Journal of Cancer Survivorship

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 339–348 | Cite as

Body image in cancer survivors: a systematic review of case-control studies

  • Vicky Lehmann
  • Mariët Hagedoorn
  • Marrit A. Tuinman
Review

Abstract

Purpose

There is common consensus that cancer and its treatment can impair the body, but combined evidence of the previous literature in cancer survivors is missing. Therefore, we reviewed body image in cancer survivors and focused on case-control studies, in order to draw conclusions as to whether body image might be altered due to cancer.

Methods

Medline, Cinahl, Embase, and PsycInfo were searched and after duplicate extraction, 1932 hits were retrieved and screened for eligibility. Included studies were rated on selection, measurement, and reporting bias.

Results

Twenty-five studies were identified using 19 different scales to measure body image. Ten studies reported a more negative body image in survivors, nine found no differences, three reported mixed findings, and three reported a more positive body image in survivors. Potential bias was common and 16 studies had at least three sources of potential bias. Less-biased studies (i.e., ≤2 sources of bias) hinted to weak differences between survivors and controls, favoring healthy controls. A meta-analysis could not be performed.

Conclusions

This review was long overdue and indicates a somewhat more negative body image in cancer survivors than healthy controls. However, numerous problems potentially biasing study results have been detected and firm conclusions cannot be drawn.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Future studies should recruit larger samples, match samples, and pay attention to how body image is conceptualized and measured in order to draw reliable conclusions as to whether body image is impaired in cancer survivors.

Keywords

Systematic review Body image Cancer survivors Case-control studies 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare to have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Fang SY, Shu BC, Chang YJ. The effect of breast reconstruction surgery on body image among women after mastectomy: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137:13–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McGaughey A. Body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: an integrative literature review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006;51:e45–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Somani BK, Gimlin D, Fayers P, N'Dow J. Quality of life and body image for bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion—a prospective cohort study with a systematic review of literature. Urology. 2009;74:1138–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fingeret MC, Yuan Y, Urbauer D, Weston J, Nipomnick S, Weber R. The nature and extent of body image concerns among surgically treated patients with head and neck cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2012;21:836–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baati I, Mnif L, Masmoudi J, Allouche C, Damak R, Halwani N, et al. Psychological impact of chemotherapy induced alopecia. Eur Psychiatry. 2010;25:S-869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McClement S. Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: psychological effect on the patient and family. J Wound Ostomy Cont. 2005;32:264–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lemieux J, Maunsell E, Provencher L. Chemotherapy-induced alopecia and effects on quality of life among women with breast cancer: a literature review. Psycho-Oncology. 2008;17:317–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Waskul DD, van der Riet P. The abject embodiment of cancer patients: dignity, selfhood, and the grotesque body. Symb Interact. 2002;25:487–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Snobohm C, Friedrichsen M, Heiwe S. Experiencing one’s body after a diagnosis of cancer—a phenomenological study of young adults. Psycho-Oncology. 2010;19:863–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ervik B, Asplund K. Dealing with a troublesome body: a qualitative interview study of men’s experiences living with prostate cancer treated with endocrine therapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16:103–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Calogero RM, Thompson JK. Gender and body image. In: Chrisler J, McCreary D, editors. Handbook of gender research in psychology. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 153–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cash TF, Pruzinsky T. Future challenges for body image theory, research, and clinical practice. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T, editors. Body image: a handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York: The Guilford; 2002. p. 509–16.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thompson JK, Heinberg LJ, Altabe M, Tantleff-Dunn S. Exacting beauty: theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington: American Psychological Association; 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thompson JK. The (mis) measurement of body image: ten strategies to improve assessment for applied and research purposes. Body Image. 2004;1:7–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    White CA. Body images in oncology. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T, editors. Body image: a handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York: The Guilford; 2002. p. 379–86.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cash TF, Pruzinsky T. Understanding body images. Historical and contemporary perspectives. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T, editors. Body image: a handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York: The Guilford; 2004. p. 3–12.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bolte S, Zebrack B. Sexual issues in special populations: adolescents and young adults. Sem Onc Nurs. 2008;24:115–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peplau LA, Frederick DA, Yee C, Maisel N, Lever J, Ghavami N. Body image satisfaction in heterosexual, gay, and lesbian adults. Arch Sex Behav. 2009;38:713–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:W-65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ahn SH, Park BW, Noh DY, Nam SJ, Lee ES, Lee MK, et al. Health-related quality of life in disease-free survivors of breast cancer with the general population. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:173–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sprangers M, Groenvold M, Arraras JI, Franklin J, te Velde A, Muller M, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2756–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blackmore C. The impact of orchidectomy upon the sexuality of the man with testicular cancer. Cancer Nurs. 1988;11:33–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N. The DSFI: a multidimensional measure of sexual functioning. J Sex Marital Ther. 1979;5:244–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boehmer U, Timm A, Ozonoff A, Potter J. Explanatory factors of sexual function in sexual minority women breast cancer survivors. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2873–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Franzoi SL, Shields SA. The body esteem scale: multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population. J Pers Assess. 1984;48:173–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bukovic D, Fajdic J, Strinic T, Habek M, Hojsak I, Radakovc N. Differences in sexual functioning between patients with benign and malignant breast tumors. Coll Antropol. 2004;28 Suppl 2:191–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Calaminus G, Weinspach S, Teske C, Göbel U. Quality of life in children and adolescents with cancer. First results of an evaluation of 49 patients with the PEDQOL questionnaire. Klin Padiatr. 2000;212:211–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Calaminus G, Weinspach S, Teske C, Göbel U. Quality of survival in children and adolescents after treatment for childhood cancer: the influence of reported late effects on health related quality of life. Klin Padiatr. 2007;219:152–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cohen M, Mabjish AA, Zidan J. Comparison of Arab breast cancer survivors and healthy controls for spousal relationship, body image, and emotional distress. Qual Life Res. 2011;20:191–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gray SH. Social aspects of body image: perception of normalcy of weight and affect of college undergraduates. Percept Mot Skills. 1977;45:1035–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Falk Dahl CA, Reinertsen KV, Nesvold I, Fosså SD, Dahl AA. A study of body image in long-term breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2010;116:3549–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hopwood P, Fletcher I, Lee A, Al Ghazal S. A body image scale for use with cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:189–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Katre C, Johnson IA, Humphris GM, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Assessment of problems with appearance, following surgery for oral and oro-pharyngeal cancer using the University of Washington appearance domain and the Derriford appearance scale. Oral Oncol. 2008;44:927–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Carr T, Moss T, Harris D. The DAS24: a short form of the Derriford appearance scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10:285–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kriss RT, Kraemer HC. Efficacy of group therapy for problems with postmastectomy self-perception, body image, and sexuality. J Sex Res. 1986;22:438–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jourard SM. An exploratory study of body accessibility. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1966;5:221–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee SS, Chung HY, Yu W. Quality of life of long-term survivors after a distal subtotal gastrectomy. Cancer Res Treat. 2010;42:130–4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vickery C, Blazeby J, Conroy T, Arraras J, Sezer O, Koller M, et al. Development of an EORTC disease-specific quality of life module for use in patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:966–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liavaag AH, Dørum A, Bjøro T, Oksefjell H, Fosså SD, Tropé C, et al. A controlled study of sexual activity and functioning in epithelial ovarian cancer survivors. A therapeutic approach. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108:348–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Madan-Swain A, Brown RT, Sexson SB, Baldwin K, Pais R, Ragab A. Adolescent cancer survivors. Psychosocial and familial adaptation. Psychosomatics. 1994;35:453–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Millon T, Green CJ, Meagher RB. Millon adolescent personality inventory (MAPI). Minneapolis: National Computer Systems; 1982.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Maggiolini A, Grassi R, Adamoli L, Corbetta A, Charmet GP, Provantini K, et al. Self-image of adolescent survivors of long-term childhood leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2000;22:417–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Offer LD, Ostrov E, Howard KI. The offer self-image questionnaire for adolescents: a manual. Chicago: Michael Reese Hospital; 1982.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Moadel AB, Ostroff JS, Lesko LM, Bajorunas DR. Psychosexual adjustment among women receiving hormone replacement therapy for premature menopause following cancer treatment. Psycho-Oncology. 1995;4:273–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Molassiotis A, van den Akker OB, Milligan DW, Boughton BJ. Gonadal function and psychosexual adjustment in male long-term survivors of bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;16:253–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mumma GH, Mashberg D, Lesko LM. Long-term psychosexual adjustment of acute leukemia survivors: impact of marrow transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1992;14:43–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Park SY, Bae D, Nam JH, Park CT, Cho C, Lee JM, et al. Quality of life and sexual problems in disease-free survivors of cervical cancer compared with the general population. Cancer. 2007;110:2716–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Greimel ER, Kuljanic Vlasic K, Waldenstrom A, Duric VM, Jensen PT, Singer S, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality-of-life questionnaire cervical cancer module. Cancer. 2006;107:1812–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pendley JS, Dahlquist LM, Dreyer Z. Body image and psychosocial adjustment in adolescent cancer survivors. J Pediatr Psychol. 1997;22:29–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Penman DT, Bloom JR, Fotopoulos S, Cook MR, Holland JC, Gates C, et al. The impact of mastectomy on self-concept and social function: a combined cross-sectional and longitudinal study with comparison groups. Women Health. 1986;11:101–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Polivy J. Psychological effects of mastectomy on a woman’s feminine self-concept. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1977;164:77–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Berscheid E, Hatfield E, Bohrnstedt G. Body image. Psychol Today. 1972;6:57–66.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Puukko LR, Sammallahti PR, Siimes MA, Aalberg VA. Childhood leukemia and body image: interview reveals impairment not found with a questionnaire. J Clin Psychol. 1997;53:133–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Reaby LL, Hort LK, Vandervord J. Body image, self-concept, and self-esteem in women who had a mastectomy and either wore an external breast prosthesis or had breast reconstruction and women who had not experienced mastectomy. Health Care Women Int. 1994;15:361–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sabiston CM, Rusticus S, Brunet J, McDonough MH, Hadd V, Hubley AM, et al. Invariance test of the multidimensional body self-relations questionnaire: do women with breast cancer interpret this measure differently? Qual Life Res. 2010;19:1171–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Cash TF. The multidimensional body self-relations questionnaire user’s manual. Available from: www.body-images.com, accessed: 2013.
  57. 57.
    Sertoz OO, Doganavsargil O, Elbi H. Body image and self-esteem in somatizing patients. Psychiatr Clin Neurosci. 2009;63:508–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Secord PF, Jourard SM. The appraisal of body-cathexis: body-cathexis and the self. J Consult Psychol. 1953;17:343–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Trninic Z, Vidacak A, Vrhovac J, Petrov B, Setka V. Quality of life after colorectal cancer surgery in patients from University Clinical Hospital Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Coll Antropol. 2009;33 Suppl 2:1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sprangers M, Te Velde A, Aaronson N. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:238–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Romano J, Kromrey JD, Coraggio J, Skowronek J. Appropriate statistics for ordinal level data: should we really be using t-test and Cohen’sd for evaluating group differences on the NSSE and other surveys? Annu Meet Fla Assoc Inst Res. 2006;02:1–33.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Baker KS, Gurney JG, Ness KK, Bhatia R, Forman SJ, Francisco L, et al. Late effects in survivors of chronic myeloid leukemia treated with hematopoietic cell transplantation: results from the Bone Marrow Transplant Survivor Study. Blood. 2004;104:1898–906.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Naylor CD. The case for failed meta-analyses. J Eval Clin Pract. 1995;1:127–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vicky Lehmann
    • 1
  • Mariët Hagedoorn
    • 1
  • Marrit A. Tuinman
    • 1
  1. 1.Health Psychology Section, Department of Health SciencesUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG)GroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations