Average cluster sizes and cluster size distributions of superfine nickel particles in light media

  • Jing-sheng Li (李敬生)Email author
  • Fei-hu Du (杜飞虎)
  • Juan Wang (王娟)


Effects of shear rates on average cluster sizes (ACSs) and cluster size distributions (CSDs) in uni- and bi-systems of partly charged superfine nickel particles were investigated by Brownian dynamics, and clustering properties in these systems were compared with those in non-polar systems. The results show that the ACSs in bi-polar systems are larger than those in the non-polar systems. In uni-polar systems the behavior of clustering property differs: at the lower ionic concentration (10%), repulsive force is not strong enough to break clusters, but may greatly weaken them. The clusters are eventually cracked into smaller ones only when concentration of uni-polar charged particles is large enough. In this work, the ionic concentration is 20%. The relationship between ACS and shear rates follows power law in a exponent range of 0.176–0.276. This range is in a good agreement with the range of experimental data, but it is biased towards the lower limit slightly.

Key words

ionic concentration average cluster sizes cluster size distribution power law 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    PIROG I V, NEDOSEIKINA T I. Study of effective pair potentials in cubic metals [J]. Physica B—Condensed Matter, 2003, 334(1/2): 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    DALGIC S S, DALGIC S, TEZGOR G. Transferable pair potentials for liquid iron, cobalt and nickel [J]. Physics and Chemistry of Liquids, 2002, 40: 539–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    FAN Jiu-ping, XU Xiao-hong, JIANG Feng-xian, TIAN Bao-qiang, WU Hai-shun. Microstructures and magnetic properties of [SiO2/FePt]5/Ag thin films [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2008, 15(1): 11–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    LAL M, PLUMMER M, RICHMOND N J, SMITH W. Solvation of metal nanoparticles in a subcritical-supercritical fluid: A computer simulation study [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004, 108(19): 6052–6061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    HUANG Pei, HUANG De-chun, XU Nan-ing, SHI Jun. Quantitative identification of nucleation and crystal growth stages in batch crystallization from solution [J]. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 2004, 25(3): 504–508. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    LI Jing-sheng, WANG Juan, SHEN Qin. Clustering properties of partly charged particles in a light medium [J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2007, 18(2): 1419–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    CHIALVO A A, SIMONSON J M. The structure of concentrated NiCl2 aqueous solutions: What is molecular simulation revealing about the neutron scattering methodologies? [J]. Molecular Physics, 2002, 100(14): 2307–2315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    CHILLEMI G, D’ANGELO P, PAVEL N V, SANNA N, BARONE V. Development and validation of an integrated computational approach for the study of ionic species in solution by means of effective two-body potentials [J]. Journal of American Chemistry Society, 2002, 124(9): 1968–1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    LI Jing-sheng, WANG Juan, SHEN Qin, ZHENG Ning-ning. Effects of shear rates on radial distribution of different types of heavy particles in light media [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Socity of China, 2008, 18(2): 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    CHEN Wen-long, HAN Xiao-jun, PENG Zhang-quan, DONG Shao-jun, WANG Er-kang. Investigation of electrochemical charging behaviors of “naked” gold nanoparticles ensembles in aqueous media [J]. Chinese Journal of Chemistry, 2002, 20(10): 1031–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    XIAO Jin, QIN Qi, WAN Ye, ZHOU Feng, CHEN Yan-bin, LI Jie, LIU Ye-xiang. Effect of anions on preparation of ultrafine α-Al2O3 powder [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2007, 14(6): 773–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    XIONG Yun, PRATSINIS S E, MASTRANGELO S V R. The effect of ionic additives on aerosol coagulation [J]. Journal of Colloid Interface Science, 1992, 153(1): 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    D’ANGELO P, BARONE V, CHILLEMI G, SANNA N, WOLFRAM M K, PAVEL N V. Hydrogen and higher shell contributions in Zn2+, Ni2+, and Co2+ aqueous solution: An X-ray absorption fine structure and molecular dynamics study [J]. Journal of American Chemistry Society, 2002, 124(9): 1958–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    PARK H, KIM S, CHANG H. Brownian dynamic simulation for the aggregation of charged particles [J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2001, 32(11): 1369–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    ADACHI M, KOUSAKA Y, OKUYAMA K. Unipolar and bipolar diffusion charging of ultrafine aerosol particles [J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 1985, 16(2): 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    COLLINS I R, TAYLOR S E. The microstructural properties of coagulated nonaqueous carbon black dispersions [J]. Journal of Colloid Interface Science, 1993, 155(2): 471–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    HARADA S, TANAKA R, NOGAMI H, SAWADA M. Dependence of fragmentation behavior of colloidal aggregates on their fractal structure [J]. Journal of Colloid Interface Science, 2006, 301(1): 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    FRANKS G V, YATES P D, LAMBERT N W A, JAMESON G J. Aggregate size and density after shearing, implications for dewatering fine tailings with hydrocyclones [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2005, 77(1): 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Central South University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing-sheng Li (李敬生)
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fei-hu Du (杜飞虎)
    • 1
  • Juan Wang (王娟)
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringJiangsu UniversityZhenjiangChina

Personalised recommendations