Kinetics of microwave-enhanced oxidation of phenol by hydrogen peroxide

Research Article

Abstract

Aqueous solutions of phenol were oxidized by hydrogen peroxide assisted by microwave (MW) irradiation. A simple kinetic model for the overall degradation of phenol in the presence of excess H2O2 is proposed in which the degradation rate of phenol is expressed as a linear function of the concentrations of phenol and H2O2. A detailed parametric study showed that the degradation rate of phenol increased with increasing [H2O2] until saturation was observed. Phenol degradation followed apparent zero-order kinetics under MW radiation or H2O2 oxidation. However, after 90 min of irradiation, the observed kinetics shifted to pseudo first order. The overall reaction rates were significantly enhanced in the combined MW/H2O2 system, mainly because microwave could accelerate H2O2 to generate hydroxyl radical (·OH) and other reactive oxygen intermediates. The observed synergetic effects of the MW/H2O2 process resulted in an increased in the net reaction rate by a factor of 5.75. When hydrogen peroxide is present in a large stoichiometric excess, the time required to achieve complete mineralization is reduced significantly.

Keywords

microwave (MW) irradiation hydrogen peroxide phenol synergetic effects kinetic model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wu Z L, Ondruschka B, Cravotto G. Degradation of phenol under combined irradiation of microwaves and ultrasound. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(21): 8083–8087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stöffler B, Luft G. Oxidative degradation of p-toluenesulfonic acid using hydrogen peroxide. Chemosphere, 1999, 38(5): 1035–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zazo J A, Casas J A, Molina C B, Quintanilla A, Rodriguez J J. Evolution of ecotoxicity upon Fenton’s oxidation of phenol in water. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(20): 7164–7170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zazo J A, Casas J A, Mohedano A F, Gilarranz M A, Rodríguez J J. Chemical pathway and kinetics of phenol oxidation by Fenton’s reagent. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(23): 9295–9302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao D M, Shi H X, Lei L C, Wang D H. Degradation of phenol in aqueous solution by US/H2O2 combination process. Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao, Gongxueban, 2004, 38(2): 240–243 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Han D H, Cha S Y, Yang H Y. Improvement of oxidative decomposition of aqueous phenol by microwave irradiation in UV/H2O2 process and kinetic study. Water Research, 2004, 38(11): 2782–2790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edalatmanesh M, Dhib R, Mehrvar M. Kinetic modeling of aqueous phenol degradation by UV/H2O2 process. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2008, 40(1): 34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosenfeldt E J, Linden K G, Canonica S, von Gunten U. Comparison of the efficiency of *OH radical formation during ozonation and the advanced oxidation processes O3/H2O2 and UV/H2O2. Water Research, 2006, 40(20): 3695–3704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gogate P R, Pandit A B. A review of imperative technologies for wastewater treatment I: Oxidation technologies at ambient conditions. Advances in Environmental Research, 2004, 8(3–4): 501–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glaze W H, Kang J W, Chapin D H. The chemistry of water treatment processes involving ozone. Ozone Science and Engineering, 1987, 9(4): 335–352Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lesko T, Colussi A J, Hoffmann MR. Sonochemical decomposition of phenol: evidence for a synergistic effect of ozone and ultrasound for the elimination of total organic carbon from water. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(21): 6818–6823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weavers L K, Malmstadt N, Hoffmann M R. Kinetics and mechanism of pentachlorophenol degradation by sonication, ozonation, and sonolytic ozonation. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000, 34(7): 1280–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Destaillats H, Hung H M, Hoffmann M R. Degradation of alkylphenol ethoxylate surfactants in water with ultrasonic irradiation. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000, 34(2): 311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weavers L K, Ling F H, Hoffmann M R. Aromatic compound degradation in water using a combination of sonolysis and ozonolysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 1998, 32(18): 2727–2733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mills G, Hoffmann M R. Photocatalytic degradation of pentachlorophenol on titanium dioxide particles-identification of intermediates and mechanism of reaction. Environmental Science & Technology, 1993, 27(8): 1681–1689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Willberg D M, Lang P S, Höchemer R H, Kratel A, Hoffmann M R. Degradation of 4-chlorophenol, 3,4-dichloroaniline, and 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene in an electrohydraulic discharge reactor. Environmental Science & Technology, 1996, 30(8): 2526–2534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu Z C, Zhou M H. Partial degradation of phenol by advanced electrochemical oxidation process. Environmental Science & Technology, 2001, 35(13): 2698–2703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jung K S, Kwon J H, Son S M, Shin J S, Lee G D, Park S S. Characteristics of the copper phthalocyanines synthesized at various conditions under the classical and microwave processes. Synthetic Metals, 2004, 141(3): 259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abramovitch R A, Zhou H B, Davis M, Peters L. Decomposition of PCB’s and other polychlorinated aromatics in soil using microwave energy. Chemosphere, 1998, 37(8): 1427–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Caddick S. Microwave assisted organic reactions. Tetrahedron, 1995, 51(38): 10403–10432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tai H S, Jou C J G. Application of granular activated carbon packedbed reactor in microwave radiation field to treat phenol. Chemosphere, 1999, 38(11): 2667–2680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lai T L, Lee C C, Wu K S, Shu Y Y, Wang C B. Microwaveenhanced catalytic degradation of phenol over nickel oxide. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2006, 68(3–4): 147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Horikoshi S, Hidaka H, Serpone N. Environmental remediation by an integrated microwave/UV-illumination method. 1. Microwave-assisted degradation of rhodamine-B dye in aqueous TiO2 dispersions. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(6): 1357–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Horikoshi S, Hidaka H, Serpone N. Hydroxyl radicals in microwave photocatalysis. Enhanced formation of OH radicals probed by ESR techniques in microwave-assisted photocatalysis in aqueous TiO2 dispersions. Chemical Physics Letters, 2003, 376(3–4): 475–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kataoka S, Tompkins D T, Zeltner W A, Anderson M A. Photocatalytic oxidation in the presence of microwave irradiation: observations with ethylene and water. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry, 2002, 148(1–3): 323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhao D M, Jin N R, Wu C X. Degradation of phenol aqueous solution using MW/H2O2 system. Huagong Xuebao (Chinese Edition), 2007, 58(7): 1736–1740 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhao D M, Fei K F. Synergetic kinetics of phenol degradation in water by using microwave/H2O2 system. Huagong Xuebao (Chinese Edition), 2008, 59(1): 101–105 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bari S S, Bose A K, Chaudhary A G, Manhas M S, Raju V S, Robb E W. Reactions accelerated by microwave radiation in the undergraduate organic laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 1992, 69(11): 938–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pougnet M A B. Modification of a commercial microwave-oven for applications in the chemical laboratory. Review of Scientific Instruments, 1993, 64(2): 529–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Horikoshi S, Hidaka H, Serpone N. Environmental remediation by an integrated microwave/UV-illumination method II: Characteristics of a novel UV-VIS-microwave integrated irradiation device in photodegradation processes. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry, 2002, 153(1–3): 185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu X T, Quan X, Bo L L, Chen S, Zhao Y Z. Simultaneous pentachlorophenol decomposition and granular activated carbon regeneration assisted by microwave irradiation. Carbon, 2004, 42(2): 415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Park M, Komarneni S, Roy R. Microwave-hydrothermal decomposition of chlorinated organic compounds. Materials Letters, 2000, 43(5–6): 259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shi H X, Zhao D M, Lei L C, Wang D H. Synergetic kinetics of phenol degradation in water using ultrasonic/H2O2 system. Huagong Xuebao (Chinese Edition), 2003, 54(10): 1436–1441 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    De A K, Chaudhuri B, Bhattacharjee S, Dutta B K. Estimation of *OH radical reaction rate constants for phenol and chlorinated phenols using UV/H2O2 photo-oxidation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1999, 64(1): 91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sanz J, Lombrana J I, De Luis A M, Ortueta M, Varona F. Microwave and Fenton’s reagent oxidation of wastewater. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2003, 1(1): 45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sawyer D T. Oxygen Chemistry: The International Series of Monographs on Chemistry. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haag W R, Yao C C D. Rate constants for reaction of hydroxyl radicals with several drinking-water ontaminants. Environmental Science & Technology, 1992, 26(5): 1005–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shen Y S, Ku Y, Lee K C. The effect of light absorbance on the decomposition of chlorophenols by ultraviolet radiation and UV/H2O2 processes. Water Research, 1995, 29(3): 907–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Apak R, Hugül M. Photooxidation of some mono-, di-, and trichlorophenols in aqueous solution by hydrogen peroxide/UV combinations. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 1996, 67(3): 221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Christensen H, Sehested K, Corfitzen H. Reactions of hydroxyl radicals with hydrogen peroxide at ambient and elevated temperatures. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1982, 86(9): 1588–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhou M H, Wu Z C, Shi Y, Li W, Zhong Z T, Ye Q. Synergetic kinetics of phenolic wastewater treatment using UV/H2O2 systems. Gaoxiao Huaxue Gongcheng Xuebao, 2002, 16(5): 536–541 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Joglekar H S, Samant S D, Joshi J B. Kinetics of wet air oxidation of phenol and substituted phenols. Water Research, 1991, 25(2): 135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Esplugas S, Giménez J, Contreras S, Pascual E, Rodríguez M. Comparison of different advanced oxidation processes for phenol degradation. Water Research, 2002, 36(4): 1034–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tryba B, Morawski A W, Inagaki M, Toyoda M. The kinetics of phenol decomposition under UV irradiation with and without H2O2 on TiO2, Fe-TiO2 and FecC-TiO2 photocatalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2006, 63(3–4): 215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Chemical Engineering and Materials ScienceZhejiang University of TechnologyHangzhouChina
  2. 2.W. M. Keck LaboratoriesCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations