Advertisement

Journal of Central South University of Technology

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 1028–1033 | Cite as

Discrete element simulation of mechanical characteristic of conditioned sands in earth pressure balance shield tunneling

  • Li Wu (武 力)Email author
  • Fu-zheng Qu (屈福政)
Article

Abstract

The discrete element method (DEM) was used to simulate the flow characteristic and strength characteristic of the conditioned sands in the earth pressure balance (EPB) tunneling. In the laboratory the conditioned sands were reproduced and the slump test and the direct shear test of the conditioned sands were implemented. A DEM equivalent model that can simulate the macro mechanical characteristic of the conditioned sands was proposed, and the corresponding numerical models of the slump test and the shear test were established. By selecting proper DEM model parameters, the errors of the slump values between the simulation results and the test results are in the range of 10.3%–14.3%, and the error of the curves between the shear displacement and the shear stress calculated with the DEM simulation is 4.68%–16.5% compared with that of the laboratory direct shear test. This illustrates that the proposed DEM equivalent model can approximately simulate the mechanical characteristics of the conditioned sands, which provides the basis for further simulation of the interaction between the conditioned soil and the chamber pressure system of the EPB machine.

Key words

conditioned sands slump test direct shear test discrete element simulation earth pressure balance shield machine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    PEILA D, OGGERI C, VINAI R. Screw conveyor device for laboratory tests on conditioned soil for EPB tunneling operations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(12): 1622–1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    QUEBAUD S, SIBAI M, HENRY J P. Use of chemical foam for improvements in drilling by earth pressure balanced shields in granular soils[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1998, 13(2): 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    VINAI R, OGGERI C, PEILA D. Soil conditioning of sand for EPB applications: A laboratory research[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(3): 308–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    PSOMAS S. Properties of foam/sand mixtures for tunneling applications[D]. Michaelmas: University of Oxford, 2001.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    NEZAMI E G, HASHASH Y M A, ZHAO D W, GHABOUSSI J. Simulation of front end loader bucket-soil interaction[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2007, 31(9): 1147–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    MELIS-MAYNAR M J, MEDINA-RODRIGUEZ L E. Discrete numerical model for analysis of earth pressure balance tunnel excavation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(10): 1234–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    HOMER D A, PETERS J F, CARRILLO A. Large scale discrete element method modeling of vehicle-soil interaction[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2001, 127(10): 1027–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    FRANCO Y, RUBINSTEIN D, SHMULEVICH I. Prediction of soil-bulldozer blade interaction using discrete element method[J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2007, 50(2): 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    ZHOU Jian, CUI Ji-hong, JIA Min-cai, SHI Dan-da. Numerical simulation of cone penetration test by discrete element method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(11): 1604–1610. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    TANAKA H, MOMOZU M, OIDA A, YAMAZAKI M. Simulation of soil deformation and resistance at bar penetration by the distinct element method[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2000, 37(1): 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    ASAF Z, RUBINSTEIN D, SHMULEVICH I. Determination of discrete element model parameters required for soil tillage[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2007, 92(1/2): 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    LANDRY H, LAGUE C, ROBERGE M. Discrete element representation of manure products[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2006, 51(1/2): 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    KIM H, WAGONER M P, BUTTLAR W G. Simulation of fracture behavior in asphalt concrete using a heterogeneous cohesive zone discrete element model[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2008, 20(8): 552–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    ZHOU Jian, SU Yan, CHI Yong. Simulation of soil properties by particle flow code[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(3): 390–396. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    DANIEL D G, LOBO C L. User’s guide to ASTM specification C 94 on ready-mixed concrete: (MNL 49)[M]. New York: ASTM International, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    CUNDALL P A. PFC3D user’s manual[M]. Minneapolis: Itasca Consulting Group Inc, 2005: 395–397.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Central South University Press and Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations