Advertisement

Journal of Central South University

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 2404–2414 | Cite as

Cracks coalescence mechanism and cracks propagation paths in rock-like specimens containing pre-existing random cracks under compression

  • Hadi Haeri
  • Kourosh Shahriar
  • Mohammad Fatehi Marji
  • Parviz Moarefvand
Article

Abstract

The mechanism of cracks propagation and cracks coalescence due to compressive loading of the brittle substances containing pre-existing cracks (flaws) was modeled experimentally using specially made rock-like specimens from Portland Pozzolana Cement (PPC). The breakage process of the specimens was studied by inserting single and double flaws with different inclination angles at the center and applying uniaxial compressive stress at both ends of the specimen. The first crack was oriented at 50° from the horizontal direction and kept constant throughout the analysis while the orientation of the second crack was changed. It is experimentally observed that the wing cracks are produced at the first stage of loading and start their propagation toward the direction of uniaxial compressive loading. The secondary cracks may also be produced in form of quasi-coplanar and/or oblique cracks in a stable manner. The secondary cracks may eventually continue their propagation in the direction of maximum principle stress. These experimental works were also simulated numerically by a modified higher order displacement discontinuity method and the cracks propagation and cracks coalescence were studied based on Mode I and Mode II stress intensity factors (SIFs). It is concluded that the wing cracks initiation stresses for the specimens change from 11.3 to 14.1 MPa in the case of numerical simulations and from 7.3 to 13.8 MPa in the case of experimental works. It is observed that cracks coalescence stresses change from 21.8 to 25.3 MPa and from 19.5 to 21.8 MPa in the numerical and experimental analyses, respectively. Comparing some of the numerical and experimental results with those recently cited in the literature validates the results obtained by the proposed study. Finally, a numerical simulation was accomplished to study the effect of confining pressure on the crack propagation process, showing that the SIFs increase and the crack initiation angles change in this case.

Key words

crack propagation crack coalescence rock-like specimen numerical simulation experiment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    MILLER J T, EINSTEI H H. Crack coalescence tests on granite [C]// Proceedings of 42nd US Rock Mechanics Symposium. San Francisco, ARMA, 2008: 8–162.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    WONG L N Y, EINSTEIN H H. Systematic evaluation of cracking behavior in specimens containing single flaws under uniaxial compression [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Scie, 2009, 46: 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    YANG S Q. Crack coalescence behavior of brittle sandstone samples containing two coplanar fissures in the process of deformation failure [J]. Engin Fract Mech, 2011, 78: 3059–3081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    HAERI H, SHAHRIAR K, MARJI M F, MOAREFVAND P. On the crack propagation analysis of rock like Brazilian disc specimens containing cracks under compressive line loading, [J]. La Am J Solids and Structures, 2013.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    JAEIRO R P, EINSTEIN H H. Experimental study of the cracking behavior of specimens containing inclusions (under uniaxial compression) [J]. Int J Fract, 2010, 164: 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    KE C C, CHEN C S, TU C H. Determination of fracture toughness of anisotropic rocks by boundary element method [J]. Rock Mech Rock Engng, 2008, 41: 509–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    TANG Chun-an, YANG yue-feng. Crack branching mechanism of rock-like quasi-brittle materials under dynamic stress [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19: 3273–3284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    ZHAO Yan-lin, CAO Ping, WANG Wei-jun, WAN Wen, CHEN Rui. Wing crack model subjected to high hydraulic pressure and far field stresses and its numerical simulation [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19: 578–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    BEHNIA M, GOSHTASBI K, MARJI M F, GOLSHAI A. Numerical simulation of crack propagation in layered formations [J/OL]. Arab J Geosci, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s12517-013-0885-6.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Ghazvinian A, NEJATI HR, SARFARAZI V, HADEI M R. Mixed mode crack propagation in low brittle rock-like materials [J/OL]. Arab J Geosci. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s12517-012-0681-8.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    LI H, WONG L N Y. Influence of flaw inclination angle and loading condition on crack initiation and propagation [J]. Int J Solids and Structures, 2012, 49: 2482–2499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    HAERI H, SHAHRIAR K, MARJI M F. MOAREFVAD P. A coupled numerical-experimental study of the breakage process of brittle substances [J/OL]. Arab J Geosci, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s12517-013-1165-1.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    BOMBOLAKIS E G. Photoelastic study of initial stages of brittle fracture in compression [J]. Tectonophysics, 1968, 6: 461–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    JIEFAN H, GANGLIN C, YONGHONG Z, REN W. An experimental study of the strain field development prior to failure of a marble plate under compression [J]. Tectonophysics, 1990, 175: 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    BOBET A. The initiation of secondary cracks in compression [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000, 66: 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    PARK N S. Crack Propagation and coalescence in rock under uniaxial compression. [D]. Seoul: Seoul National University, 2001.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    WONG R H C, CHAU K T, TANG C A, LIN P. Analysis of crack coalescence in rock-like materials containing three flaws: Part I. Experimental approach [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Scie, 2001, 38: 909–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    SAHOURYEH E, DYSKIN A V, GERMANOVICH L N. Crack growth under biaxial compression [J]. Engin Fract Mech, 2002, 69: 2187–2198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    LI Y P, CHEN L Z, WANG Y H. Experimental research on pre-cracked marble under compression [J]. Int J Solids and Structures, 2005, 42: 2505–2516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    PARK C H, BOBET A. The initiation of slip on frictional fractures. Golden rocks [R]. ARMA/USRMS, 2006: 06–923.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    PARK C H, BOBET A. Crack Initiation and propagation from frictional fractures [C]// Proceedings of 1st Canada-US Rock Mechanics Symposium. 2007: 557–564.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    WONG L N Y, EINSTEIN H H. Crack coalescence in molded gypsum and Carrara marble: Part 1. Macroscopic observations and interpretation [J]. Rock Mech Rock Engine, 2008, 42: 475–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    WONG L N Y, EINSTEIN H H. Crack coalescence in molded gypsum and Carrara marble: Part 2. Microscopic observations and interpretation [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2008, 42: 513–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    PARK C H. Coalescence of frictional fractures in rock materials [D]. Indiana, Purdue University West Lafayette, 2008.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    PARK C H, BOBET A. Crack coalescence in specimens with open and closed flaws: A comparison [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Scie, 2009, 46: 819–829C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    YANG Q, DAI Y H, HAN L J, JIN Z Q. Experimental study on mechanical behavior of brittle marble samples containing different flaws under uniaxial compression [J]. Engin Fract Mech, 2009, 76: 1833–1845S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    PARK C H, BOBET A. Crack initiation, propagation and coalescence from frictional flaws in uniaxial compression [J]. Engin Fract Mech, 2010, 77: 2727–2748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    LEE H, JEON S. An experimental and numerical study of fracture coalescence in pre-cracked specimens under uniaxial compression [J]. Int J of Solids and Structures, 2011, 48: 979–999.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    PU Cheng-zhi, CAO Ping. Failure characteristics and its influencing factors of rock-like material with multi-fissures under uniaxial compression [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2012, 22: 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    ERDOGAN F, SIH G C. On the crack extension in plates under loading and transverse shear [J]. J Fluids Eng, 1963, 85: 519–527.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    HUSSIAN MA, PU E L, UNDERWOOD J H. Strain energy release rate for a crack under combined mode I and mode II [R]. Fracture Analysis. ASTM STP 560. American Society for Testing and Materials, 1974: 2–28.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    SIH G C. Strain-energy-density factor applied to mixed mode crack problems [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 1974, 10: 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    SHEN B, STEPHANSSON O. Modification of the G-criterion for crack propagation subjected to compression [J]. Engin Fract Mech, 1994, 47: 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    MARJI M F, HOSSEIN NASAB H, KOHSARY A H. On the uses of special crack tip elements in numerical rock fracture mechanics [J]. Int J Solids and Structures, 2006, 43: 1669–1692.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    MARJI M F. On the use of power series solution method in the crack analysis of brittle materials by indirect boundary element method [J]. Engin Fract Mech, 2013, 98: 365–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    WONG R H C, TANG C A, CHAU K T, LIN P. Splitting failure in brittle rocks containing pre-existing flaws under uniaxial compression [J]. Engin Frac Mecha, 2002, 69: 1853–1871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    MANOUCHEHRIAN A, MARJI M F. Numerical analysis of confinement effect on crack propagation mechanism from a flaw in a pre-cracked rock under compression [J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2012, 28: 1389–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    CROUCH S L. Analysis of stresses and displacements around underground excavations: An application of the Displacement Discontinuity Method. University of Minnesota Geomechanics Report [R]. Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1967.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    GUO H, AZIZ N I, SCHMIDT R A. Linear elastic crack tip modeling by displacement discontinuity method [J]. Engin Fract Mech, 1990, 36: 933–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    SCAVIA C. Fracture mechanics approach to stability analysis of crack slopes [J]. Engng Fract Mech, 1990, 35: 889–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    ALIABADI M H, ROOKE D P. Numerical Fracture Mechanics [M]. Southampton, U.K., Computational Mechanics Publications, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    BEHNIA M, GOSHTASBI K, MARJI M F, GOLSHANI A. On the crack propagation modeling of hydraulic fracturing by a hybridized displacement discontinuity/boundary collocation method [J]. J Min and Enviro, 2011, 2: 1–16Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    HAERI H, SHAHRIAR K, MARJI M F, MOAREFVAND P. Modeling the propagation mechanism of two random micro cracks in rock samples under uniform tensile loading [C]// Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Fracture. Beijing, China, 2013.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    HAERI H, AHRANJANI K A. A fuzzy logic model to predict crack propagation angle under disc cutters of TBM [J]. Int J Academic Research, 2012, 4: 159–169.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    CROUCH S L, STARFIELD A M. Boundary element methods in solid mechanics [M]. London, Allen and Unwin, 1983.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    WHITTAKER, B N, SINGH R N, SUN Q. Rock fracture mechanics, principals, design and applications, developments in geotechnical engineering [R]. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1992.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    ALIABADI M H. Fracture of rocks [M]. Southampton, U.K.: Computational Mechanics Publications, 1998.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    SHOU K J, CROUCH S L. A higher order displacement discontinuity method for analysis of crack problems [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci and Geomech, Abstr, 1995, 32: 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    HAERI H. Numerical modeling of the interaction between micro and macro cracks in the rock fracture mechanism using displacement discontinuity method [D]. Department of Mining Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, 2013.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    IRWIN G R. Analysis of stress and strains near the end of a crack [J]. J Appl Mech, 1957, 24: 361–364.Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    MARJI M F, DEHGHAI I. Kinked crack analysis by a hybridized boundary element/boundary collocation method [J]. Int J Solids and Structures, 2010, 47: 922–933.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Central South University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hadi Haeri
    • 1
  • Kourosh Shahriar
    • 2
  • Mohammad Fatehi Marji
    • 3
  • Parviz Moarefvand
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mining Engineering, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Mining and Metallurgical EngineeringAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran
  3. 3.Mine Exploitation Engineering Department, Faculty of Mining and Metallurgy, Institution of EngineeringYazd UniversityYazdIran

Personalised recommendations