Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 171–179 | Cite as

Treatment, residual chlorine and season as factors affecting variability of trihalomethanes in small drinking water systems

  • Roberta Dyck
  • Geneviève Cool
  • Manuel Rodriguez
  • Rehan Sadiq
Research Article

Abstract

Seasonal variability in source water can lead to challenges for drinking water providers related to operational optimization and process control in treatment facilities. The objective of this study is to investigate seasonal variability of water quality in municipal small water systems (<3000 residents) supplied by surface waters. Residual chlorine and trihalomethanes (THM) were measured over seven years (2003–2009). Comparisons are made within each system over time, as well as between systems according to the type of their treatment technologies. THM concentrations are generally higher in the summer and autumn. The seasonal variability was generally more pronounced in systems using chlorination plus additional treatment. Chloroform, total THM (TTHM) and residual chlorine concentrations were generally lower in systems using chlorination plus additional treatment. Conversely, brominated THM concentrations were higher in systems using additional treatment. Residual chlorine was highest in the winter and lowest in the spring and summer. Seasonal variations were most pronounced for residual chlorine in systems with additional treatment. There was generally poor correlation between THM concentrations and concentrations of residual chlorine. Further study with these data will be beneficial in finding determinants and indicators for both quantity and variability of disinfection byproducts and other water quality parameters.

Keywords

drinking water residual chlorine seasonal variability small municipal systems treatment technologies trihalomethanes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Environment Canada. National Climate Data and Information Archive Canadian Climate Normal. 2012. Available online at http://www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html (accessed May 13, 2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kormos J L. Occurrence and Seasonal Variability of Selected Pharmaceuticals in Southern Ontario Drinking Water. Thesis for Master. Waterloo Ontario Canada: University of Waterloo, 2007Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Llopis-González A, Morales-Suárez-Varela M, Sagrado-Vives S, Gimeno-Clemente N, Yusà-Pelecha V, Martí-Requena P, Monforte-Monleán L. Long-term characterization of trihalomethane levels in drinking water. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 2010, 92(4): 683–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baytak D, Sofuoglu A, Inal F, Sofuoglu S C. Seasonal variation in drinking water concentrations of disinfection by-products in IZMIR and associated human health risks. The Science of the Total Environment, 2008, 407(1): 286–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Uyak V, Toroz I, Merric S. Monitoring and modelling of trihalomethanes (THMs) for a water treatment plant in Istanbul. Desalination, 2005, 176(1–3): 91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giannoulis N, Maipa V, Albanis T, Konstantinou I, Dimoliatis I. The quality of drinking water supplies in north-western Greece: A three year follow-up. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 2004, 84(1–3): 217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golfinopoulos S K, Xilourgidis N K, Kostopouou M, Lekkas T D. Use of a multiple regression model for predicting trihalomethanes formation. Water Research, 1998, 32(9): 2821–2829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fabris R, Chow C W K, Drikas M, Eikebrokk B. Comparison of NOM character in selected Australian and Norwegian drinking waters. Water Research, 2008, 42(15): 4188–4196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rodriguez M J, Sérodes J B, Levallois P, Proulx F. Chlorinated disinfection by-products in drinking water according to source, treatment, season and distribution location. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 2007, 6(4): 355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tesfamichael A A, Kaluarachchi J J. Uncertainty analysis of pesticide residues in drinking water risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2004, 10(6): 1129–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vecchia A V, Martin J D, Gilliom R J. Modeling variability and trends in pesticide concentrations in streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2008, 44(5): 1308–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    World Health Organization. Climate and Health Fact Sheet. 2005. Available online at http://www.who.int/globalchange/news/fsclimandhealth/en/index.html (accessed May 13, 2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moffatt H, Struck S. Water-borne disease outbreaks in Canadian small drinking water systems. Report for: National Collaborating Centres for Public Health. 2011. Available online at http://www.nccph.ca/docs/SDWS_Water-borne_EN.pdf (accessed May 13, 2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodriguez M J, Vinette Y, Sérodes J, Bouchard C. Trihalomethanes in drinking water of greater Québec Region (Canada): occurrence, variations and modelling. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2003, 89(1): 69–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rook J. Formation of haloforms during chlorination of natural waters. Water Treatment and Examination, 1974, 23(4): 234–243Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Villanueva C M, Kogevinas M, Cordier S, Templeton M R, Vermeulen R, Nuckols J R, Nieuwenhuijsen M J, Levallois P. Assessing exposure and health consequences of chemicals in drinking water: current state of knowledge and research needs. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2014, 122(3): 213–221Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    European Union (EU) Council. Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the Quality of Water Intended for Human Consumption. 1998. Available online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:01998L0083-20090807&rid=1 (accessed May 13, 2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Health Canada. Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality. 2012. Available online at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/water-eau/2012-sum_guideres_recom/index-eng.php (Accessed May 13, 2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. 2009. Available online at http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/upload/mcl-2.pdf (accessed May 13, 2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Espigares M, Lardelli P, Ortega P. Evaluating trihalomethane content in drinking water on the basis of common monitoring parameters regression models. Journal of Environmental Health, 2003, 66(3): 9–13Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adin A, Katzhender J, Alkaslassy D, Rav-Acha Ch. Trihalomethane formation in chlorinated drinking water: a kinetic model. Water Research, 1991, 25(7): 797–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gouvernement du Québec. Lignes Directrices Concernant l’Échantillonnage de l’eau potable. Ministère du développement durable, de l’environnement et des parcs. DR-12-SCA-07, 2012. Available online at http://www.ceaeq.gouv.qc.ca/accreditation/pala/DR12SCA07_lignes_dir_echant_eau_po.pdf (Accessed May 13, 2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Palisade Corporation. StatTools® for Excel Add-in for Microsoft Excel Version 5.5.1: Industrial Edition. 2010. Ithaca, NY USAGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Golfinopoulos S K. The occurrence of trihalomethanes in the drinking water in Greece. Chemosphere, 2000, 41(11): 1761–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen W J, Weisel C P. Halogenated DBP concentrations in a distribution system. Journal of the American Water Works Association, 1998, 90(4): 151–163Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Singer P C, Obolensky A, Greiner A. DBPs in chlorinated North Carolina drinking water. Journal of the American Water Works Association, 1995, 87(10): 83–92Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gouvernement du Québec Guide d’Interprétation du Règlement sur la qualité de l’eau potable. Ministère du développement durable, de l’environnement et des parcs. 2014. Available online at http://www.mddep.gouv.qc.ca/eau/potable/reglement/guide_interpretation_RQEP.pdf (Accessed May 13, 2014)
  28. 28.
    Cancho B, Ventura F, Galceran M T. Behavior of halogenated disinfection by-products in the water treatment plant of Barcelona, Spain. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1999, 63(5): 610–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberta Dyck
    • 1
  • Geneviève Cool
    • 2
  • Manuel Rodriguez
    • 2
  • Rehan Sadiq
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of British Columbia OkanaganKelownaCanada
  2. 2.École supérieure d’aménagement du territoireUniversité LavalQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations