Coupled aerobic and anoxic biodegradation for quinoline and nitrogen removals

  • Ning Yan
  • Lu Wang
  • Ling Chang
  • Cuiyi Zhang
  • Yang Zhou
  • Yongming Zhang
  • Bruce E. Rittmann
Research Article

Abstract

Quinoline (C9H7N) commonly occurs in wastewaters from the chemical, pharmaceutical, and dyeing industries. As quinoline is biodegraded, nitrogen is released as ammonium. Total-N removal requires that the ammonium-N be nitrified and then denitrified. The objective of this study was to couple quinoline biodegradation with total-N removal. In a proof-of-concept step, activated sludge was sequenced from aerobic to anoxic stages. The ammonium nitrogen released from quinoline biodegradation in the aerobic stage was nitrified to nitrate in parallel. Anoxic biodegradation of the aerobic effluent then brought about nitrogen and COD removals through denitrification. Then, simultaneous quinoline biodegradation and total-N removal were demonstrated in a novel airlift internal loop biofilm reactor (AILBR) having aerobic and anoxic zones. Experimental results showed that the AILBR could achieve complete removal of quinoline, 91% COD removal, and 85% total-N removal when glucose added as a supplemental electron donor once nitrate was formed.

Keywords

Quinoline biofilm reactor biodegradation denitrification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Li Y M, Gu G W, Zhao J F, Yu H Q, Qiu Y L, Peng Y Z. Treatment of coke-plant wastewater by biofilm systems for removal of organic compounds and nitrogen. Chemosphere, 2003, 52(6): 997–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brumley W C, Brownrigg C M, Brilis G M. Characterization of nitrogen containing aromatic compounds in soil and sediment by capillary gas chromatography-mass spectrometry after fractionation. Journal of Chromatography. A, 1991, 558(1): 223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fetzner S, Tshisuaka B, Lingens F, Kappl R, Hüttermann J. Bacterial degradation of quinoline and derivatives-pathways and their biocatalysts. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 1998, 37(5): 576–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nagao M, Yahagi T, Seino Y, Sugimura T, Ito N. Mutagenicities of quinoline and its derivatives. Mutation Research, 1977, 42(3): 335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    LaVoie E J, Shigematsu A, Adams E A, Rigotty J, Hoffmann D. Tumor-initiating activity of quinoline and methylated quinolines on the skin of SENCAR mice. Cancer Letters, 1984, 22(3): 269–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirao K, Shinohara Y, Tsuda H, Fukushima S, Takahashi M. Carcinogenic activity of quinoline on rat liver. Cancer Research, 1976, 36(2 Pt 1): 329–335Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neuwoehner J, Reineke A K, Hollender J, Eisentraeger A. Ecotoxicity of quinoline and hydroxylated derivatives and their occurrence in groundwater of a tar-contaminated field site. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2009, 72(3): 819–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sideropoulos A S, Secht S M. Evaluation of microbial testing methods for the mutagenicity of quinoiline and its derivatives. Current Microbiology, 1984, 11: 59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas J K, Gunda K, Rehbein P, Ng F T T. Flow calorimetry and adsorption study of dibenzothiophene, quinoline and naphthalene over modifieed Y zeolites. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2010, 94(3–4): 225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nedoloujko A, Kiwi J. Transient intermediate species active during the Fenton-mediated degradation of quinoline in oxidative media: pulsed laser spectroscopy. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry, 1997, 110(2): 141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    An T, Zhang W, Xiao X, Sheng G, Fu J, Zhu X. Photoelectrocatalytic degradation of quinoline with a novel three-dimensional electrode-packed bed photocatalytic reactor. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry, 2004, 161(2–3): 233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomsen A B. Degradation of quinoline by wet oxidation—kinetic aspects and reaction mechanisms. Water Research, 1998, 32(1): 136–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang X M, Huang X, Zuo C Y, Hu H Y. Kinetics of quinoline degradation by O3/UV in aqueous phase. Chemosphere, 2004, 55(5): 733–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ogunsola O M. Decomposition of isoquinoline and quinoline by supercritical water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2000, 74(3): 187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang J, Quan X, Han L, Qian Y, Hegemann W. Kinetics of cometabolism of quinoline and glucose by Burkholderia pickettii. Process Biochemistry, 2002, 37(8): 831–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang Y, Han L, Wang J, Yu J, Shi H, Qian Y. An internal airlift loop bioreactor with Burkholderia pickettii immobilized onto ceramic honeycomb support for degradation of quinoline. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2002, 11(2–3): 149–157Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sun Q H, Bai Y H, Zhao C, Xiao Y N, Wen D H, Tang X Y. Aerobic biodegradation characteristics and metabolic products of quinoline by a Pseudomonas strain. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(21): 5030–5036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin Q, Jianlong W. Biodegradation characteristics of quinoline by Pseudomonas putida. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(19): 7683–7686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang J, Han L, Shi H, Qian Y. Biodegradation of quinoline by gel immobilized Burkholderia sp. Chemosphere, 2001, 44(5): 1041–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhu S N, Liu D Q, Fan L, Ni J R. Degradation of quinoline by Rhodococcus sp. QL2 isolated from activated sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 160(2–3): 289–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang J, Quan X, Han L, Qian Y, Hegemann W. Microbial degradation of quinoline by immobilized cells of Burkholderia pickettii. Water Research, 2002, 36(9): 2288–2296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang C, Liu G, Zhang R, Luo H. Electricity Production from and Biodegradation from Quinoline using Microbial Fuel Cells. Journal of Environmental Science Health. 2010, 45(2): 250–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bai Y, Sun Q, Zhao C, Wen D, Tang X. Quinoline biodegradation and its nitrogen transformation pathway by a Pseudomonas sp. strain. Biodegradation, 2010, 21(3): 335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu S M, Jones WJ, Rogers J E. Biotransformation of quinoline and methylquinolines in anoxic freshwater sediment. Biodegradation, 1994, 5(2): 113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Johansen S S, Licht D, Arvin E, Mosbæk H, Hansen A B. Metabolic pathways of quinoline, indole and their methylated analogs by Desulfobacterium indolicum (DSM 3383). Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1997, 47(3): 292–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li Y, Gu G, Zhao J, Yu H. Anoxic degradation of nitrogenous heterocyclic compounds by acclimated activated sludge. Process Biochemistry, 2001, 37(1): 81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paerl H W, Xu H, McCarthy M J, Zhu G W, Qin B Q, Li Y P, Gardner W S. Controlling harmful cyanobacterial blooms in a hyper-eutrophic lake (Lake Taihu, China): the need for a dual nutrient (N & P) management strategy.Water Research, 2011, 45(5): 1973–1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meile C, Porubsky W P, Walker R L, Payne K. Natural attenuation of nitrogen loading from septic effluents: Spatial and environmental controls. Water Research, 2010, 44(5): 1399–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang C, Wang L, Yan N, Zhang Y, Liu R. Air-lift internal loop biofilm reactor for realized simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2013, 36(5): 597–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li Y Z, He Y L, Ohandja D G, Ji J, Li J F, Zhou T. Simultaneous nitrification-denitrification achieved by an innovative internal-loop airlift MBR: comparative study. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(13): 5867–5872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wei F. Monitoring and analytic methods of water and wastewater. 4th ed. Beijing: Environmental Science Press of China, 2002 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd ed. American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington DC, USA, 2001Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pribyl M, Tucek F, Wilderer P A, Wanner J. Amount and nature of soluble refractory organics produced by activated sludge microorganisms in sequencing batch and continuous flow reactors. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 35(1): 27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yan N, Chang L, Gan L, Zhang Y, Liu R, Rittmann B E. UV photolysis for accelerated quinoline biodegradation and mineralization. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 97(24): 10555–10561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rittmann B E, McCarty P L. Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Application. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ning Yan
    • 1
  • Lu Wang
    • 1
  • Ling Chang
    • 1
  • Cuiyi Zhang
    • 1
  • Yang Zhou
    • 1
  • Yongming Zhang
    • 1
  • Bruce E. Rittmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Life and Environmental ScienceShanghai Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Biodesign InstituteArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations