Advertisement

On water security, sustainability, and the water-food-energy-climate nexus

  • Michael Bruce Beck
  • Rodrigo Villarroel Walker
Review Article

Abstract

The role of water security in sustainable development and in the nexus of water, food, energy and climate interactions is examined from the starting point of the definition of water security offered by Grey and Sadoff. Much about the notion of security has to do with the presumption of scarcity in the resources required to meet human needs. The treatment of scarcity in mainstream economics is in turn examined, therefore, in relation to how each of us as individuals reconciles means with ends, a procedure at the core of the idea of sustainable development. According to the Grey-Sadoff definition, attaining water security amounts to achieving basic, single-sector water development as a precursor of more general, self-sustaining, multi-sectoral development. This is consistent with the way in which water is treated as “first among equals”, i.e. privileged, in thinking about what is key in achieving security around the nexus of water, food, energy and climate. Cities, of course, are locations where demands for these multiple resource-energy flows are increasingly being generated. The paper discusses two important facets of security, i.e., diversity of access to resources and services (such as sanitation) and resilience in the behavior of coupled human-built-natural systems. Eight quasi-operational principles, by which to gauge nexus security with respect to city buildings and infrastructure, are developed.

Keywords

cities as forces for good diversity energy and nutrient recovery green economy infrastructure failure resilience 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beck M B. Cities as Forces for Good in the Environment: Sustainability in the Water Sector. Athens, Georgia: Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 2011 (online as http://cfgnet.org/archives/587)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cook C, Bakker K. Water security: debating an emerging paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2012, 22(1): 94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liao K H. A theory on urban resilience to floods: a basis for alternative planning practices. Ecology and Society, 2012, 17(4): 48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    WCED. Our Common Future. Oxford: World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, 1987Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grey D, Sadoff C W. Sink or swim? Water security for growth and development. Water Policy, 2007, 9(6): 545–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elkington J. Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Stony Creek, Connecticut: New Society Publishers, 1998Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    WEF. Water Security: the Water-Food-Energy-Climate Nexus. World Economic Forum (WEF) Water Initiative. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2011Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beck M B, Villarroel Walker R. Global water crisis: a joined-up view from the city. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating ENvironment & Society, SAPIENS [Online], 2011, 4(1). Available online at http://sapiens.revues.org/1187 (accessed December 27, 2011)
  9. 9.
    Hoff H. Understanding the Nexus. Background Paper for the Bonn2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute, 2011Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4(1): 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holling C S. Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze P, ed. Engineering within Ecological Constraints. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996, 31–44Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beck M B, Villarroel Walker R. Nexus security: Governance, innovation, and the resilient city. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2013, 7(5): 640–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leopold A. A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1949Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fine B. Economics and scarcity: With Amartya Sen as a point of departure? In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, 73–91Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Samuel S, Robert J. Water can and ought to run freely: Reflections on the notion of ‘scarcity’ in economics. In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, 109–126Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thompson M. A bit of the other: Why scarcity isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, 127–142Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rayner S. Preface. In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, xvii–xxGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mehta L. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mehta L. Introduction. In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, 1–8Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stiglitz J. Economics of the Public Sector. 3rd ed. New York: Norton & Company, 2000Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meadows D H, Meadows D L, Randers J, Behrens WW. The Limits to Growth: a Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books, 1972Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A. Cultural Theory. Boulder, Colorado: West View, 1990Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thompson M. Sustainability is an essentially contested concept. Surveys And Perspectives Integrating ENvironment & Society, SAPIENS [Online], 2011, 4(1). Available online at http://sapiens.revues.org/1177 (accessed November 23, 2011)
  24. 24.
    Thompson M. Material flows and moral positions. Insight. 2011. Cities as Forces for Good (CFG) Network, available online at http://cfgnet.org/archives/531 (accessed May 6, 2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gyawali D, Dixit A. The construction and destruction of scarcity in development: Water and power experiences in Nepal. In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, 233–251Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beck M B, Thompson M, Ney S, Gyawali D, Jeffrey P. On governance for re-engineering city infrastructure. Proceedings of the ICE — Engineering Sustainability, 2011, 164(2): 129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ney S. Resolving Messy Policy Problems: Handling Conflict in Environmental, Transport, Health and Ageing Policy. London: Earthscan, 2009Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    GWP. Towards Water Security: a Framework for Action. Stockholm: Global Water Partnership, 2000Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rijsberman F R. Water scarcity: Fact or fiction? Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 80(1–3): 5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maslow A H. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 1943, 50(4): 370–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Douglas M, Gasper D, Ney S, Thompson M. Human needs and wants. In: Rayner S, Malone E L, eds. Human Choice and Climate Change, vol 1. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle, 1998, 195–264Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kwame D S. Domestication of excreta: a cultural theory analysis of ecosan dry toilet schemes in peri-urban Accra, Ghana. Thesis for the Master Degree. Ås, Norway: Environment and Development Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 2007Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gyawali D. Water, sanitation and human settlements: crisis, opportunity or management? Water Nepal, 2004, 11(2): 7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Whittington D, Sadoff C W, Allaire M. The economic value of moving toward a more water secure world. TEC Background Paper No 18. Stockholm: Technical Committee (TEC), Global Water Partnership, 2013Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fishman C. The Big Thirst: the Secret Life and Turbulent Future of Water. New York: Free Press, 2011Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pearce F. When the Rivers Run Dry: The Defining Crisis of the Twenty-First Century. Boston: Beacon, 2006Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Specter M. The last drop. New Yorker (New York, N.Y.), 2006, Available online at http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/10/23/061023fa_fact1 (accessed May 6, 2013)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Erisman J W, Larsen T A. Nitrogen economy of the 21st century. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management. London: IWA Publishing, 2013, 45–58Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Erisman J W, Sutton M A, Galloway J, Klimont Z, Winiwarter W. How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nature Geoscience, 2008, 1(10): 636–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cordell D. Peak phosphorus and the role of P recovery in achieving food security. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management. London: IWA Publishing, 2013, 22–44Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Elser J, Bennett E. Phosphorus cycle: a broken biogeochemical cycle. Nature, 2011, 478(7367): 29–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brown L R. The new geopolitics of food. Foreign Policy (May/June). 2011. Available online at http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/04/25/the_new_geopolitics_of_food (accessed February 6, 2013)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    SIWI-IWMI. Water-More Nutrition Per Drop: Towards Sustainable Food Production and Consumption Patterns in a Rapidly Changing World. Policy Paper. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI) and International Water Management Institute (IWMI), 2004Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dobbs R, Smit S, Remes J, Manyika J, Roxburgh C, Restrepo A. Urban world: mapping the economic power of cities. Report, McKinsey Global Institute. 2011. Available online at http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/mgi/research/urbanization/urban_world (accessed February 6, 2013)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Glaeser E. Triumph of the City. How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier. New York: Penguin, 2011Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Barles S. Feeding the city: food consumption and flow of nitrogen, Paris, 1801-1914. Science of the Total Environment, 2007, 375(1–3): 48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Barles S. Urban metabolism and river systems: an historical perspective — Paris and the Seine, 1790–1970. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2007, 4(3): 1845–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Barles S. Society, energy and materials: the contribution of urban metabolism studies to sustainable urban development issues. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2010, 53(4): 439–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wolman A. The metabolism of cities. Scientific American, 1965, 213(3): 179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Villarroel Walker R, Beck M B. Understanding the metabolism of urban-rural ecosystems: a multi-sectoral systems analysis. Urban Ecosystems, 2012, 15(4): 809–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Villarroel Walker R, Beck M B, Hall JW. Water—and nutrient and energy — systems in urbanizing watersheds. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2012, 6(5): 596–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Beck M B, Jiang F, Shi F, Villarroel Walker R, Osidele O O, Lin Z, Demir I, Hall J W. Re-engineering cities as forces for good in the environment. Proceedings of the ICE-Engineering Sustainability, 2010, 163(1): 31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Purnell P, Dawson D, Roelich K, Steinberger J, Busch J. Critical materials for low-carbon infrastructure: The analysis of local vs global properties. In: Dawson R J, Walsh C L, Kilsby C G, eds. Earth Systems Engineering 2012: a Technical Symposium on Systems Engineering for Sustainable Adaptation to Global Change. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Centre for Earth Systems Engineering Research, Newcastle University, 2012, 127–140Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Villarroel Walker R. Sustainability beyond eco-efficiency: a multisectoral systems analysis of water, nutrients, and energy. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia, 2010Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    McDonough W, Braungart M. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press, 2002Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Moddemeyer S. Understanding the nature of change: Building resilience into urban life. Water21, 2012, August: 14–18Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Peterson G, Allen C R, Holling C S. Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems (New York, N.Y.), 1998, 1(1): 6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Thompson M. Man and nature as a single but complex system. In: Timmerman P, ed. Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, vol 5. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2002, 384–393Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Bruce Beck
    • 1
  • Rodrigo Villarroel Walker
    • 1
  1. 1.Warnell School of Forestry and Natural ResourcesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations