The Concerns About Recurrence Questionnaire: validation of a brief measure of fear of cancer recurrence amongst Danish and Australian breast cancer survivors
- 1.2k Downloads
Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is prevalent amongst survivors, and breast cancer survivors are particularly vulnerable. Currently, there are few well-validated brief measures of FCR and none specific to breast cancer. This manuscript describes the development and initial validation of a new measure of FCR for breast cancer survivors, the Concerns about Recurrence Questionnaire (CARQ), and reports its initial validation in an Australian and Danish population-based sample of breast cancer survivors.
CTT analyses explored scale reliability and validity; Rasch analyses explored model fit statistics, item bias (DIF) and local dependency. Three-item, four-item and five-item versions were considered.
Two hundred eighteen Australian women aged 28–45 years diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer (stages 0–2) and 2001 Danish women diagnosed with breast cancer (stages 1–3) aged 26–70 completed the CARQ. Based on the results of both CTT and IRT analyses, the four-item English version of the scale performed best. Although the CTT analyses suggested that the CARQ-4 was reliable and valid in both samples, Rasch analyses identified item bias relative to age, and local dependence which may be remedied by further scale development.
The CARQ-4 English version is currently one of the most rigorously tested brief scales of FCR available.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
The availability of more valid and reliable brief measures of FCR will help to promote research and screening of FCR amongst cancer survivors.
KeywordsCancer Oncology Fear of recurrence Psychological assessment Measurement scale
B. Thewes was supported by a National Breast Cancer Post-Doctoral Research Fellowship. This study was funded by a Union for International Cancer Control Yamagiwa-Yoshida International Cancer Grant. P. Butow was supported by a NH&MRC Research Fellowship Award. We also wish to thank the Danish Cancer Society for financial support (PP05020) and the Danish Breast cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) for providing the clinical data for the Danish sample.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
- 4.Thewes B, Boyes A, Girgis A. Fear of cancer recurrence in the first year after diagnosis; results of a registry based study. Quebec: 12th World Congress of International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS); 2010.Google Scholar
- 16.Simard S, Savard J. Screening and psychiatric comorbidity of clinical fear of cancer recurrence. Vancouver: 4th Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance Reasons for Hope Scientific Conference; 2008.Google Scholar
- 18.Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. 2nd ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995.Google Scholar
- 20.Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count, and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Naval Air Station Memphis, TN; 1975.Google Scholar
- 22.Smith EV, Smith RM. Introduction to Rasch measurement. Maple Grove: JAM Press; 2004.Google Scholar
- 23.Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M. The Rasch model for dichotomous items. In: Rasch models in health. London: ISTE Ltd, Wiley; 2013. p. 5–26.Google Scholar
- 25.Kreiner S, Nielsen T. Item analysis in DIGRAM 3.04. Part I: Guided tours. Research report 2013/06. Copenhagen 2013.Google Scholar
- 26.Nielsen T, Kreiner S. Improving items that do not fit the Rasch model: exemplified with the physical functioning scale of the SF-36. Ann Inst Stat Univ Paris Publ Inst Stat’Univ Paris. 2013;57(1–2):91–110.Google Scholar
- 30.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc. 1995;57:289–300.Google Scholar
- 32.Kreiner S, Christensen KB. Validity and objectivity in health related summated scales: analysis by graphical loglinear Rasch models. In: von Davuer M, Carstensen C, editors. Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models—extensions and applications. New York: Springer Verlag; 2006.Google Scholar
- 37.Curran D, van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK, et al. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC trial 10801. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (BCCG). Eur J Cancer. 1998;34(3):307–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Lebel S, Beattie S, Arès I, Bielajew C. Young and worried: age and fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors. Health Psychol. 2012.Google Scholar
- 41.de Vaus DA. Analyzing social science data: 50 key problems in data analysis. London: Sage; 2002.Google Scholar
- 42.Nunnally J, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 1994.Google Scholar
- 43.Traub RE. Reliability for the social sciences: theory and applications. London: Sage; 1994.Google Scholar
- 44.Loundsbury J, Gibson L, Saudargas R, et al. Scale development. In: The psychology research handbook: a guide for graduate students and research assistants. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2006.Google Scholar