Advertisement

Ecological Offsetting in China’s Coastal Wetlands: Existing Challenges and Strategies for Future Improvement

  • Shuling Yu
  • Baoshan CuiEmail author
  • Chengjie Xie
  • Xu Ma
  • Ying Man
  • Zhonghua Ning
Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Land-use changes in coastal wetlands have led to a worldwide degradation of marine coastal ecosystems and a loss of the ecological services they provide. Ecological offsetting is a popular strategy and an effective mitigation measure for ecosystems that have been degraded, damaged, or destroyed and is critical for habitats where natural recovery is hindered. However, the current understanding of the theory and practice of ecological offsetting for coastal wetlands is extremely limited in many developing countries. We conducted a review of ecological offsetting for coastal wetlands projects and studies in China in 1979–2017 to explore the application and limitations of ecological offsetting theory. It was found that China’s coastal ecological offsetting regime has recently entered a rapidly developing stage, with an increasing number of different types of offsetting projects conducted, but theoretical research lags behind practical applications. Considerable governmental, social, technological and ethical challenges remain to resolve. Coastal ecological offsetting schemes have been inconsistent in meeting conservation objectives or preventing net losses because of the challenges of ensuring they are fully consistent in practice (mainly in-kind offsets) and theory (mainly out-of-kind offsets). Ecological offsetting projects were primarily implemented by government, developers, and non-profit organizations. The available funding of coastal ecological offsetting projects is insufficient, which makes ecological offsetting a risky operation. Therefore, we propose strategies for improvement that integrate the consideration of theoretical and practical challenges in the offsetting process, while providing a scientific basis and directional guidance for the future practice of biodiversity conservation and environmental management.

Keywords

ecological offsetting biodiversity offset coastal wetlands no net loss mitigation restoration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ali M, Kennedy C M, Kiesecker J et al., 2018. Integrating biodiversity offsets within Circular Economy policy in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185: 32–43. doi: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2018.03.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbier E B, Hacker S D, Kennedy C et al., 2011. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs, 81(2): 169–193. doi: 10.1890/10-1510.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barter M, 2002. Shorebirds of the Yellow Sea: Importance, Threats and Conservation Status. Canberra, Australia: Wetlands International, Oceania.Google Scholar
  4. Bayraktarov E, Saunders M I, Abdullah S et al., 2016. The cost and feasibility of marine coastal restoration. Ecological Applications, 26(4): 1055–1074. doi: 10.1890/15-1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bottrill M C, Walsh J C, Watson J E M et al., 2011. Does recovery planning improve the status of threatened species? Biological Conservation, 144(5): 1595–1601. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011. 02.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bull J W, Suttle K B, Gordon A et al., 2013. Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice. Oryx, 47(3): 369–380. doi: 10. 1017/S003060531200172XGoogle Scholar
  7. Bull J W, Gordon A, Watson J E M et al., 2016. Seeking convergence on the key concepts in ‘no net loss’ policy. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53(6): 1686–1693. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cao W Z, Wong M H, 2007. Current status of coastal zone issues and management in China: a review. Environment International, 33(7): 985–992. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2007.04.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bai Q Q, Chen J Z et al., 2015. Identification of coastal wetlands of international importance for waterbirds: a review of China Coastal Waterbird Surveys 2005–2013. Avian Research, 6(1): 12. doi: 10.1186/s 40657-015-0021-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chalmers D, 2015. Biobanking and privacy laws in Australia. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(4): 703–713. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12313Google Scholar
  11. Cui Baoshan, Xie Tian, Wang Qing et al., 2017. Impact of large-scale reclamation on coastal wetlands and implications for ecological restoration, compensation, and sustainable exploitation framework. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32(4): 418–425. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Curran M, Hellweg S, Beck J, 2014. Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy? Ecological Applications, 24(4): 617–632. doi: 10.1890/13-0243.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Favaro B, Olszynski M, 2017. Authorized net losses of fish habitat demonstrate need for improved habitat protection in Canada. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 74(3): 285–291. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2016-0480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibbons P, Evans M C, Maron M et al., 2016. A loss-gain calculator for biodiversity offsets and the circumstances in which no net loss is feasible. Conservation Letters, 9(4): 252–259. doi: 10.1111/conl.12206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gong Peng, Niu Zhenguo, Cheng Xiao et al., 2010. China’s wetland change (1990–2000) determined by remote sensing. Science China Earth Sciences, 53(7): 1036–1042. doi: 10.1007/s 11430-010-4002-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. He Q, Bertness M D, Bruno J F et al., 2014. Economic development and coastal ecosystem change in China. Scientific Reports, 4: 5995. doi: 10.1038/srep05995Google Scholar
  17. Hockings M, Stolton S, Leverington F et al., 2006. Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing Management Effectiveness of Protected Areas. 2nd ed. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hough P, Robertson M, 2009. Mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: where it comes from, what it means. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 17(1): 15–33. doi: 10.1007/s 11273-008-9093-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Joseph L N, Maloney R F, Possingham H P, 2009. Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol. Conservation Biology, 23(2): 328–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01124.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Justus J, Colyvan M, Regan H et al., 2009. Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental value. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(4): 187–191. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levrel H, Scemama P, Vaissière A C, 2017. Should we be wary of mitigation banking? Evidence regarding the risks associated with this wetland offset arrangement in Florida. Ecological Economics, 135: 136–149. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12. 025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu Baiqiao, Meng Weiqing, Zhao Jianhua et al., 2015. Variation of coastline resources utilization in China from 1990 to 2013. Journal of Natural Resources, 30(12): 2033–2044. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. Liu Z Z, Cui B S, He Q, 2016. Shifting paradigms in coastal restoration: six decades’ lessons from China. Science of the Total Environment, 566–567: 205–214. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2016.05.049Google Scholar
  24. MacKinnon J, Verkuil Y I, Murray N J, 2012. IUCN situation analysis on East and Southeast Asian intertidal habitats, with particular reference to the Yellow Sea (including the Bohai Sea). Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.Google Scholar
  25. Maron M, Hobbs R J, Moilanen A et al., 2012. Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biological Conservation, 155: 141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maron M, Ives C D, Kujala H et al., 2016. Taming a wicked problem: resolving controversies in biodiversity offsetting. BioScience, 66(6): 489–498. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maron M, Brownlie S, Bull J W et al., 2018. The many meanings of no net loss in environmental policy. Nature Sustainability, 1(1): 19–27. doi: 10.1038/s41893-017-0007-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGillivray D, 2012. Compensating biodiversity loss: the EU Commission’s approach to compensation under Article 6 of the Habitats Directive. Journal of Environmental Law, 24(3): 417–450. doi: 10.1093/jel/eqs007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meng W Q, Hu B B, He M X et al., 2017. Temporal-spatial variations and driving factors analysis of coastal reclamation in China. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 191: 39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.04.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moilanen A, van Teeffelen A J A, Ben-Haim Y et al., 2009. How much compensation is enough? A framework for incorporating uncertainty and time discounting when calculating offset ratios for impacted habitat. Restoration Ecology, 17(4): 470–478. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00382.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Murray N J, Clemens R S, Phinn S R et al., 2014. Tracking the rapid loss of tidal wetlands in the Yellow Sea. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(5): 267–272. doi: 10.1890/130260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quétier F, Lavorel S, 2011. Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: key issues and solutions. Biological Conservation, 144(12): 2991–2999. doi: 10.1016/j. biocon.2011.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Quigley J T, Harper D J, 2006. Compliance with Canada’s Fisheries Act: a field audit of habitat compensation projects. Environmental Management, 37(3): 336–350. doi: 10.1007/s 00267-004-0262-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. SFA (State Forestry Administry), 2003. The Investigation of Wetland Resources in China. Available at https://doi.org/xzsp.forestry.gov.cn/. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. SFA (State Forestry Administry), 2014. The Second Investigation of Wetland Resources in China. Available at https://doi.org/xzsp.forestry.gov.cn/. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  36. Stroud D A, Baker A, Blanco D E et al., 2008. The conservation and population status of the world’s waders at the turn of the millennium. In: Boere G C, Galbraith C A, Stroud D A (eds). Waterbirds Around the World. Edinburgh, UK: The Stationary Office, 643–648.Google Scholar
  37. Sullivan S, Hannis M, 2015. Nets and frames, losses and gains: value struggles in engagements with biodiversity offsetting policy in England. Ecosystem Services, 15: 162–173. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sun Z G, Sun W G, Tong C et al., 2015. China’s coastal wetlands: conservation history, implementation efforts, existing issues and strategies for future improvement. Environment International, 79: 25–41. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ten Kate K, Bishop J, Bayon R, 2004. Biodiversity offsets: views, experience, and the business case. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  40. Wang Y X, Yao Y, Ju M T, 2008. Wise use of wetlands: current state of protection and utilization of Chinese wetlands and recommendations for improvement. Environmental Management, 41(6): 793–808. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9072-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yu S L, Cui B S, Gibbons P et al., 2017. Towards a biodiversity offsetting approach for coastal land reclamation: coastal management implications. Biological Conservation, 214: 35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yu S, Cui B, Gibbons P, 2018. A method for identifying suitable biodiversity offset sites and its application to reclamation of coastal wetlands in China. Biological Conservation, 227: 284–291. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press and Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuling Yu
    • 1
  • Baoshan Cui
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chengjie Xie
    • 1
  • Xu Ma
    • 1
  • Ying Man
    • 1
  • Zhonghua Ning
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of EnvironmentBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations