Chinese Geographical Science

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 289–297 | Cite as

Biomass carbon sequestration by planted forests in China

  • Xinliang XuEmail author
  • Kerang Li


The planted forest area and carbon sequestration have increased significantly in China, because of large-scale reforestation and afforestation in the past decades. In this study, we developed an age-based volume-to-biomass method to estimate the carbon storage by planted forests in China in the period of 1973–2003 based on the data from 1209 field plots and national forest inventories. The results show that the total carbon storage of planted forests was 0.7743 Pg C in 1999–2003, increased by 3.08 times since the early 1970s. The carbon density of planted forests varied from 10.6594 Mg/ha to 23.9760 Mg/ha and increased by 13.3166 Mg/ha from 1973–1976 to 1999–2003. Since the early 1970s, the planted forests in China have been always a carbon sink, and the annual rate of carbon sequestration was 0.0217 Pg C/yr. The carbon storage and densities of planted forests varied greatly in space and time. The carbon storage of Middle South China was in the lead in all regions, which accounted for 23%–36% of national carbon storage. While higher C densities (from 17.79 Mg/ha to 26.05 Mg/ha) were usually found in Northeast China. The planted forests in China potentially have a high carbon sequestration since a large part of them are becoming mature and afforestation continues to grow.


planted forest forest inventory carbon storage carbon density carbon sequestration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allan T, Lanly J P, 1991. Overview of status and trends of world forests. In: Howlett D et al. (eds.). Technical Workshop to Explore Options for Global Forestry Management. London: International Institute for Environment and Development, 17–39.Google Scholar
  2. Brown S, Lugo A E, 1984. Biomass of tropical forests: A new estimate based on forest volumes. Science, 223(4642): 1290–1293. DOI: 10.1126/science.223.4642.1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown S, Gillespie A J R, Lugo A E, 1989. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science, 35(4): 881–902.Google Scholar
  4. Brown S, Schroeder P, Birdsey R, 1997. Aboveground biomass distribution of US eastern hardwood forests and the use of large trees as an indicator of forest development. Forest Ecology and Management, 96(1–2): 37–47. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00044-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown S L, Schroeder P E, 1999a. Spatial patterns of aboveground production and mortality of wood biomass for eastern U.S. Forests Ecological Applications, 9(3): 968–980. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0968:SPOAPA]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
  6. Brown S L, Schroeder P Kern J F, 1999b. Spatial distribution of biomass in forests of the eastern USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 123(1): 81–90. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99) 00017-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CMF (Chinese Ministry of Forestry), 1977. Forest Resource Statistics of China (1973–1976). Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishers. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. CMF (Chinese Ministry of Forestry), 1982. Forest Resource Statistics of China (1977–1981). Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishers. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. CMF (Chinese Ministry of Forestry), 1989. Forest Resource Statistics of China (1984–1988). Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishers. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. CMF (Chinese Ministry of Forestry), 1994. Forest Resource Statistics of China (1989–1993). Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishers. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. CMF (Chinese Ministry of Forestry), 2000. Forest Resource Statistics of China (1994–1998). Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishers. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. CMF (Chinese Ministry of Forestry), 2005. Forest Resource Statistics of China (1999–2003). Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishers. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Dixon R K, Brown S, Houghton T A et al., 1994. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 263(5144): 185–190. DOI: 10.1126/science.263.5144.185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Erkki Tomppo, 2000. National forest inventory of Finland and its role estimating the carbon balance of forests. Biotechnology Agronomy Society and Environment, 4(4): 281–284.Google Scholar
  15. Fang J, Wang G, Liu G et al., 1998. Forest biomass of China: An estimate based on the biomass-volume relationship. Ecological Applications, 8(4): 1084–1091. DOI: 10.1890/10-51-0761(1998) 008[1084:FBOCAE]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
  16. Fang J Y, Chen A P, Peng C H et al., 2001. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science, 292(5525): 2320–2322. DOI: 10.1126/science.1058-629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fang Jingyun, Liu Guohua, Xu Songling, 1996. Biomass and net production of forest vegetation in China. ACTA Ecologica Sinica, 16(5): 497–508. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Goodale C L, Apps M J, Birdsey R A et al., 2002. Forest carbon sinks in the Northern Hemisphere. Ecological Applications, 12(3): 891–899. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0891: FCSITN]2.0.CO; 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Helene A de Wit, Taru Palosuo, Gro Hylen et al., 2006. A carbon budget of forest biomass and soils in southeast Norway calculated using a widely applicable method. Forest Ecology and Management, 225(1–3): 15–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005. 12.023Google Scholar
  20. Houghton R A, Hackler J L, Lawrence K T, 1999. The US carbon budget: Contributions from land-use change. Science 285(5427): 574–578. DOI: 10.1126/science.285.5427.574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kauppi P E, Mielikäinen K, Kuusela K, 1992. Biomass and carbon budget of European forests 1971–1990. Science, 256(5053): 70–74. DOI: 10.1126/science.256.5053.70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lehtonena A, Makipaa R, Heikkinenb J et al., 2004. Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 188(1–3): 211–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco. 2003.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu Guohua, Fu Bojie, Fang Jingyun, 2000. Carbon dynamics of Chinese forests and its contribution to global carbon balance. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 20(5): 733–740. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. Liu Jiyuan, 1996. A Macro Inventory of China’s Environments and Resources and Their Dynamics. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. Luo Tianxiang, 1996. The Distribution Patterns and Modeling of Biomass and Net Primary Production in China Main Forests. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Neth Top, Nobuya Mizoue, Shigetaka Kai, 2004. Estimating forest biomass increment based on permanent sample plots in relation to woodfuel consumption: A case study in Kampong Thom Province, Cambodia. Journal of Forest Research, 9(2): 117–123. DOI: 10.1007/s10310-003-0064-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ni Jian, 2003. Net primary productivity in forests of China: Scaling-up of national inventory data and comparison with model predictions. Forest Ecology and Management, 176(1–3): 485–495. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00312-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ni Jian, Zhang Xinshi, Scurlockc J M O, 2001. Synthesis and analysis of biomass and net primary productivity in Chinese forests. Annals of Forest Science, 58: 351–384. DOI: 10.10-51/forest: 2001131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pan Y, Luo T, Birdsey R et al., 2004. New estimates of carbon storage and sequestration in China’s forests: Effects of age-class and method on inventory-based carbon estimation. Climatic Change, 67(2–3): 211–236. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-004-2799-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schroeder P, Brown S, Mo J et al., 1997. Biomass estimation for temperate broadleaf forests of the United States using inventory data. Forest Science, 43(3): 424–434.Google Scholar
  31. Schulze E D, Wirth C, Heimann M, 2000. Climate change: Managing forests after Kyoto. Science, 289(5487): 2058–2059. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5487.2058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shi Jun, 2005. Study on the effect of afforestation on carbon cycle in Chinese terrestrial ecosystem. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. Winjum Jack K, Paul E Schroeder, 1997. Forest plantations of the world: Their extent, ecological attributes, and carbon storage. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 84(1–2): 153–167. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1923(96)02383-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. WRI (World Resources Institute), 1992. World Resources 1992–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Zhang P C, Shao G. F, Zhao G et al., 2000. China’s forest policy for the 21st century. Science, 288(5474): 2135–2136. DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5474.2135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang X Q, Xu D, 2003. Potential carbon sequestration in China’s forests. Environmental Science & Policy, 6(5): 421–432. DOI: 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00072-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao M, Zhou G, 2005. Estimation of biomass and net primary productivity of major planted forests in China based on forest inventory data. Forest Ecology and Management, 207(3): 295–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou G, Wang Y, Jiang Y et al., 2002. Estimating biomass and net primary production from forest inventory data—A case study of China’s Larix forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 169(1–2): 149–157. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00-305-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS and Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations