Breast cancer survivors’ preferences for mHealth physical activity interventions: findings from a mixed methods study
- 312 Downloads
Despite the benefits of physical activity for breast cancer survivors, the majority remain insufficiently active. Mobile health (mHealth) physical activity interventions may be a more scalable strategy to increase activity among survivors. However, little is known about their preferences for mHealth intervention features. This study explored survivors’ preferences for these features.
Survivors (N = 96; Mage = 55.8 (SD = 10.2)) self-reported demographic and disease characteristics, physical activity. A subset (n = 28) completed a semi-structured phone interview. Transcribed interviews were evaluated using a thematic content analysis approach and consensus review. Following interviews, the full sample self-reported interests and preferences for intervention features via online questionnaires. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Five themes emerged from interview data: (1) importance of relevance to breast cancer survivors; (2) easy to use; (3) integration with wearable activity trackers; (4) provide sense of accomplishment; and (5) variability in desired level of structure and personalization. The highest ranked intervention features were: daily and weekly progress feedback (87.5%), newsfeed (86.6%), activity challenges (81.3%), and scheduling tool (79.2%). Survivors were interested in receiving progress feedback (80.2%) and motivational (78.1%) and reminder (75.0%) messages.
Breast cancer survivors are interested in mHealth physical activity promotion interventions, but preferences varied around themes of relevance, ease of use, and enhancing personal motivation.
Implications for cancer survivors
Engaging survivors in developing and implementing remotely delivered mHealth activity promotion interventions may enhance their effectiveness.
KeywordsPhysical activity Exercise Technology Breast cancer survivors mHealth Mixed methods
This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute [K07CA196840] and an award from the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University awarded to Siobhan Phillips. The Lurie Cancer Center is supported in part by a NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA060553. Whitney Welch and Kara Gavin are supported by NCI training grant CA193913 (PI: Bonnie Spring and Frank Penedo). We would like to thank Gillian Lloyd and Magaret Moran for their help with interview transcript coding.
This study was funded by the National Cancer Institute (K07CA196840 and CA193913) and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center which is supported in part by a NCI Cancer Center Support Grant #P30CA060553.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board at Northwestern University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.Brenner DR, Neilson HK, Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM. Physical activity after breast cancer: effect on survival and patient-reported outcomes. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2014:1–12.Google Scholar
- 16.Igwebuike LT, Zhang X, Brown JC, Schmitz KH. Applying pre-participation exercise screening to breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study. Supp Care Cancer. 2017:1–7.Google Scholar
- 17.Pew Research Cener. The best (and worst) of mobile connectivity. http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/11/30/the-best-and-worst-of-mobile-connectivity-2/
- 18.Pew Research Center. U.S. smartphone use in 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/
- 22.Coughlin SS, Whitehead M, Sheats JQ, et al. A review of smartphone applications for promoting physical activity. Jacobs J Community Med. 2016;2(1).Google Scholar
- 24.Nguyen NH, Hadgraft NT, Moore MM, et al. A qualitative evaluation of breast cancer survivors’ acceptance of and preferences for consumer wearable technology activity trackers. Supp Care Cancer. 2017:1–10.Google Scholar
- 29.Hartman SJ, Nelson SH, Myers E, Natarajan L, Sears DD, Palmer BW, et al. Randomized controlled trial of increasing physical activity on objectively measured and self-reported cognitive functioning among breast cancer survivors: the memory & motion study. Cancer. 2018;124:192–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Alfano CM, Bluethmann SM, Tesauro G, et al. NCI funding trends and priorities in physical activity and energy balance research among cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;108.Google Scholar
- 33.Lloyd GR, Hoffman SA, Welch WA, et al. Breast cancer survivors’ preferences for social support features in technology-supported physical activity interventions: findings from a mixed methods evaluation. Tranls Behav Med. 2018.Google Scholar
- 34.IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0 In. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. 2010.Google Scholar
- 35.Glaser BG, Strauss AL. Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Routledge; 1999.Google Scholar
- 36.Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Washington, D.C.: Sage Publications; 1998.Google Scholar
- 37.Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanhan: Rowman & Littlefield; 2018.Google Scholar
- 38.Cresswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Washington, D.C.: Sage Publications; 1998.Google Scholar
- 39.NVivo qualitative data analysis software. In 11 Edition. QSR International Pty Ltd. 2015.Google Scholar