Restoration of hyper-eutrophic water with a modularized and air adjustable constructed submerged plant bed

  • Jinzhong Li
  • Xueju Li
  • Shujuan Sun
  • Xuegong Liu
  • Suiliang Huang
Research Article

Abstract

A modularized and air adjustable constructed submerged plant bed (CSPB) which can be used to restore the eutrophic water is introduced in this paper. This plant bed helps hydrophyte grow under poor conditions such as frequently changed water depth, impaired water transparency, algae bloom and substantial duckweed in summer, which are not naturally suitable for growing hydrophyte. This pilot study in Waihuan River of Tianjin, China, revealed that reduction of Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorus (TP) by the use of CSPB could be reached 30%–35%, 35%–40%, 30%–40% respectively in the growing season (from March to October) and 5%–10%, 5%–15%, 7%–20% respectively in the winter (from November to February) when the detention time was 6 d. The relationships between the concentration of COD, TN, TP and the detention time fit the first-order kinetic equation well and the coefficients of determination (R2) were all above 0.9. The attenuation coefficients k of the kinetic equation were a function of the water temperature. When the water temperature was quite low or quite high, k was not significantly changed with increasing or decreasing water temperature. While when the temperature was in a moderate range, an increase or decrease of water temperature would lead to a rapid increase or decrease in k.

Keywords

modularized and air adjustable constructed submerged plant bed water purification eco-restoration techniques aquatic plants eutrophication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tanner C C. Plants for constructed wetland systems-a comparison of the growth and nutrient uptake of eight emergent species. Ecological Engineering, 1996, 7(1): 59–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hughes J B, Shanks J, Vanderford M, Lauritzen J, Bhadra R. Transformation of TNT by aquatic plants and plant tissue cultures. Environmental Science & Technology, 1997, 31(1): 266–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ingersolla T L, Bakera L A. Nitrate removal in wetland microcosms. Water Research, 1998, 32(3): 677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Groudeva V I, Groudev S N, Doycheva A S. Bioremediation of waters contaminated with crude oil and toxic heavy metal. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2001, 62(1–4): 293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bankston J L, Sola D L, Komor A T, Dwyer D F. Degradation of trichloroethylene in wetland microcosms containing broad-leaved cattail and eastern cottonwood. Water Research, 2002, 36(6): 539–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dierberg F E, de Busk T A, Jackson S D, Chimney M J, Pietro K. Submerged aquatic vegetation-based treatment wetlands for removing phosphorus from agricultural runoff: response to hydraulic and nutrient loading. Water Research, 2002, 36(6): 1409–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li J Z, Li X J. The development of study on water quality improvement by using constructed submerged plant bed. Journal of agro-environment science, 2006, 25(suppl.): 825–830 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang X B, Liu P, Yang Y S, Chen W R. Phytoremediation of urban wastewater by model wetlands with ornamental hydrophytes. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2007, 19(8): 902–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kubin P, Melzer A. Chronological relationship between eutrophiction and reed decline in three lakes of southern Germany. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica, 1997, 32(1): 15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shang S Y, Du J M, Li X Y, Shen Q T, Hou F X, Wu L B. Experimental study on improving ecological conditions through harvesting submerged plants in a vegetation rich lake. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2003, 19(6): 95–100 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu Z B, Qiu D R, He F, Fu G P, Cheng S P, Ma J M. Effects of rehabilitation of submerged macrophytes on nutrient level of a eutrophic lake. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 14(8): 1351–1353 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yue W Z, Huang X P, Huang L M, Tan Y H, Yin J Q. Preliminary study on purification of mariculture water by macroscopic algae. Marine Environmental Science, 2004, 23(1): 13–15 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xu D L, Liu Z W, Zeng Y, Wang H J. Effect of phragmites communities on the sediment of Taihu Lake. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2005, 34(2): 148–151 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brix H. Functions of macrophytes in constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology, 1994, 29(4): 71–78Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pempkowiak H O, Ozimek T, Haustein E. The removal of biogenic compounds and suspended solids in a constructed wetland system. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2002, 11(3): 261–266Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tong C H, Yang X E, Pu P M. Effects and mechanism of hydrophytes on control of release of nutrient salts in lake sediment. Journal of Agro-environment Science, 2003, 22(6): 673–676 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Faisal M, Hasnain S. Beneficial role of hydrophytes in removing Cr(VI) from wastewater in association with chromate-reducing bacterial strains Ochrobactrum intermedium and Brevibacterium. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 2005, 7(4): 271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wan X H, Li X D, Wang Y C, Lu J, Zhao Y Y, Liu L H, Zhou H D. Simulation of removal ammonia and nitrate from wetlands constructed by different hydrophytes. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2008, 20(3): 327–333 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shaltout K H, Galal T M, Komi T M E. Evaluation of the nutrient status of some hydrophytes in the water courses of Nile Delta, Egypt. Journal of Botany, 2009, 20(1): 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhu M, Sun J J, Xu Y T. Water purification and ecotype maintenance in landscape water-body. Shanghai Environmental Sciences, 2003, 22(suppl.): 159–164 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chong Y X, Hu H Y, Qian Y. Advances in utilization of macrophytes in water pollution control. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control, 2003, 4(2): 36–40 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dong X D, Zhou Q, Zhou X D. Technology and development of pollution prevention and treatment on rivers and lakes in China. Geology and Resource, 2004, 13(1): 26–29 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhu W, Chen Q J, Zhang L F. Purification effect of polluted water in low temperature in winter by Elodea nuttallii. Ecology & Environment, 2004, 13(4): 497–499 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ma J Q, Zhou H D, Dong Z R. Study on aquatic macrophytes for purification of eutrophic water. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2005, 3(2): 130–135 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stoltz E, Greger M. Accumulation properties of As, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn by four wetland plant species growing on submerged mine tailings. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2002, 47(3): 271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Demirezen D, Aksoy A. Accumulation of heavy metals in Typha angustifolia (L.) and Potamogeton pectinatus (L.) living in Sultan Marsh (Kayseri, Turkey). Chemosphere, 2004, 56(7): 685–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miretzky P, Saralegui A, Cirelli A F. Aquatic macrophytes potential for the simultaneous removal of heavy metals (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Chemosphere, 2004, 57(8): 997–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Keskinkan O, Goksu M Z, Basibuyuk M, Forster C F. Heavy metal adsorption properties of a submerged aquatic plant (Ceratophyllum demersum). Bioresource Technology, 2004, 92(2): 197–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Keskinkana O, Goksu M Z L, Yuceer A, Basibuyuk M. Comparison of the adsorption capabilities of myriophylum spicatum and ceratophyllum demersum for zinc, copper and lead. Engineering in Life Sciences, 2007, 7(2): 192–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maleva M G, Nekrasova G F, Bezel V S. The response of hydrophytes to environmental pollution with heavy metals. Russian Journal of Ecology, 2007, 35(4): 230–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cheng S P, Grossea W, Karrenbrock F. Thoennessenc M. Efficiency of constructed wetlands in decontamination of water polluted by heavy metals. Ecological Engineering, 2001, 18(3): 317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xian QM, Chen H D, Zou H X, Yi D Q. Analysis of organic acids in aqueous leachates of three submerged macrophytes. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2004, 13(3): 57–58 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yang C S, Lan C Y, Shu W S. Study on the Efficiency of broadleaved cattail constructed wetlands to treat waste water from plumbum, zinc mine. Journal of Shenzhen University, 2000, 17(2): 51–57 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xian Q M, Chen H D, Zou H X, Yi D Q, Gong H J, Qu L J. Allelopathic effects of four submerged macrophytes on microcystis aeruginosa. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2005, 17(1): 75–80 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dai S G, Zhao F, Jin Z H, Zhuang Y Y, Yuan Y C. Algae-restraint Efficiency of compound extracted from bulrush and the method of extracting and identify. Journal of Environmental Chemistry, 1997, 16(3): 268–271 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    He C Q, Ye J X. Study on algae-restraint Efficiency of calamus. Journal of Ecology, 1999, 19(5): 754–758 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cui X H, Xiong B H, Pu Y H, Li W, Chen J K, He G Q. Comparative Study of regeneration and colonization ability in five submersed macrophytes. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2000, 24(4): 502–505 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Niu X Y, Ge Y, Wang X Y, Xu Q S, Chang J. Comparison on difference of the purification ability to eutrophic water between five plants in different sunlight conditions. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2001, 17(2): 1–4 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Baldantoni D, Alfani A, Di Tommasi P, Bartoli G, De Santo A V. Assessment of macro and microelement accumulation capability of two aquatic plants. Environmental Pollution, 2004, 130(2): 149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Huang L, Zhai J P, Nie R, Wang C Y, Jiang X Y. Experimental study of decontamination and resistance ability of five hydrophytes. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2005, 18(3): 33–38 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Li Z Y, Tang Y L, Yang Z J, Yue C L. Current situation of study on plants on constructed wetland. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2004, 24(7): 56–59 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Huang L, Zhai J P, Wang C Y, Nie R, Yuan D H. Removals of nitrogen and phosphorus in Taihu Lake water by four hydrophytes in winter season. Journal of Agro-environment Science, 2005, 24(2): 366–370 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sorrell B K, Armstrong W. On the difficulties of measuring oxygen release by root systems of wetland plants. Journal of Ecology, 1994, 82(1): 177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Deng F T, Sun P S, Li Q, Wu G, Deng F S. Study on decontaminating sewage and utilizing of wetland plants. Ecological Economics, 2005, 4: 66–69 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang G X, Pu P M, Zhang S Z, Hu C H, Hu W P. The purification ability of aquatic macrophytes for eutrophic lake in winter. China Environmental Science, 1999, 19(2): 106–109 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cheng X Y, Wang G X, Pu P M, Zhang S Z, Chen B J. Restoration and purification of macrophytes in a eutrophic lake during autumn and winter. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2002, 14(2): 139–144 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zhu L, Miao W H, Yan Y. Comments on biologic-ecological rehabilitation techniques for rivers and lakes. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences Version), 2005, 23(1): 59–62 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Li W C, Lian G H. Light demands for brood-bud germination of submerged plant. Journal of Lake Sciences, 1996, 8(Suppl.): 25–29 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cheng N N, Zhu W, Zhang J. Reproduction and plantation technique of submerged macrophyte in polluted water. Water Resources Protection, 2004, 20(6): 8–12 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Xie T, Zhu F S, Guan Y. Tentative experimental results of raising grass in box with net to purify the water quality. Yunnan Environmental Sciences, 2004, 23(3): 58–62 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinzhong Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xueju Li
    • 2
  • Shujuan Sun
    • 3
  • Xuegong Liu
    • 2
  • Suiliang Huang
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria of Ministry of Education, Numerical Simulation Group for Water Environment, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Science and EngineeringNankai UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.Tianjin institution of water SciencesTianjinChina
  3. 3.College of Resources and EnvironmentShandong Agricultural UniversityTaianChina

Personalised recommendations