Improved nitrogen removal in dual-contaminated surface water by photocatalysis
- 83 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
River waters in China have dual contamination by nutrients and recalcitrant organic compounds. In principle, the organic compounds could be used to drive denitrification of nitrate, thus arresting eutrophication potential, if the recalcitrant organics could be made bioavailable. This study investigated the potential to make the recalcitrant organics bioavailable through photocatalysis. Batch denitrification tests in a biofilm reactor demonstrated that dual-contaminated river water was short of available electron donor, which resulted in low total nitrogen (TN) removal by denitrification. However, the denitrification rate was increased significantly by adding glucose or by making the organic matters of the river water more bioavailable through photocatalysis. Photocatalysis for 15 min increased the Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) of the river water from 53 to 84 mg·L−1 and led to a 4-fold increase in TN removal. The increase in TN removal gave the same effect as adding 92 mg·L−1 of glucose. During the photocatalysis experiments, the COD increased because photocatalysis transformed organic molecules from those that are resistant to dichromate oxidation in the COD test to those that can be oxidized by dichromate. This phenomenon was verified by testing photocatalysis of pyridine added to the river water. These findings point to the potential for N removal via denitrification after photocatalysis, and they also suggest that the rivers in China may be far more polluted than indicated by COD assays.
Keywords
dual contamination eutrophication photocatalysis remediation surface waterPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Pei H P, Wang Y. Eutrophication research ofWest Lake, Hangzhou, China: modeling under uncertainty. Water Research, 2003, 37(2): 416–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Hu X L. Summing up the research on eutrophication mechanisms of lakes and reservoirs. Water Resources Protection, 2009, 25(4): 44–47 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 3.Zhou J B, Zhang Z Y. Production Origin and Control Countermeasures of Water Eutrophication in China. Journal of Anhui Agriculture Science, 2009, 37(21): 10126–10128 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 4.Hu G J, Sun C, Li J, Zhao Y G, Wang H, Li Y Q. POPs accumulated in fish and benthos bodies taken from Yangtze River in Jiangsu area. Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2009, 18(6): 647–651Google Scholar
- 5.Shi W, Wang X Y, Hu W, Sun H, Shen O X, Liu H L, Wang X R, Giesy J P, Cheng S P, Yu H X. Endocrine-disrupting equivalents in industrial effluents discharged into Yangtze River. Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2009, 18(6): 685–692Google Scholar
- 6.Blocksom K A, Walters D M, Jicha T M, Lazorchak J M, Angradi T R, Bolgrien D W. Persistent organic pollutants in fish tissue in the mid-continental great rivers of the United States. The Science of the total environment, 2010, 408(5): 1180–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Qu J H. Dual-contaminated water control. Impact of Science on Society, 2000, 20(1): 35–39 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 8.Zhu Y M, Li J S, Yang A L, Wang N. Study on non-point source pollution of surface drinking water. Source of Cities. Urban Environment and Ecology, 2000, 13(4): 1–4 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 9.Wang S. Shanghai landscape water research and analysis. China Water Resources, 2004, 55(11): 40–42 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 10.Wittmer I K, Bader H P, Scheidegger R, Singer H, Lück A, Hanke I, Carlsson C, Stamm C. Significance of urban and agricultural land use for biocide and pesticide dynamics in surface waters. Water Research, 2010, 44(9): 2850–2862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Mulder A, Graaf A A, Robertson I A, Kuenen J G. Anaerobic ammonium oxidation discovered in a denitrifying fluidized bed reactor. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 1995, 16(3): 177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.dos Santos V A P M, Bruijnse M, Tramper J, Wijffels R H. The magic-bead concept: an integrated approach to nitrogen removal with co-immobilized micro-organisms. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1996, 45(4): 447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kuai L, Verstraete W. Ammonium removal by the oxygen-limited autotrophic nitrification-denitrification system. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1998, 64(11): 4500–4506Google Scholar
- 14.Third K A, Sliekers A O, Kuenen J G, Jetten M S M. The CANON system (completely autotrophic nitrogen-removal over nitrite) under ammonium limitation: interaction and competition between three groups of bacteria. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 2001, 24 (4): 588–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Rittmann B E. Biofilms in the Water Industry. In: Ghannoum M A, O’Toole G A, eds. Microbial Biofilms. Washington DC: ASM Press, 2004, 359–378Google Scholar
- 16.Sengupta S, Ergas S J, Lopez-Luna E, Sahu A K, Palaniswamy K. Autotrophic biological denitrification for complete removal of nitrogen from septic system wastewater. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2006, 6(1–2): 111–126Google Scholar
- 17.Zhang D M, Yang H F. Progress in microbial nitrogen removal. Microbiology Bulletin, 1998, 25(6): 348–350 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 18.Zhao D, Ren N Q, Ma F, Shen Y L, Li Y. Microbiology and research progress in biological nitrogen removal. Journal of Harbin University of C.E.&. Architecture, 2002, 35(5): 60–65 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 19.Kong Q X, Li J W. Review of research in aerobic denitrification by microorganisms. Journal of Environmental Health, 2004, 21(3): 189–191 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 20.Yan Z Y, Liao Y Z, Li X D, Liu X F, Yuan Y X, Song L. Progress in Research of Biological Removal of Nitrogen. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2006, 12(2): 292–296 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 21.Rittmann B E, McCarty P L. Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Application. Columbus: McGraw Hill publishing Company, 2001Google Scholar
- 22.Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, Matsuo T, Wentzel M C, Marais G. Wastewater and biomass characterization for the activated sludge model No. 2: biological phosphorus removal. Water Science and Technology, 1995, 31(2): 13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Carucci A, Kuhni M B, Brun R, Carucci G, Koch G, Majone M, Siegrist H. Microbical competition for the organic substrates and its impact on EBPR systems under conditions of changing carbon feed. Water Science and Technology, 1999, 39(1): 75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Scott J P, Ollis D F. Integration of chemical and biological oxidation processes for water treatment: review and recommendations. Environment and Progress, 1995, 14(2): 88–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Agrios A G, Gray K A, Weitz E K. Narrow-band irradiation of a homologous series of chlorophenols on TiO2: charge-transfer complex formation and reactivity. Langmuir, 2004, 20(14): 5911–5917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Enriquez R, Beaugiraud B, Pichat P. Mechanistic implications of the effect of TiO2 accessibility in TiO2-SiO2 coatings upon chlorinated organics photocatalytic removal in water. Water Sci Technol, 2004, 49(4): 147–152Google Scholar
- 27.Han W Y, Zhu W P, Zhang P Y, Zhang Y, Li L S. Photocatalytic degradation of phenols in aqueous solution under irradiation of 254 and 185 nm UV light. Catalysis Today, 2004, 90(3–4): 319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Sakthivel S, Neppoiian B, Palanichamy M, Arabindoo B, Murugesan V. Photocatalytic degradation of leather dye over ZnO catalyst supported on alumina and glass surfaces. Water Sci Technol, 2001, 44(5): 211–218Google Scholar
- 29.Stafford U, Gray K A, Kamat P V. Radiolytic and TiO2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol — comparative-study. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1994, 98(25): 6343–6351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Fujishima A, Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature, 1972, 238(5358): 37–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Marsolek M D, Torres C I, Hausner M, Rittmann B E. Intimate coupling of photocatalysis and biodegradation in a photocatalytic circulating-bed biofilm reactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2008, 101(1): 83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Zhang Y, Wang L, Rittmann B E. Integrated photocatalyticbiological reactor for accelerated phenol mineralization. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2010, 86(6): 1977–1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Zhang Y, Liu H, Shi W, Pu X, Zhang H S, Rittmann B E. Photobiodegradation of phenol with ultraviolet irradiation of new ceramic biofilm carriers. Biodegradation, 2010, 21(6): 881–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Zou Z, Zhang Y. Change law of urban river water with complexpollution under photocatalytic oxidation. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2009, 38(2): 197–202Google Scholar
- 35.American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington DC: American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation, 2001Google Scholar
- 36.Wei F. Monitoring and Analytic Methods of Water and Wastewater. 4th ed. Beijing: Environmental Science Press of China, 2002 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 37.Moore W A, Kroner R C, Ruchhoft C C. Dichromate reflux method for determination of oxygen demand. Analytical Chemistry, 1949, 21(8): 953–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Chudoba J, Dalešický J. Chemical oxygen demand of some nitrogenous heterocyclic compounds. Water Research, 1973, 7(5): 663–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Mallak M, Bockmeyer M, Löbmann P. Liquid phase deposition of TiO2 on glass: Systematic comparison to films prepared by sol-gel processing. Thin Solid Films, 2007, 515(20–21): 8072–8077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Zhang Z. Drainage Engineering (the second volume). 4th ed. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 1999 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 41.Environmental Protection Administration of China (EPAC). Surface Water Quality Standards (GB 3838-2002). Beijing: The People’s Republic of China National Standard, 2002 (in Chinese)Google Scholar