Advertisement

Wastewater-nitrogen removal using polylactic acid/starch as carbon source: Optimization of operating parameters using response surface methodology

  • Yan Guo
  • Chuanfu Wu
  • Qunhui WangEmail author
  • Min Yang
  • Qiqi Huang
  • Markus Magep
  • Tianlong Zheng
Research Article

Abstract

Nitrogen removal from ammonium-containing wastewater was conducted using polylactic acid (PLA)/starch blends as carbon source and carrier for functional bacteria. The exclusive and interactive influences of operating parameters (i.e., temperature, pH, stirring rate, and PLA-to-starch ratio (PLA proportion)) on nitrification (Y 1), denitrification (Y 2), and COD release rates (Y 3) were investigated through response surface methodology. Experimental results indicated that nitrogen removal could be successfully achieved in the PLA/starch blends through simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. The carbon release rate of the blends was controllable. The sensitivity of Y 1, Y 2, and Y 3 to different operating parameters also differed. The sequence for each response was as follows: for Y 1, pH>stirring rate>PLA proportion>temperature; for Y 2, pH>PLA proportion>temperature> stirring rate; and for Y 3, stirring rate>pH>PLA proportion>temperature. In this study, the following optimum conditions were observed: temperature, 32.0°C; pH 7.7; stirring rate, 200.0 r ∙min–1; and PLA proportion, 0.4. Under these conditions, Y 1, Y 2, and Y 3 were 134.0 μg-N∙gblend–1∙h–1, 160.9 μg-N∙g-blend–1∙h–1, and 7.6 × 103 μg-O∙g-blend–1∙h–1, respectively. These results suggested that the PLA/starch blends may be an ideal packing material for nitrogen removal.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Nitrogen removal Polylactic acid Starch Carbon source Response surface methodology 

References

  1. 1.
    Li X, Shi H, Li K, Zhang L. Combined process of biofiltration and ozone oxidation as an advanced treatment process for wastewater reuse. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2015, 9(6): 1076–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hocaoglu S M, Insel G, Cokgor E U, Orhon D. Effect of sludge age on simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(12): 6665–6672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chu L, Wang J. Comparison of polyurethane foam and biodegradable polymer as carriers in moving bed biofilm reactor for treating wastewater with a low C/N ratio. Chemosphere, 2011, 83(1): 63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shen Z, Wang J. Biological denitrification using cross-linked starch/ PCL blends as solid carbon source and biofilm carrier. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(19): 8835–8838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao X, Meng X, Wang J. Biological denitrification of drinking water using biodegradable polymer. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 2009, 38(3): 328–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhou H, Zhao X, Wang J. Nitrate removal from groundwater using biodegradable polymers as carbon source and biofilm support. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 2009, 38(3): 339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chu L, Wang J. Nitrogen removal using biodegradable polymers as carbon source and biofilm carriers in a moving bed biofilm reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 170(1): 220–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aslan Ü, Türkman A E. Combined biological removal of nitrate and pesticides using wheat straw as substrates. Process Biochemistry, 2005, 40(2): 935–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soares M I M, Abeliovich A. Wheat straw as substrate for water denitrification. Water Research, 1998, 32(12): 3790–3794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Volokita M, Abehovich A, Soares M I M. Denitrification of groundwater using cotton as energy source. Water Science and Technology, 1996, 34(1–2): 379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Volokita M, Belkin S, Abeliovich A, Soares M I M. Biological denitrification of drinking water using newspaper. Water Research, 1996, 30(4): 965–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hiraishi A, Khan S T. Application of polyhydroxyalkanoates for denitrification in water and wastewater treatment. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2003, 61(2): 103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang X, Wang J. Removal of nitrate from groundwater by heterotrophic denitrification using the solid carbon source. Science In China Series B-Chemistry, 2009, 52(2): 236–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhou H, Zhao X, Wang J. Poly (epsilon-caprolactone) as substrate for water denitrification. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 2009, 38(3): 349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boley A, Müller WR. Denitrification with polycaprolactone as solid substrate in a laboratory-scale recirculated aquaculture system. Water Science and Technology, 2005, 52(10–11): 495–502Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aslan S, Türkman A. Biological denitrification of drinking water using various natural organic solid substrates. Water Science and Technology, 2003, 48(11–12): 489–495Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matzinos P, Tserki V, Kontoyiannis A, Panayiotou C. Processing and characterization of starch/polycaprolactone products. Polymer Degradation & Stability, 2002, 77(1): 17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shen Z, Zhou Y, Wang J. Comparison of denitrification performance and microbial diversity using starch/polylactic acid blends and ethanol as electron donor for nitrate removal. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 131(3): 33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu C, Tang D, Wang Q, Wang J, Liu J, Guo Y, Liu S. Comparison of denitrification performances using PLA/starch with different mass ratios as carbon source. Water Science and Technology, 2015, 71(7): 1019–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fan Z X, Wang J L. [Denitrification using polylactic acid as solid carbon source]. Huan Jing Ke Xue, 2009, 30(8): 2315–2319Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kokufuta E, Shimohashi M, Nakamura I. Simultaneously occurring nitrification and denitrification under oxygen gradient by polyelectrolyte complex-coimmobilized Nitrosomonas europaea and Paracoccus denitrificans cells. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1988, 31(4): 382–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Santos V A P M, Bruijnse M, Tramper J, Wijffels R H. The magicbead concept: an integrated approach to nitrogen removal with coimmobilized micro-organisms. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1996, 45(4): 447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cao G M, Zhang T. Study on single-stage biodenitrification by immobilized cells. China Environmentalence, 2000Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Box G E P, Wilson K B. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Springer Series in Statistics, 1992, 13(1): 1–45Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Myers R H, Montgomery D C. Response Surface Methodology, 1988, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Richard F G. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Technometrics, 1996, 38(3): 284–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liyana-Pathirana C, Shahidi F. Optimization of extraction of phenolic compounds from wheat using response surface methodology. Food Chemistry, 2005, 93(1): 47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sakuma T, Jinsiriwanit S, Hattori T, Deshusses M A. Removal of ammonia from contaminated air in a biotrickling filter—denitrifying bioreactor combination system. Water Research, 2008, 42(17): 4507–4513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gilcreas F W. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation’s Health, 2012, 56(3): 113–117Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li B, Irvin S. The comparison of alkalinity and ORP as indicators for nitrification and denitrification in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR). Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2007, 34(3): 248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang C, Zhang S, Zhang L, Rong H, Zhang K. Effects of constant pH and unsteady pH at different free ammonia concentrations on shortcut nitrification for landfill leachate treatment. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2015, 99(8): 3707–3713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cameron S G, Schipper L A. Nitrate removal and hydraulic performance of organic carbon for use in denitrification beds. Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36(11): 1588–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rai C, Majumdar G C, De S. Optimization of Process Parameters for Water Extraction of Stevioside using Response Surface Methodology. Separation Science and Technology, 2012, 47(7): 1014–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Do H, Lim J, Shin S G, Wu Y, Ahn J, Hwang S. Simultaneous effect of temperature, cyanide and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria concentrations on ammonia oxidation. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2008, 35(11): 1331–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yan Guo
    • 1
  • Chuanfu Wu
    • 1
  • Qunhui Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Min Yang
    • 1
  • Qiqi Huang
    • 1
  • Markus Magep
    • 1
  • Tianlong Zheng
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations