Employment implications of informal cancer caregiving
- 562 Downloads
Previous research describing how informal cancer caregiving impacts employment has been conducted in small samples or a single disease site. This paper provides population-based estimates of the effect of informal cancer caregiving on employment and characterizes employment changes made by caregivers.
The samples included cancer survivors with a friend or family caregiver, participating in either the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Experiences with Cancer Survivorship Survey (ECSS) (n = 458) or the LIVESTRONG 2012 Survey for People Affected by Cancer (SPAC) (n = 4706). Descriptive statistics characterized the sample of survivors and their caregivers’ employment changes. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of caregivers’ extended employment changes, comprising time off and changes to hours, duties, or employment status.
Among survivors with an informal caregiver, 25 % from the ECSS and 29 % from the SPAC reported that their caregivers made extended employment changes. Approximately 8 % of survivors had caregivers who took time off from work lasting ≥2 months. Caregivers who made extended employment changes were more likely to care for survivors: treated with chemotherapy or transplant; closer to diagnosis or end of treatment; who experienced functional limitations; and made work changes due to cancer themselves compared to caregivers who did not make extended employment changes.
Many informal cancer caregivers make employment changes to provide care during survivors’ treatment and recovery.
Implications for cancer survivors
This study describes cancer caregiving in a prevalent sample of cancer survivors, thereby reflecting the experiences of individuals with many different cancer types and places in the cancer treatment trajectory.
KeywordsNeoplasms Caregivers Employment Cost-of-illness Quality of life
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the American Cancer Society.
Compliance with ethical standards
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.American Cancer Society. Cancer treatment and survivorship facts & figures 2014–2015. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2014.Google Scholar
- 7.National alliance for caregiving in collaboration with AARP. 2015 report: caregiving in the U.S. Available at http://www.caregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/2015_CaregivingintheUS_Final-Report-June-4_WEB.pdf. Accessed July 6, 2015. June 2015.
- 10.Hanly P, Ceilleachair AO, Skally M, O’Leary E, Staines A, Kapur K, et al. Time costs associated with informal care for colorectal cancer: an investigation of the impact of alternative valuation methods. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(3):193–203. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0013-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Warner EL, Kirchhoff AC, Nam GE, Fluchel M. Financial burden of pediatric cancer for patients and their families. J Oncol Pract. 2014. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001495
- 20.MEPS-HC sample design and collection process. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Md. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/survey_comp/hc_data_collection.jsp
- 21.Willis, G., Yabroff, K.R., Liu, B., Wilson, M.K., Nutt, S., de Moor, J.S., Kent, E., Virgo, K., Ekwueme, D., & Rodriguez, J. (2015, May). A comparison of probability and non-probability samples. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Hollywood, FLGoogle Scholar
- 24.Arrossi S, Matos E, Zengarini N, Roth B, Sankaranayananan R, Parkin M. The socio-economic impact of cervical cancer on patients and their families in Argentina, and its influence on radiotherapy compliance. Results from a cross-sectional study. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105(2):335–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.12.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993.Google Scholar
- 29.Employee Benefits in the United States-March 2015. In: Bureau of Labor Statistics USDoL, editor.Google Scholar
- 30.5 U.S.C. 6331–6340.Google Scholar
- 31.5 CFR part 630, subpart I.Google Scholar
- 33.Affairs UDoV. VA Caregiver Support http://www.caregiver.va.gov/support/support_services.asp. Accessed October 8 2015.