengshan Tian
  • Jieru Zhang
  • Qiyuan Wang
  • Yaqing Zhou
  • Rujin Huang
  • Chongshu Zhu
  • Xuemin Zhang
  • Junji Cao
Research Article
  • 42 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Understanding the processes of air pollution formation (Responsible Editors: Min SHAO, Shuxiao WANG & Armistead G. RUSSELL)

Abstract

Ambient PM2.5 samples were collected at four sites in Xiamen, including Gulangyu (GLY), Hongwen (HW), Huli (HL) and Jimei (JM) during January, April, July and October 2013. Local source samples were obtained from coal burning power plants, industries, motor vehicles, biomass burning, fugitive dust, and sea salt for the source apportionment studies. The highest value of PM2.5 mass concentration and species related to human activities (SO42–, NO3, Pb, Ni, V, Cu, Cd, organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC)) were found in the ambient samples from HL, and the highest and lowest loadings of PM2.5 and its components occurred in winter and summer, respectively. The reconstructed mass balance indicated that ambient PM2.5 consisted of 24% OM (organic matter), 23% sulfate, 14% nitrate, 9% ammonium, 9% geological material, 6% sea salt, 5% EC and 10% others. For the source profiles, the dominant components were OC for coal burning, motor vehicle, biomass burning and sea salt; SO42– for industry; and crustal elements for fugitive dust. Source contributions were calculated using a chemical mass balance (CMB) model based on ambient PM2.5 concentrations and the source profiles. GLY was characterized by high contributions from secondary sulfate and cooking, while HL and JM were most strongly affected by motor vehicle emissions, and biomass burning and fugitive dust, respectively. The CMB results indicated that PM2.5 from Xiamen is composed of 27.4% secondary inorganic components, 20.8% motor vehicle emissions, 11.7% fugitive dust, 9.9% sea salt, 9.3% coal burning, 5.0% biomass burning, 3.1% industry and 6.8% others.

Keywords

PM2.5 Source profile Source apportionment CMB Xiamen 

References

  1. 1.
    Cao J J, Wang Q Y, Chow J C, Watson J G, Tie X X, Shen Z X, Wang P, An Z S. Impacts of aerosol compositions on visibility impairment in Xi’an, China. Atmospheric Environment, 2012, 59: 559–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang Q, Cao J, Tao J, Li N, Su X, Chen L W A, Wang P, Shen Z, Liu S, Dai W. Long-term trends in visibility and at Chengdu, China. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(7): e68894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dockery D W, Pope C A 3rd, Xu X, Spengler J D, Ware J H, Fay M E, Ferris B G Jr, Speizer F E. An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. New England Journal of Medicine, 1993, 329(24): 1753–1759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cao J, Xu H, Xu Q, Chen B, Kan H. Fine particulate matter constituents and cardiopulmonary mortality in a heavily polluted Chinese city. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2012, 120(3): 373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matson P, Lohse K A, Hall S J. The globalization of nitrogen deposition: consequences for terrestrial ecosystems. Ambio, 2002, 31(2): 113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cao J J. PM2.5 and the Environment in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2014, 4–5Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Canonaco F, Crippa M, Slowik J G, Baltensperger U, Prévôt A S H. SoFi, an IGOR-based interface for the efficient use of the generalized multilinear engine (ME-2) for the source apportionment: ME-2 application to aerosol mass spectrometer data. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2013, 6(12): 3649–3661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wen W, Cheng S Y, Liu L, Wang G, Wang X Q. Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Tangshan, China—Hybrid approaches for primary and secondary species apportionment. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(5): 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guo H, Wang T, Louie P K K. Source apportionment of ambient non-methane hydrocarbons in Hong Kong: application of a principal component analysis/absolute principal component scores (PCA/APCS) receptor model. Environmental Pollution, 2004, 129(3): 489–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paatero P, Tapper U. Analysis of different modes of factor analysis as least squares fit Problem. Chemo metries and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1993, 18, 183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hidy G M, Friedlander S K. The Nature of the Los Angeles Aerosol. In: Proceedings of the Second International Clean Air Congress. New York: Academic Press, 1971, 391–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Henry R C. History and fundamentals of multivariate air quality receptor models. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1997, 37(1): 37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Banerjee T, Murari V, Kumar M, Raju M P. Source apportionment of airborne particulates through receptor modeling: Indian scenario. Atmospheric Research, 2015, 164–165: 167–187Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Samara C, Kouimtzis T, Tsitouridou R, Kanias G, Simeonov V. Chemical mass balance source apportionment of PM10 in an industrialized urban area of Northern Greece. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37(1): 41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yin J X, Harrison R M, Chen Q, Rutter A, Schauer J J. Source apportionment of fine particles at urban background and rural sites in the UK atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44(6): 841–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zheng M, Zhang Y J, Yan C Q, Fu H Y, Niu H Y, Huang K, Hu M, Zeng L M, Liu Q Z, Pei B, Fu Q Y. Establishing PM2.5 industrial source profiles in Shanghai. China. Environmental Sciences, 2013, 33(8): 1354–1359(in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li T C, ChenW H, Yuan C S, Wu S P, Wang X H. Physicochemical characteristics and source apportionment of atmospheric aerosol particles in Kinmen-Xiamen Airshed. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2013, 13: 308–323Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang F W, Xu L L, Chen J S, Yu Y K, Niu Z C, Yin L Q. Chemical compositions and extinction coefficients of PM2.5 in peri-urban of Xiamen, China, during June 2009–May 2010. Atmospheric Research, 2012, 106: 150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhao J P, Zhang F W, Xu Y, Chen J S, Yin L Q, Shang X S, Xu L L. Chemical characteristics of particulate matter during a heavy dust episode in a coastal city, Xiamen. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2011, 11: 299–308Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang X M. Source apportionment of inhalable particulates in air of Xiamen City. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 30(11): 51–69Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen Y. Characterization of Cooking Fumes in Hong Kong. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2007, 49–60Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huang R J, Zhang Y, Bozzetti C, Ho K F, Cao J J, Han Y, Daellenbach K R, Slowik J G, Platt S M, Canonaco F, Zotter P, Wolf R, Pieber S M, Bruns E A, Crippa M, Ciarelli G, Piazzalunga A, Schwikowski M, Abbaszade G, Schnelle-Kreis J, Zimmermann R, An Z, Szidat S, Baltensperger U, El Haddad I, Prévôt A S H. High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China. Nature, 2014, 514(7521): 218–222Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhuang M Z. Research on chemical characteristics of Xiamen fine air particles. Modern Scientific Instruments, 2007, 5: 113–115(in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xiao Z M, Bi X H, Feng Y C, Wang Y Q, Zhou J, Fu X Q, Weng Y B. Source apportionment of ambient PM10 and PM2.5 in urban area of Ningbo City. Recearch of Environmental Science, 2012, 25(5): 549–555(in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chow J C, Watson J G, Kuhns H, Etyemezian V, Lowenthal D H, Crow D, Kohl S D, Engelbrecht J P, Green M C. Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study. Chemosphere, 2004, 54 (2): 185–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Watson J G, Chow J C, Houck J E. PM2.5 chemical source profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995. Chemsphere, 2001, 43(8): 1141–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yatkin S, Bayram A. Determination of major natural and anthropogenic source profiles for particulate matter and trace elements in Izmir, Turkey. Chemosphere, 2008, 71(4): 685–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Watson J G, Chow J C, Lowenthal D H, Pritchett L C, Frazier C A, Neuroth G R, Robbins R. Differences in the carbon composition of source profiles for diesel- and gasoline-powered vehicles. Atmospheric Environment, 1994 b, 28(15): 2493–2505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Demirbas A. Potential applications of renewable energy sources biomass combustion problem in boiler power systerm and combustion related environmental issues. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2005, 31(2): 171–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ni H Y, Han Y M, Cao J J, Chen A C, Tian J, Wang X L, Chow J C, Watson J G, Wang Q Y, Wang P, Li H, Huang R J. Emission characteristics of carbonaceous particles and trace gases from open burning of crop residues in China. Atomospheric Environment, 2015, 123(B): 399–406Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cao J J, Chow J C, Waston J G, Wu F, Han Y M, Jin Z D, Shen Z X, An Z S. Size-differentiated source profiles for fugitive dust in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(10): 2261–2275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ho K F, Lee S C, Chow J C, Waston J G. Characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 source profiles for fugitive dust in Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37(8): 1023–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zheng M, Salmon L G, Schauer J J, Zeng L M, Kiang C S, Zhang Y H, Cass G R. Seasonal trends in PM2.5 source contributions in Beijing, China. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39(22): 3967–3976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yu L D, Wang G F, Zhang R J, Zhang L M, Song Y,Wu B B, Li X F, An K, Chu J H. Characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 in an urban environment in Beijing. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2013, 13: 574–583Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ningning Zhang
    • 1
  • Mazhan Zhuang
    • 2
  • Jie Tian
    • 1
  • Pengshan Tian
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jieru Zhang
    • 2
  • Qiyuan Wang
    • 1
  • Yaqing Zhou
    • 1
  • Rujin Huang
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  • Chongshu Zhu
    • 1
  • Xuemin Zhang
    • 2
  • Junji Cao
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Aerosol Chemistry and Physics, Institute of Earth EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesXi’anChina
  2. 2.Xiamen Environmental Monitoring Central StationXiamenChina
  3. 3.IER Environmental Protection Engineering Technique, Co., Ltd.ShenzhenChina
  4. 4.Laboratory of Atmospheric ChemistryPaul Scherrer Institute (PSI)VilligenSwitzerland
  5. 5.Centre for Atmospheric and Environmental StudiesXiamen Huaxia UniversityXiamenChina
  6. 6.Institute of Global Environmental ChangeXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations