Advertisement

Comparison between linear and non-linear forms of pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetic models for the removal of methylene blue by activated carbon

  • Junxiong LinEmail author
  • Lan Wang
Short Communication

Abstract

The best-fit equations of linear and non-linear forms of the two widely used kinetic models, namely pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order equations, were compared in this study. The experimental kinetics of methylene blue adsorption on activated carbon was used for this research. Both the correlation coefficient (R 2) and the normalized standard deviation Δq(%) were employed as error analysis methods to determine the best-fitting equations. The results show that the non-linear forms of pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models were more suitable than the linear forms for fitting the experimental data. The experimental kinetics may have been distorted by linearization of the linear kinetic equations, and thus, the non-linear forms of kinetic equations should be primarily used to obtain the adsorption parameters. In addition, the Δq(%) method for error analysis may be better to determine the best-fitting model in this case.

Keywords

adsorption pseudo-first order pseudo-second order kinetic model linear method non-linear method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wu F C, Tseng R L, Juang R S. Kinetic modeling of liquid-phase adsorption of reactive dyes and metal ions on chitosan. Water Research, 2001, 35(3): 613–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tan I AW, Ahmad A L, Hameed B H. Adsorption of basic dye on high-surface-area activated carbon prepared from coconut husk: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 154(1–3): 337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lagergren S. About the theory of so-called adsorption of soluble substances. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, 1898, 24: 1–39Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blanchard G, Maunaye M, Martin G. Removal of heavy metals from waters by means of natural zeolites. Water Research, 1984, 18: 1501–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ho Y S. Adsorption of heavy metals from waste streams by peat. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 1995Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Azizian S. Kinetic models of sorption: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2004, 276: 47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ho Y S. Selection of optimum sorption isotherm. Carbon, 2004, 42(10): 2115–2116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vasanth K K, Sivanesan S. Comparison of linear and non-linear method in estimating the sorption isotherm parameters for safranin onto activated carbon. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2005, B123(1–3): 288–292Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsai S C, Juang K W. Comparison of linear and nonlinear forms of isotherm models for strontium sorption on a sodium bentonite. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2000, 243(3): 741–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Azizian S, Haerifar M, Basiri-Parsa J. Extended geometric method: A simple approach to derive adsorption rate constants of Langmuir-Freundlich kinetics. Chemosphere, 2007, 68: 2040–2046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ho Y S. Second-order kinetic model for the sorption of cadmium onto tree fern: A comparison of linear and non-linear methods. Water Research, 2006, 40(1): 119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yasmin K, Kalpana M, Shaik B, Bhavanath J. Pseudo-second-order kinetic models for the sorption of Hg(II) onto dead biomass of marine Aspergillus niger: Comparison of linear and non-linear methods. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2008, 328: 40–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin J X, Zhan S L, Fang M H, Qian X Q. The adsorption of dyes from aqueous solution using diatomite. Journal of Porous Materials, 2007, 14(4): 449–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin J X, Zhan S L, Fang M H, Qian X Q, Yang H. Adsorption of basic dye from aqueous solution onto fly ash. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 87(1): 193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Royer B, Cardoso N F, Lima E C, Vaghetti J C P, Simon N M, Calvete T, Veses R C. Applications of Brazilian-pine fruit shell in natural and carbonized forms as adsorbents to removal of methylene blue from aqueous solutions-Kinetic and equilibrium study. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 164(2–3): 1213–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vaghetti J C P, Lima E C, Royer B, Cunha B M D, Cardoso N F, Brasil J L, Dias S L P. Pecan nutshell as biosorbent to remove Cu(II), Mn(II) and Pb(II) from aqueous solutions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 162, 270–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vaghetti J C P, Lima E C, Royer B, Brasil J L, Cunha BMD, Simon N M, Cardoso N F, Noreña C P Z. Application of Brazilian-pine fruit coat as a biosorbent to removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution-Kinetics and equilibrium study. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 42: 67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials and TextilesZhejiang Sci-Tech UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations