Talking about sexual health during survivorship: understanding what shapes breast cancer survivors’ willingness to communicate with providers
- 47 Downloads
Breast cancer survivor (BCS)–provider communication about sexual health (SH) is often absent or inadequate. Patients report wanting providers to broach the topic, but providers cite barriers to initiating discussions. While the health care community works to address barriers, it is unrealistic to rely solely on provider initiation of SH conversations. This research investigates willingness to communicate about sexual health (WTCSH) to better understand what may interfere with survivors’ ability to self-advocate and receive care for these concerns.
(N = 305) BCSs completed online surveys. Hierarchical multiple regression determined the relationship between Sexual Quality of Life—Female (SQOL—F), which measures psychological and social dimensions of SH and WTCSH. Interviews were then conducted with forty BCSs. The constant comparative method was used to thematically analyze the transcripts.
The mean SQOL score was 53.4 out of 100. No statistically significant differences in SQOL or WTCSH were found by age or survivorship length. The positive relationship between WTCSH and SQOL was significant, F (6,266) = 4.92, p < .000, adj. R2 = .080). Five themes illustrated factors that shape WTCSH: (1) comfort discussing SH; (2) perception of demographic similarity/discordance; (3) patient-centered communication; (4) belief that SH is (un)treatable, and (5) ability to access timely/coordinated care.
Findings establish the significance of SH concerns and provide an in-depth understanding of intrapersonal, interpersonal, and organizational issues informing WTCSH.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Age and gender dynamics, perceptions of provider SQOL messaging, and futility influence survivor openness. Addressing these areas may encourage disclosure among women who would otherwise continue to suffer in silence.
KeywordsBreast cancer Survivorship Patient-provider communication Sexual health Oncology
The authors would like to thank the women who participated in this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Views expressed within this publication do not represent those of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, or the US Government, the Department of Defense at large.
- 4.World Health Organization. Sexual health. 2008. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/gender/sexualhealth.html.
- 8.Oktay JS, Walter CA. Breast cancer in the life course: women’s experiences. New York: Springer; 1991.Google Scholar
- 9.Wenzel L, Dogan-Ates A, Habbal R, et al. Defining and measuring reproductive concerns of female cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;94.Google Scholar
- 29.Wright KB, Frey LR. Communication and care in an acute cancer center: the effects of patients’ willingness to communicate about health, health-care environment perceptions, and health status on information seeking, participation in care practices, and satisfaction. Health Commun. 2008;23:369–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2009.Google Scholar
- 32.Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co; 1967.Google Scholar
- 34.American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2013.Google Scholar
- 37.Cline RJ. Everyday interpersonal communication and health. In: Thompson TL, Dorsey AM, Miller KI, Parrott R, editors. Handbook of health communication. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2003. p. 285–313.Google Scholar
- 42.Malhotra J, Rotter D, Tsui J, Llanos AAM, Balasubramanian BA, Demissie K. Impact of patient-provider race, ethnicity, and gender concordance on cancer screening: Findings from medical expenditure panel survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(12):1804–11. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0660.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar