Advertisement

Control Theory and Technology

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 382–392 | Cite as

Robust control for electric vehicle powertrains

  • Johannes BuergerEmail author
  • James Anderson
Article
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

This paper considers the application of robust control methods (μ- and H-synthesis) to the speed and acceleration control problem encountered in electric vehicle powertrains. To this end, we consider a two degree of freedom control structure with a reference model. The underlying powertrain model is derived and combined into the corresponding interconnected system required for μ- and H-synthesis. The closed-loop performance of the resulting controllers are compared in a detailed simulation analysis that includes nonlinear effects. It is observed that the μ-controller offers performance advantages in particular for the acceleration control problem, but at the price of a high-order controller.

Keywords

Automotive control electric vehicle powertrains robust control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    U. Kiencke, L. Nielsen. Automotive Control Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Thomsen, N. Hoffmann, F. Fuchs. PI control, PI-based state space control, and model-based predictive control for drive systems with elastically coupled loads - a comparative study. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2011, 58(8): 3647–3657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. Lefebvre, P. Chevrel, S. Richard. An H-infinity-based control design methodology dedicated to the active control of vehicle longitudinal oscillations. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2003, 11(6): 948–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    B. Alt, F. Antritter, F. Svaricek, et al. Two degree of freedom structure for reduction of driveline oscillations. Autoreg, Baden-Baden, 2011: 361–374 (in German).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. Bruce, B. Egardt, S. Pettersson. On powertrain oscillation damping using feedforward and LQ feedback control. IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Toronto: IEEE, 2005: 1415–1420.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    U. Angeringer, M. Horn. Sliding mode drive line control for an electrically driven vehicle. IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Denver: IEEE, 2011: 521–526.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. Caruntu, A. Balau, M. Lazar, et al. Driveline oscillations damping: A tractable predictive control solution based on a piecewise affine model. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems, 2016, 19: 168–185.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. Guanetti, F. Borrelli. Stochastic MPC for cloud-aided suspension control. IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control, Melbourne: IEEE, 2017: 238–243.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. Banjac, B. Stellato, N. Moehle, et al. Embedded code generation using the OSQP solver. IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control, Melbourne: IEEE, 2017: 1906–1911.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Wang, H. Zhang, J. Wang. Linear parametervarying controller design for four-wheel independently actuated electric ground vehicles with active steering systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2014, 22(4): 1281–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. Limebeer, E. Kasenally, J. Perkins. On the design of robust two degree of freedom controllers. Automatica, 1993, 29(1): 157–168.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. Skogestad, I. Postlethwaite. Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design. New York: Wiley, 2005.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    K. Zhou, J. C. Doyle, K. Glover. Robust and Optimal Control. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1996.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Packard, J. C. Doyle. The complex structured singular value. Automatica, 1993, 29(1): 71–109.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Robust Control Toolbox for MATLAB V2015a: https://ww2.mathworks.cn/products/robust.html.
  16. [16]
    M. Nordin, P. Gutman. Controlling mechanical systems with backlash-a survey. Automatica, 2002, 38(10): 1633–1649.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© South China University of Technology, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BMW GroupMunichGermany
  2. 2.Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciencesthe California Institute of TechnologyPasadenaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations