Particulate matter and metals partitioning in highway rainfall-runoff

Research Article


This study investigated the particulate matter (PM) and metals in highway dry deposition and rainfall-runoff as a function of hydrologic transport and settling on an event basis. Events were differentiated as mass-limited (ML) and flow-limited (FL). Results indicate that unique and separate suspended sediment concentration (SSC) relationships with turbidity occurred for ML and FL events. Sixty minutes of quiescent settling produced a single SSC-turbidity relationship for all events. ML events transport higher proportions of settleable and sediment PM while FL events transported relatively higher suspended PM. For batch clarification with one hour of settling, ML events had generally higher treatment efficiencies compared to FL events for the same settling conditions. Highway dry deposition PM was hetero-disperse and coarse (d 50 m = 304 μm). Results indicate that the acidic rainfall is not a significant contributor to metals in runoff but is capable of leaching metals from dry deposition PM into runoff. Partitioning in retained runoff resulted in a particulate-bound predominance for most metals except Ca and Mg. While the finer fraction of dry deposition PM (< 75 μm) generates the highest metal concentrations, the highest metal mass is associated with the coarser fraction (> 75 μm).


stormwater particulate matter (PM) turbidity suspended sediment concentration (SSC) unit operations metals dry deposition acid rain 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sansalone J, Ying G. Characteristics, transport and solubility of dry particulate metals deposited on urban highway area. Water Research, 2008, 42(15): 4146–4162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colman J A, Friesz P J. Geohydrology and limnology of Walden Pond, Concord, Massachusetts. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4137, 2001, 61Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Drapper D, Tominson R, Williams P. Pollutant concentrations in road runoff: Southeast queensland case study. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2000, 126(4): 313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee J G, Heaney J P. Estimation of urban imperviousness and its impacts on storm water systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2003, 129(5): 429–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muschack W. Pollution of street run-off by traffic and local conditions. Science of the Total Environment, 1990, 93: 419–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sansalone JJ, Buchberger S G. Partitioning and first flush of metals in urban roadway storm water. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1997, 123(2): 134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sansalone J J, Koran J M, Smithson J A. Physical characteristics of urban roadway solids transported during rain event. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1998, 124(5): 427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sansalone J J, Cristina C M. First flush concepts for suspended and dissolved solids in small impervious watersheds. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2004, 130(11): 1301–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Motelay-Massei A, Ollivon D, Tiphagne K, Garban B. Atmospheric bulk deposition of trace metals to the seine river basin: Concentrations, sources and evolution from 1998 to 2001 in Paris. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2005, 164: 119135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shaheen D. Contribution of Urban Roadway Usage to Water Pollution. EPA-600/2-75-004, United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1975Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellis J B, Revitt D M, Harrop D O, Beckwith P R. The contribution of highway surfaces to urban stormwater sediments and metal loadings. The Science of the Total Environment, 1987, 59: 339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yousef Y A, Hvitved-Jacobsen T, Wanielista M P, Harper H H. Removal of contaminants in highway runoff through Swales. The Science of the Total Environment, 1987, 59: 391–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grant S B, Rekhi N V, Pise N R, Reeves R L. A Review of the Contaminants and Toxicity Associated With Particles in Stormwater Runoff. CTSW-RT-03-059.73.15, California Department of Transportation. 2003Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cristina C M, Sansalone J J. “First Flush,” power law and particle separation diagrams for urban storm-water suspended particulates. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2003, 129(4): 298–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gray J R, Glysson D, Turcios L, Schwarz G. Comparability of suspended-sediment concentration and total suspended solids data. Water-Resources Investigation Report 00-4191, USGS. 2000Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bent G C. Effects of forest-management activities on runoff components and ground-water recharge to Quabbin Reservoir, Central Massachusetts. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001, 143(1–3): 115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    ASTM. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes, D2487-06. Pennsylvania: ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2002Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lewis J. Turbidity-controlled suspended sediment sampling for runoff-event load estimation. Water Resources Research, 1996, 32(7): 2299–2310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gippel C J. The use of turbidimeters in suspended sediment research. Hydrobiologia, 1989, 77: 465–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    USEPA. USEPA Issue Paper—Measurement of TSS in Runoff. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), I:189-FR977001, URS Greiner Woodward Clyde. 1999Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gippel C J. Potential of turbidity monitoring for measuring the transport of suspended solids in streams. Hydrological Processes, 1995, 9: 83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Packman, J J, Comings K J, Booth D B. Using turbidity to determine total suspended solids in urbanizing streams in the Puget Lowlands. Vancouver, B C: Canadian Water Resources Association annual meeting, 1999, 158–165Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim J Y, Sansalone J. Event-based size distributions of particulate matter transported during urban rainfall-runoff events. Water Research, 2008, 42: 2756–2768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ASTM. Standard Practice for Dry Preparation of Soil Samples for Particle-Size Analysis and Determination of Soil Constants. West Conshohocken, Pa, 1993, Vol. 04 and 08Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ying G, Sansalone J. Granulometric relationships for urban source area runoff as a function of hydrologic event classification and sedimentation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2008, 193(1): 229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dean C M, Sansalone J J, Cartledge F K, Pardue J H. Influence of hydrology on rainfall-runoff metal element speciation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2005, 131(4): 632–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Engineering SciencesUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations