Changes in importance of work and vocational satisfaction during the 2 years after breast cancer surgery and factors associated with this
- 432 Downloads
The purpose of this study is to investigate how women, during the 2 years following breast cancer surgery, rate importance of work and vocational satisfaction, and baseline factors associated with rating over time.
A prospective cohort study of 692 women aged 20–63 included about 4 weeks after a first breast cancer surgery. Register data on treatment and data from six repeated questionnaires during a 2-year follow-up (at baseline, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24 months) were used in two-way mixed repeated analysis of variance and mixed repeated measures analysis of covariance.
The women rated importance of work (m = 3.74; sd 0.88) (maximum 5) and vocational satisfaction (m = 4.30; sd 1.38) (maximum 6) high during the 2 years. Women with planned chemotherapy rated lower vocational satisfaction and especially so at 4 months after inclusion (F 1, 498 = 8.20; p = 0.004). Higher age, better physical, and mental/social work ability at baseline influenced rating of vocational satisfaction. Supportive colleagues was an important covariate that significantly affected ratings of importance of work as well as vocational satisfaction, i.e., women with better support rated on average higher on these outcomes. The effect of chemotherapy disappeared after including the abovementioned baseline covariates.
Women diagnosed with breast cancer in the following 2 years rate importance of work and vocational satisfaction high, which are associated to lower work ability and social support.
Implications for cancer survivors
Work is a very important aspect in life also after a cancer diagnosis, which has to be acknowledged when discussing treatment and rehabilitation plans with women with breast cancer. Furthermore, workplace support needs to be assessed as this is an influential factor.
KeywordsBreast cancer Work importance Vocational satisfaction Trajectory/change
The study was funded by the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Cancer Society, the Cancer Research Foundations of Radiumhemmet, and the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm, Sweden. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the regional research committee and with the 1967 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 12.Waddell G, Burton K. Is work good for your health and well-being? London: TSO; 2006.Google Scholar
- 15.Naus MJ, Rasch RL, Spitzmueller C, Bussell VA. Cancer survivors at work: job satisfaction at different phases of survivorship. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33:S56.Google Scholar
- 18.Saboonchi F, Petersson LM, Wennman-Larsen A, Alexanderson K, Brannstrom R, Vaez M. Changes in caseness of anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients during the first year following surgery: patterns of transiency and severity of the distress response. Eur J Oncol Nurs: Off J Eur Oncol Nurs Soc. 2014;18(6):598–604. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Dallner M, Gamberale F, Olsson A, Örelius D. Testing of a co-nordic questionnaire on psychological and social factors in work life, QPS Nordic: National Institutet for Working Life (Arbetslivsinstitutet)1999. Report No.: 1999:14.Google Scholar
- 25.Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A. Work ability index. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1998.Google Scholar
- 26.Arbetslivkohorten - Teknisk rapport 1 2005:8 (National Working Life Cohort—technical report 1) [in Swedish]. In: Arbetslivsrapport. National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm. 2005. Nile..lub.lu.se/arbarch/arb/2005/arb2005_08.pdf.Google Scholar
- 31.Skånér Y, Nilsson G, Arrelöv B, Lindholm C, Hinas E, Löfgren A, et al. Use and usefulness of guidelines for sickness certification: results from a national survey of all general practitioners in Sweden. BMJ Open. 2011;1(2):e000303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 37.Ono M, Ogilvie JM, Wilson JS, Green H, Chambers SK, Ownsworth T et al. A meta-analysis of cognitive impairment and decline associated with adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2015;5. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00059.