Journal of Central South University

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 317–325 | Cite as

Testing of NAPL simulator to predict migration of a light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) under water table fluctuation in a sandy medium

  • Jing-feng Zhou (周劲风)
  • Yan Li (李雁)
  • Jun Xu (徐军)
  • M. Kamon
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

Nanoqueous phase liquid (NAPL) simulator is a powerful and popular mathematical model for modeling the flow and transport of non-aqueous phase liquids in subsurface, but the testing of its feasibility under water table fluctuation has received insufficient attention. The feature in a column test was tested through two cycles of water table fluctuation. The sandy medium in the column was initially saturated, and each cycle of water table fluctuation consisted of one water table falling and one rising, resulting in a drainage and an imbibition of the medium, respectively. It was found that the difference between the simulated and measured results in the first drainage of the column test was minor. However, with the propagation of the water table fluctuations, the simulation errors increased, and the simulation accuracy was not acceptable except for the first drainage in the two fluctuation cycles. The main reason was proved to be the estimation method of residual saturation used in this simulator. Also, based on the column tests, it was assumed that the resulting residual saturation from an incomplete imbibition process was a constant, with a value equal to that of the residual value resulting from the main imbibition process. The results obtained after modifying NAPL simulator with this assumption were found to be more accurate in the first cycle of water table fluctuation, but this accuracy decreased rapidly in the second one. It is concluded that NAPL simulator is not adequate in the case of LNAPL migration under water table fluctuation in sandy medium, unless a feasible assumption to estimate residual saturation is put forward.

Key words

light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) saturation-capillary pressure relation electrical conductivity probe simulation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    ZHAO W S, IOANNIDIS M A. Effect of NAPL film stability on the dissolution of residual wetting NAPL in porous media: A pore-scale modeling study [J]. Adv Water Resour, 2007, 30(2): 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    KECHAVARZI C, SOGA K, ILLANGASEKARE T H. Two-dimensional laboratory simulation of LNAPL infiltration and redistribution in the vadose zone [J]. J Contam Hydrol, 2005, 76: 221–233.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    RAHBEH M E, MOHTAR R H. Application of multiphase transport models to field remediation by air sparging and soil vapor extraction [J]. J Hazard Mater, 2007, 143: 156–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    MOHTAR R H, SEGERLIND L J, WALLACE R B. Finite element analysis for air sparging in porous media [J]. Fluid/Particle Separation Journal, 1996, 9(3): 225–239.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    CHAN T P, GOVINDARAJU R S. A stochastic-advective transport model for NAPL dissolution and degradation in non-uniform flows in porous media [J]. J Contam Hydrol, 2006, 87: 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    FAGERLUND F, NIEMI A. A partially coupled, fraction-by-fraction modelling approach to the subsurface migration of gasoline spills [J]. J Contam Hydrol, 2007, 89: 174–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    WATSON I A, CROUCH R S, BASTIAN P, OSWALD S E. Advantages of using adaptive remeshing and parallel processing for modeling biodegradation in groundwater [J]. Adv Water Resour, 2005, 28: 1143–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    POLLARD S J T, HOUGH R L, KIM K H, BELLARBY J, PATON G, SEMPLE K T, COULON F. Fugacity modelling to predict the distribution of organic contaminants in the soil: Oil matrix of constructed biopiles [J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 71: 1432–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    YU S Y, FREITAS J G, UNGER A J A, BARKER J F, CHATZIS J. Simulating the evolution of an ethanol and gasoline source zone within the capillary fringe [J]. J Contam Hydrol, 2009, 105: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    GUARNACCIA J, PINDER G, FISHMAN M. NAPL: Simulator documentation [R]. EPA/600/R-97/102. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, USEPA, Ada, OK 74820, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    KECHAVARZI C, SOGA K, ILLANGASEKARE T H. Two-dimensional laboratory simulation of LNAPL infiltration and redistribution in the vadose zone [J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2005, 76: 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    STEFFY D A, JOHNSTON C D, BARRY D A. Numerical simulations and long-column tests of LNAPL displacement and trapping by a fluctuating water table [J]. J Soil Conta, 1998, 7(3): 325–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    KAMON M, LI Y, INUI T, KATSUMI T. Experimental study on the measurement of S-p relations of LNAPL in a porous medium [J]. Soils Found, 2007, 47(1): 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    ENDO K. Characteristics of DNAPL migration at a contaminated site and its pollution assessment (in Japanese) [D]. Kyoto University, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    van GENUCHTEN M T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils [J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1980, 44(5): 892–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    van GEEL P J, SYKES J F. The importance of fluid entrapment, saturation hysteresis and residual saturations on the distribution of a lighter-than-water non-aqueous phase liquid in a variably saturated sand medium [J]. J Cont Hydr, 1997, 25(3/4): 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    HILFER R. Capillary pressure, hysteresis and residual saturation in porous media [J]. Physica A, 2006, 359: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    POULOVASSILIS A. The effect of the entrapped air on the hysteresis curves of a porous body and on its hydraulic conductivity [J]. Soil Sci, 1970, 109(3): 154–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    ZALIDIS G C, WALLACE R B, VOICE T C. Influence of initial water saturation on the residual saturation of an organic liquid in the vadose zone [J]. Water Resour Manag, 1998, 12: 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    van GEEL P J, ROY S D. A proposed model to include a residual NAPL saturation in a hysteretic capillary pressure-saturation relationship [J]. J Cont Hydr, 2002, 58(1/2): 79–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    LAND C S. Calculation of imbibiiton relative permeability for two-and three-phase flow from rock properties [J]. Trans Am Inst Min Metall Pet Eng, 1968, 243: 149–156.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    BEAR J. Dynamics of fluids in porous media [M]. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1972: 450–451.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    COREY A T. Mechanics of immiscible fluids in porous media [M]. Colorado: Water Resources Publications, 1994: 41–43.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    FETTER C W. Contaminant hydrogeology, upper saddle River [M]. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., Simon & Schuster/A Viacom Company, 1999: 211–212Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Central South University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing-feng Zhou (周劲风)
    • 1
  • Yan Li (李雁)
    • 2
  • Jun Xu (徐军)
    • 3
  • M. Kamon
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Marine SciencesSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.School of Earth Sciences and EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjingChina
  4. 4.Takamatsu National College of TechnologyKagawaJapan

Personalised recommendations