Journal of Central South University

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 420–428 | Cite as

Impacts of land-use change on ecosystem service value in Changsha, China

  • Yun-guo Liu (刘云国)Email author
  • Xiao-xia Zeng (曾晓霞)
  • Li Xu (徐立)
  • Da-lun Tian (田大伦)
  • Guang-ming Zeng (曾光明)
  • Xin-jiang Hu (胡新将)
  • Yin-fang Tang (唐寅芳)


Changsha, a typical city in central China, was selected as the study area to assess the variations of ecosystem service value on the basis of land-use change. The analysis not only included the whole city but also the urban district where the landscape changed more rapidly in the center of the city. Two LANDSAT TM data sets in 1986 and 2000 and land use data of five urban districts from 1995 to 2005 were used to estimate the changes in the size of six land use categories. Meanwhile, previously published value coefficients were used to detect the changes in the value of ecosystem services delivered by each land category. The result shows that the total value of ecosystem services in Changsha declines from $1 009.28 million per year in 1986 to $938.11 million per year in 2000. This decline is largely attributable to the increase of construction land, and the conversion from woodland and water body to cropland to keep the crop production. In the five districts, there is $6.19 million decline in ecosystem service value between 1995 and 2005. Yuelu District has the highest unit ecosystem service value while Yuhua District has the lowest one. This may be attributed to the greater conversion from cropland and grassland to woodland and water body with the increase of construction land in Yuelu District. It is suggested that the increase rate of construction land should be controlled rigorously and the area of woodland and water body should be increased or at least retained in the study area.

Key words

land-use change urban expansion city scale district scale central China Changsha 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    LOPEZ E, BOCCO G, MENDOZA M, DUHAU E. Predicting land-cover and land-use change in the urban fringe: A case in Morelia city, Mexico [J]. Landscape Urban Planning, 2001, 55(4): 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    ZHANG Wen-guang, HU Yuan-man, HU Jin-chu, CHANG Yu, ZHANG Jing, LIU Miao. Impacts of land-use change on mammal diversity in the upper reaches of Minjiang River, China: Implications for biodiversity conservation planning [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 85(3/4): 195–204.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, de GROOT R, FARBER S, GRASSO M, HANNON B, LIMBURG K, NAEEM S, O’NEILL R V, PARUELO J, RASKIN R G, SUTTON P, BELT M. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997, 387(15): 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    TOBIAS D, MENDELSOHN R. Valuing ecotourism in a tropical rain-forest reserve [J]. Ambio, 1991, 20(2): 91–93.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    McNEELY J A. Economic incentives for conserving biodiversity: Lessons for Africa [J]. Ambio, 1993, 2/3(22): 144–150.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    CHOPRA K. The value of non-timber forest products: An estimation for tropical deciduous forests in India [J]. Economic Botany, 1993, 47(3): 251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    CACHA M D M. Starting resource accounting in protected areas [M]// MUNASINGHE M, MCNEELY J. Protected Area Economics and Policy. Cambridge: IUCN, 1994: 151–157.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    MUNASINGHE M, MCNEELY J. Economic and policy issues in natural habitats and protected areas [M]// MUNASINGHE M, MCNEELY J. Protected Area Economics and Policy. Cambridge: IUCN, 1994: 15–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    GREN I M, GROTH K H, SYLVEN M. Economic values of Danube floodplains [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1995, 45(4): 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    GUO Zhong-wei, XIAO Xiang-ming, LI Dian-mo. An assessment of ecosystem services: Water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production [J]. Ecological Applications, 2000, 10(3): 925–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    CURTIS I A. Valuing ecosystem goods and services: A new approach using a surrogate market and the combination of a multiple criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributes [J]. Ecological Economics, 2004, 50(3/4): 163–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    PEARCE D, MORAN D. The economic value of biodiversity [M]. Cambridge: Earthscan Publications Ltd, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    GUO Zhong-wei, XIAO Xiang-ming, GAN Ya-ling, ZHANG Yue-jun. Ecosystem functions, services and their values: A case study in Xingshan County of China [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 38(1): 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    OUYANG Zhi-yun, WANG Ru-song, ZHAO Jing-zhu. Ecosystem services and their economic valuation [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1999, 10(5): 635–640. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    HEIN L, van KOPPEN K, de GROOT R S, van IERLAND E C. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services [J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 57(2): 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    KREUTER, U P, HARRIS H G., MATLOCK M D, LACEY R E. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39(3): 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    ZHAO Bin, KREURTER U, Li Bo, MA Zhi-jun, CHEN Jia-kuan, NAKAGOSHI N. An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China [J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(2): 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    VIGLIZZO E F, FRANK F C. Land-use options for Del Plata Basin in South America: Tradeoffs analysis based on ecosystem service provision [J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 57(1): 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    CAI Bang-cheng, LU Gen-fa, SONG Li-juan, HUANG He-ping, HAN Shang-fu, CHEN Ke-liang. Variation of ecosystem services’ value of Kunshan based on the land use change [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(9): 3005–3010. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    LIU Ji-yuan, ZHUANG Da-fang, LUO Di, XIAO Xiang-ming. Land-cover classification of China: Integrated analysis of AVHRR imagery and geo-physical data [J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2003, 24(12): 2485–2500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    LI Tian-hong, LI Wen-kai, QIAN Zheng-han. Variations in ecosystem service value in response to land use changes in Shenzhen [J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(7): 1427–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    LU Yuan-wang, WEI Liang-ying, MO Jian-fei. Land use change and its impact on values of ecosystem services in the West of Jilin Province [J]. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2006, 11(4): 1028–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    JIANG De-song, JIANG Chong, ZHAO Ming-hua. Bio-engineering protection mechanism of city rock slope and its laboratory test [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2008, 39(5): 1087–1093. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Central South University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yun-guo Liu (刘云国)
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Xiao-xia Zeng (曾晓霞)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Li Xu (徐立)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Da-lun Tian (田大伦)
    • 3
  • Guang-ming Zeng (曾光明)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xin-jiang Hu (胡新将)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yin-fang Tang (唐寅芳)
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Environmental Science and EngineeringHunan UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control of Ministry of EducationHunan UniversityChangshaChina
  3. 3.Life Science and Technical InstituteCentral South University of Forestry and TechnologyChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations