Advertisement

Homology modeling and evolutionary trace analysis of superoxide dismutase from extremophile Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans

  • Liu Yuan-dong  (刘元东)
  • Wang Hai-dong  (王海东)
  • Qiu Guan-zhou  (邱冠周)Email author
Article
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

The gene sod in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans may play a crucial role in its tolerance to the extremely acidic, toxic and oxidative environment of bioleaching. For insight into the anti-toxic mechanism of the bacteria, a three-dimensional (3D) molecular structure of the protein encoded by this gene was built by homology modeling techniques, refined by molecular dynamics simulations, assessed by PROFILE-3D and PROSTAT programs and its key residues were further detected by evolutionary trace analysis. Through these procedures, some trace residues were identified and spatially clustered. Among them, the residues of Asn38, Gly103 and Glu161 are randomly scattered throughout the mapped structure; interestingly, the other residues are all distinctly clustered in a subgroup near Fe atom. From these results, this gene can be confirmed at 3D level to encode the Fe-depending superoxide dismutase and subsequently play an anti-toxic role. Furthermore, the detected key residues around Fe binding site can be conjectured to be directly responsible for Fe binding and catalytic function.

Key words

bioleaching superoxide dismutase Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans homology modeling evolutionary trace molecular dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    RAWLINGS D E, KUSANO T. Molecular genetics of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans[J]. Microbiological Reviews, 1994, 58(1): 39–55.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    BAKER B J, BANFIELD J F. Microbial communities in acid mine drainage[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2003, 44(2): 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    TUOVINEN O H, NIEMELA S I, GYLLENBERG H G. Tolerance of Thiobacillus ferrooxidations to some metals[J]. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek(International Journal of General and Molecular Microbiology), 1971, 37(4): 489–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    BANERJEE P C. Genetics of metal resistance in acidophilic prokaryotes of acidic mine environments[J]. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 42(1): 9–25.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    QUATRINI R, APPIA-AYME C, DENIS Y, et al. Insights into the iron and sulfur energetic metabolism of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans by microarray transcriptome profiling[J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2006, 83(1/4): 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    ZELKO I N, MARIANI T J, FOLZ R J. Superoxide dismutase multigene family: a comparison of the Cu Zn-SOD (SODI), Mn-SOD (SOD2), and EC-SOD (SOD3) gene structures, evolution, and expression[J]. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 2002, 33(3): 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    BANNISTER J V, BANNISTER W H, ROTILIO G. Aspects of the structure, function, and applications of superoxide dismutase[J]. CRC Critical Reviews in Biochemistry, 1987, 22(2): 111–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    PARKER M W, BLAKE C C. Iron-and manganese-containing superoxide dismutases can be distinguished by analysis of their primary structures[J]. FEBS Letters, 1988, 229(2): 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    PARVATIYAR K E, ALSABBAGH U A, OCHSNER M A, et al. Global analysis of cellular factors and responses involved in Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance to arsenite[J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 2005, 187(14): 4853–4864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    GESLIN C, LLANOS J, PRIEUR D, et al. The manganese and iron superoxide dismutases protect Escherichia coli from heavy metal toxicity[J]. Research in Microbiology, 2001, 152(10): 901–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    BLUNDELL T L, SIBANDA B L, STERNBERG M J E, et al. Knowledge-based prediction of protein structures and the design of novel molecules[J]. Nature, 1987, 326: 347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    LIPMAN D J, PEARSON W R. Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches[J]. Science, 1985, 227: 1435–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    SALI A, POTTERTON L, YUAN F, et al. Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by MODELLER[J]. Proteins, 1995, 23(3): 318–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    PONDER J W, RICHARDS F M. Tertiary templates for proteins: Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes[J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1987, 193(4): 775–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    JORGENSEN W L, CHANDRASEKHAR J, MADURA J D, et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1983, 79(2): 926–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    LUTHY R, BOWIE J U, EISENBERG D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles[J]. Nature, 1992, 356: 83–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    MORRIS A L, MACARTHUR M W, HUTCHINSON E G, et al. Stereochemical quality of protein structure coordinates[J]. Proteins, 1992, 12(4): 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    LICHTARGE O, BOURNE H R, COHEN F E. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families[J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1996, 257(2): 342–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    HARTIGAN J A. Clustering Algorithms[M]. New York: Wiley Press, 1975.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    LIM J H, YU Y G, HAN Y S, et al. The crystal structure of an Fe-superoxide dismutase from the hyperthermophile Aquifex pyrophilus at 1.9 Å resolution: Structural basis for thermostability[J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1997, 270(2): 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    HATCHIKIAN E C, HENRY Y A. An iron-containing superoxide dismutase from the strict anaerobe Desulfovibrio desulfuricans[J]. Biochimie, 1977, 59(2): 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Central South University Press, Sole distributor outside Mainland China: Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liu Yuan-dong  (刘元东)
    • 1
  • Wang Hai-dong  (王海东)
    • 1
  • Qiu Guan-zhou  (邱冠周)
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Resources Processing and BioengineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations