Advertisement

Journal of Central South University of Technology

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 774–778 | Cite as

Improvement of Prandtl mixing length theory and application in modeling of turbulent flow in circular tubes

  • Xiao Luo (罗 潇)
  • Ping-le Liu (刘平乐)Email author
  • He-an Luo (罗和安)
Article

Abstract

In order to correctly predict tube cross section time-smoothed velocity distribution, friction factor and mass transfer behavior, two models for turbulent flow in circular tubes based on classical Prandtl mixing length theory and a modified mixing length were established. The results show that the modified mixing length includes the introduction of a damping function for the viscous sublayer and the second-order derivative to approximate eddy velocity. The calculated dimensionless time-smoothed velocity from the model based on Prandtl mixing length is much better than the result from the concept of eddy viscosity. The calculated eddy viscosity from the model based on modified mixing length is much better than the result from the model based on the classical Prandtl mixing length theory. And the friction factor calculated from the model based on the modified mixing length agrees well with the reported empirical relationships.

Key words

turbulent flow Prandtl mixing length time-smoothed velocity eddy viscosity friction factor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    ZHANG Zhao-shun, CUI Gui-xiang, XU Chun-xiao. Theory and modeling of turbulence [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    HE S, JACKSON J D. A study of turbulence under condition of transient flow in a pipe [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2000, 408:1–38.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    MORSI Y S M, HOLLAND P G, CLAYTON B R. Prediction of turbulent swirling flows in axisymmetric annuli [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 1996, 19(10): 613–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    PRIYMAK V G, MIYAZAKI T. Accurate navier-stokes investigation of transitional and turbulent flows in a circular pipe [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1998, 142(2): 370–411.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    COTTON M A. Resonant response in periodic turbulent flows: Computations using a k-ɛ eddy viscosity model [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2007, 45(1): 54–61.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    CHANDESRIS M, SERRE G, SAGAUT P. A macroscopic model for flow in porous media suited for channel, pipe and rod bundle flows [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2006, 49(15/16):2739–2750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    CRUZ D O A, PINHO F T. Turbulent pipe flow predictions with a low Reynolds number k-ɛ model for drag reducing fluids [J]. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 114(2/3): 109–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    RICE M, HALL J, PADADAKIS G, YIANNESKIS M. Investigation of laminar flow in a stirred vessel at low Reynolds numbers [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2006, 61(9): 2762–2770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    FIOFFMAN J, JOHNSON C. A new approach to computational turbulence modeling [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 195(23/24): 2865–2880.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    IIZUKA S, KONDO H. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow over complex terrain using modified static eddy viscosity models [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2006, 40(5): 925–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    FRISCH U. Turbulence [M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    REICHARDT H. Complete representation of a turbulent velocity distribution in smooth tubes [J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 1951, 31(7): 208–219.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    DJORDJEVIC V D. A higher-order asymptotic theory for fully developed turbulent flow in smooth pipes [J]. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 1998, 33(3): 237–250.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    BIRD R B, STEWART W E, LIGHTFOOT E N. Transport phenomena [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    ZYABRIKOV V V, LOITSYANSKII L G. The damping factor in the theory of Prandtl mixing length [J]. Fluid Dynamics, 1987, 22(5):695–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    BRADSHAW P. Turbulence [M]. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    ABBOTT D E, WALKER J D A, YORK R E. Numerical solution of turbulent boundary layers approaching separation [C]// ROBERT D R. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1975: 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    HANNA O T, SANDALL O C, MAZET P R. Heat and mass transfer in turbulent flow under conditions of drag reduction [J]. American Institute of Chemical Engineering Journal, 1981, 27(4): 693–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    LIN C S, MOULTON R W, PUTNAM G L. Mass transfer between solid wall and fluids streams [J]. Industrial Engineering Chemistry, 1953, 45(3): 636–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    BARENBLATT G I. Scaling, self-similarity, and intermediate asymptotics [M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Central South University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiao Luo (罗 潇)
    • 1
  • Ping-le Liu (刘平乐)
    • 1
    Email author
  • He-an Luo (罗和安)
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Chemical EngineeringXiangtan UniversityXiangtanChina

Personalised recommendations