Skip to main content
Log in

2D-3D registration for 3D analysis of lower limb alignment in a weight-bearing condition

  • Published:
Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

X-ray imaging is the conventional method for diagnosing the orthopedic condition of a patient. Computerized Tomography(CT) scanning is another diagnostic method that provides patient’s 3D anatomical information. However, both methods have limitations when diagnosing the whole leg; X-ray imaging does not provide 3D information, and normal CT scanning cannot be performed with a standing posture. Obtaining 3D data regarding the whole leg in a standing posture is clinically important because it enables 3D analysis in the weight bearing condition. Based on these clinical needs, a hardware-based bi-plane X-ray imaging system has been developed; it uses two orthogonal X-ray images. However, such methods have not been made available in general clinics because of the hight cost. Therefore, we proposed a widely adaptive method for 2D X-ray image and 3D CT scan data. By this method, it is possible to threedimensionally analyze the whole leg in standing posture. The optimal position that generates the most similar image is the captured X-ray image. The algorithm verifies the similarity using the performance of the proposed method by simulation-based experiments. Then, we analyzed the internal-external rotation angle of the femur using real patient data. Approximately 10.55 degrees of internal rotations were found relative to the defined anterior-posterior direction. In this paper, we present a useful registration method using the conventional X-ray image and 3D CT scan data to analyze the whole leg in the weight-bearing condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tracy Aldridge. Diagnosing heel pain in adults, Am Fam Physician, 2004, 70: 332–342.

  2. Robert L Barrack, Tim Schrader, Alexander J Bertot et al. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat R, 2001, 392: 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stephen P Brooks, Byron JT Morgan. Optimization using simulated annealing, J Roy Statist Soc Ser D, 1995, 44(2): 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wenli Cai, Georgios Sakas. Transfer functions in DRR volume rendering, In: Proceedings of the 13th International Congress and Exhibition Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. John Canny. A computational approach to edge detection, IEEE T Pattern Anal, 1986, 6: 679–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guillaume Dubois, Dominique Bonneau, Virginie Lafage et al. Reliable femoral frame construction based on MRI dedicated to muscles position follow-up, Med Biol Eng Comput, 2015, 53(10): 921–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frederik Gelaude, Jos Vander Sloten, Bert Lauwers. Accuracy assessment of CT-based outer surface femur meshes, Comput Aided Surg, 2008, 13(4): 188–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jerome Hausselle, Ayman Assi, Amine El Helou et al. Subject-specific musculoskeletal model of the lower limb in a lying and standing position, Comput Method Biomec, 2014, 17(5): 480–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karl Heinz Höhne, Michael Bomans, Andreas Pommert et al. 3D visualization of tomographic volume data using the generalized voxel model, Visual Comput, 1990, 6(1): 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Amir A Jamali, Christopher Deuel, Aimee Perreira et al. Linear and angular measurements of computer-generated models: are they accurate, valid, and reliable?, Comput Aided Surg, 2007, 12(5): 278–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hans J Johnson, Matthew M McCormick, Luis Ibanez. The ITK Software Guide Book 2: Design and Functionality Fourth Edition Updated for ITK Version 4.7, Kitware, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Youngjun Kim, Kang-Il Kim, Jin Hyeok Choi et al. Novel methods for 3D postoperative analysis of total knee arthroplasty using 2D–3D image registration, Clin Biomech, 2011, 26(4): 384–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ros Wade, Huiqin Yang, Claire McKenna et al. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system, Eur Spine J, 2013, 22(2): 296–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lance Williams. Casting curved shadows on curved surfaces, In: ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 1978, 12(3): 270–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lilla Zöllei, Eric Grimson, Alexander Norbash et al. 2D-3D rigid registration of X-ray fluoroscopy and CT images using mutual information and sparsely sampled histogram estimators, In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2001, 2: II-696.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youngjun Kim.

Additional information

Supported by the KIST institutional program (2E26880, 2E26276).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shim, E., Kim, Y., Lee, D. et al. 2D-3D registration for 3D analysis of lower limb alignment in a weight-bearing condition. Appl. Math. J. Chin. Univ. 33, 59–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-018-3459-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-018-3459-2

Keywords

MR Subject Classification

Navigation