Advertisement

Prediction method for surface finishing of spiral bevel gear tooth based on least square support vector machine

  • Ning Ma (马 宁)
  • Wen-ji Xu (徐文骥)Email author
  • Xu-yue Wang (王续跃)
  • Ze-fei Wei (魏泽飞)
  • Gui-bing Pang (庞桂兵)
Article

Abstract

The predictive model of surface roughness of the spiral bevel gear (SBG) tooth based on the least square support vector machine (LSSVM) was proposed. A nonlinear LSSVM model with radial basis function (RBF) kernel was presented and then the experimental setup of PECF system was established. The Taguchi method was introduced to assess the effect of finishing parameters on the gear tooth surface roughness, and the training data was also obtained through experiments. The comparison between the predicted values and the experimental values under the same conditions was carried out. The results show that the predicted values are found to be approximately consistent with the experimental values. The mean absolute percent error (MAPE) is 2.43% for the surface roughness and 2.61% for the applied voltage.

Key words

pulse electrochemical finishing (PECF) surface roughness least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) prediction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    FAN Q, DAFOE R S, SWANGER J W. Higher-order tooth flank form error correction for face-milled spiral bevel and hypoid gears [J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2008, 130(7): 072601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    NAKATSUJIN T, MORI A. Pitting durability of electrolytically polished medium carbon steel gears-succeeding report [J]. Tribology Transactions, 1999, 42(2): 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    WEI Bing-yang, DENG Xiao-zhong, FANG Zong-de. Study on ultrasonic-assisted lapping of gears [J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2007, 47(12/13): 2051–2056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    MAHDAVINEJAD R, HATAMI M. On the application of electrochemical machining for inner surface polishing of gun barrel chamber [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2008, 202: 307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    RAMASAWMY H, BLUNT L. Investigation of the effect of electrochemical polishing on EDM surfaces [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2007, 31: 1135–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    ZHOU Jin-jin, PANG Gui-bing, WANG Hui, XU Wen-ji. Research on pulse electrochemical finishing using a moving cathode [J]. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 2005, 7: 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    MCGEOUGH J A. Principles of electrochemical machining [M]. London: Chapman and Hall, 1974: 1–10.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    KOZAK J, RAJUKAR K P. WEI B. Modelling and analysis of pulse electrochemical machining [J]. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1994, 116(3): 316–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    RAJURKAR K P, WEI, B, KOZAK, J, MCGEOUGH J A. Modelling and monitoring interelectrode gap in pulse electrochemical machining [J]. Annals of CIRP, 1995, 44(1): 177–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    HEWIDY M S. Controlling of metal removal thickness in ECM process [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2005, 160: 348–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    LI Xi, CAO Guang-yi, ZHU Xin-jian. Modeling and control of PEMFC based on least squares support vector machines [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47: 1032–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    SHI, D F, GINDY N N. Tool wear predictive model based on least squares support vector machines [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2007, 21(4): 1799–1814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    LI Yan-bin, ZHANG Ning, LI Cun-bin. Support vector machine forecasting method improved by chaotic particle swarm optimization and its application [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2009, 16(3): 478–481. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    VAPNIK V N. The nature of statistical learning theory [M]. New York: Springer, 1995: 181–218.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    SUYKENS J A K, GESTEL T V, BRABANTER J D, MOOR B D, VANDEWALLE J. Least squares support vector machines [M]. Singapore: World Scientific, 2002: 29–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    SUYKENS J A K, VANDEWALLE J, MOOR B D. Optimal control by least squares support vector machines [J]. Neural Networks, 2001, 14(1): 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    SUYKENS J A K, VANDEWALLE J. Least squares support vector machine classifiers [J]. Neural Processing Letters, 1999, 9(3): 293–300.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    RUSZAJ A, ZYBURA-SKRABALAK M. The mathematical modelling of electrochemical machining with flat ended universal electrodes [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2001, 109: 333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Central South University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ning Ma (马 宁)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wen-ji Xu (徐文骥)
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xu-yue Wang (王续跃)
    • 1
  • Ze-fei Wei (魏泽飞)
    • 1
  • Gui-bing Pang (庞桂兵)
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina
  2. 2.School of Electromechanical EngineeringShenyang Aerospace UniversityShenyangChina
  3. 3.School of Mechanical Engineering and AutomationDalian Polytechnic UniversityDalianChina

Personalised recommendations