Advertisement

A framework for end-to-end RSVP context transfer in mobile IPv6

  • Liu Chu-da Email author
  • Qian De-pei 
  • Liu Yi 
  • Li Yan-ping 
  • Xiao Kai-ping 
Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

A framework for end-to-end RSVP context transfer in Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) based on the architecture of F-HMIPv6 is proposed in this paper. The scheme provides an end-to-end RSVP context transfer for real-time applications to overcome the weakness of Context Transfer Protocol which can not meet the need of end-to-end QoS mechanisms because contexts are only transferred between Access Routers (ARs), therefore they can promptly get the same forwarding process, minimize the handover service disruption, and avoid initiating the end-to-end RSVP signaling from scratch after an MN performs handovers. It may also reduce the signaling overhead and handover latencies by adopting the F-HMIPv6architecture. The performance of the approach is compared with the re-initiating RSVP signaling to re-establish QoS states using network simulator, and the numerical results show that the scheme has the less latency and packet loss than that of the re-initiating approach.

Key words

RSVP context transfer F-HMIPv6 mobile IPv6 

CLC number

TP391 TP393 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Johnson D, Perkins C, Arkko J. Mobility Support in IPv6 [EB/OL]. http://www. ietf. org/rfc/rfc3775.txt, June 2004.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Braden R, Clark D, Shenker S. Integrated services in the Internet architecture: an overview [EB/OL]. http://www. ietf. org/rfc/rfc1633. txt, June 1994.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Braden R, Zhang L, Berson S, et al. Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP)-Version 1 Functional Specification [EB/OL]. http://www. ietf. org/rfc/rfc2205. txt, September 1997.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Blake S, Black D, Carlson M, et al. An architecture for differentiated services [EB/OL]. http://www. ietf. org/rfc/rfc2475. txt, December 1998.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Talukdar A K, Badrinath B R, Acharya A. MRSVP: A Resource Reservation Protocol for An Integrated Services Network with Mobile Hosts [J]. Wireless Networks, 2001, 7(1): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Paskalis S, Kaloxylos A, Zervas E, et al. RSVP Mobility Proxy[EB/OL]. http://www. watersprings. org/pub/id/draft-paskalis-rsvpmp-00. txt, December 2001.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Shen Q, Seah W, Lo A, et al. Mobility Extensions to RSVP in an RSVP-Mobile IPv6 Framework[EB/OL]. http://www. watersprings. org/pub/id/draft-shennsis-rsvp-mobileipv6-00. txt, July 2002.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Yasukawa S, Nishikido J, Hisashi K. Scalable Mobility and QoS Support Mechanism for IPv6-based Realtime Wireless Internet Traffic [A]. Globecom 2001 [C]. IEEE Communications Society, November, 2001, 3459–3462.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Chaskar H, Koodli R. A Framework for QoS Support in Mobile IPv6[EB/OL]. http://quimby. gnus. org/internet-drafts/draft-chaskar-mobileip-qos-01. txt, 2001 – 03.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Kempf J, (Ed.). Problem Description: Reasons for Performing Context Transfers [EB/OL]. http://www. ietf. org/rfc/rfc3374. txt, September, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Jung Hee Young, Koh Seok Joo, Soliman H, et al. Fast Handover for Hierarchical MIPv6[EB/OL]. http://www. join. uni-muenster. de/Dokumente/drafts/draft-jung-mobileip-fastho-hmipv6-02. txt, August 2003.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Koodli R. Fast Handovers for Mobile IPv6[EB/OL]. http://www. ietf. org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mobileip-fast-mipv6-08. txt, October 2003.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Soliman H, Castelluccia C, El-Malki K, et al. Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 mobility management [EB/OL]. http://www. ietf. org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mobileip-hmipv6-08. txt, June, 2003.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Loughney J, Nakhjiri M, Perkins C, et al. Context Transfer Protocol [EB/OL]. http://ietfreport. isoc. org/all-ids/draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-09. txt, April 14, 2004.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Festag A, Fu X, Karl H, et al. QoS-Conditionalized Binding Update in Mobile IPv6[EB/OL]. http://user. informatik. uni-goettingen. de/∼ fu/paper/drafttkn-mobileip-qosbinding-mipv6-00. txt, July 2001.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Chaskar H, Koodli R. A Framework for QoS Support in Mobile IPv6[EB/OL]. http://quimby. gnus. org/internet-drafts/draft-chaskar-mobileip-qos-01. txt, March 2001.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    The Network Simulator NS2 [EB/OL]. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    The ns wireless extension module[EB/OL]. http://icapeople. epfl. ch/widmer/uwb/ns-2/noah/.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Greis M. RSVP/ns: an Implementation of RSVP for the Network Simulator ns-2[R]. University of Bohn, 1999.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hsieh R, Seneviratne A, Soliman H, et al. Performance analysis on Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 with Fasthandoff over End-to-End TCP [A]. Globecom 2002 [C]. IEEE Communications Society, Taipei, 2002, 2488–2492.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Central South University 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liu Chu-da 
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Qian De-pei 
    • 1
    • 3
  • Liu Yi 
    • 1
  • Li Yan-ping 
    • 1
  • Xiao Kai-ping 
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Changsha Aeronautical Vocation Technical CollegeChangshaChina
  3. 3.School of ComputerBeihang UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations