Journal of Cancer Survivorship

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 211–218 | Cite as

Effectiveness of treatment summaries in increasing breast and colorectal cancer survivors’ knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment

  • Mary Jo Nissen
  • Michaela L. Tsai
  • Anne H. Blaes
  • Karen K. Swenson
  • Susan Koering



Previous research has identified gaps in cancer survivors’ knowledge of their diagnosis and treatment. This study assessed the effect of treatment summaries on survivors’ accuracy in reporting details of diagnosis and treatment.


Written surveys were completed by 203 breast cancer survivors and 141 colorectal cancer survivors diagnosed between 1999 and 2008 at a cancer center in the Minneapolis, MN, area (78 % response rate). All completed the survey before and again 17 months after receiving a treatment summary, which was sent to them upon request. Accuracy of response at each assessment was compared to cancer registry and medical records.


Both breast and colorectal cancer survivors showed significant improvement in accuracy on stage of disease, and breast cancer survivors showed significant improvement in accuracy on morphology, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, receipt of hormone therapy, and receipt of doxorubicin after receiving the treatment summary. Breast cancer survivors and older individuals were more likely than colorectal cancer survivors or younger individuals to indicate that they used the treatment summary in completing the second survey. Even for items on which accuracy improved significantly, however, patient knowledge remained incomplete.


The provision of treatment summaries can improve cancer survivors’ knowledge of details about their diagnosis and treatment.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Treatment summaries can meet the specific goal of increasing patient knowledge. Their effectiveness might be greater if presented during a dedicated survivorship health care appointment.


Treatment summaries Health knowledge Patient education Survivorship Breast neoplasms Colorectal neoplasms 



This project was funded by Park Nicollet Foundation.


  1. 1.
    President’s Cancer Panel, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute: Living beyond cancer: finding a new balance. (2004). Accessed 15 Aug 2012.
  2. 2.
    Hewitt ME, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington: The National Academies; 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology: Chemotherapy treatment plan and summary. (2012). Accessed 15 Aug 2012.
  4. 4.
    American Cancer Society: Survivorship care plans. (2012). Accessed 15 Aug 2012.
  5. 5.
    LIVESTRONG: Develop my LIVESTRONG Care Plan. (2012). Accessed 15 Aug 2012.
  6. 6.
    Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring patient-centered care. (2012). Accessed 15 Aug 2012.
  7. 7.
    Hahn EE, Ganz PA. Survivorship programs and care plans in practice: variations on a theme. J Oncol Practice. 2011;7(2):70–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS. Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5117–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kantsiper M, McDonald EL, Geller G, Schockney L, Snyder C, Wolff AC. Transitioning to breast cancer survivorship: perspectives of patients, cancer specialists, and primary care providers. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24 Suppl 2:459–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burg MA, Lopez EDS, Dailey A, Keller ME, Prendergast B. The potential of survivorship care plans in primary care follow-up of minority breast cancer patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24 Suppl 2:467–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller R. Implementing a survivorship care plan for patients with breast cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(3):479–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baravelli C, Krishnasamy M, Pezaro C, Schofield P, Lotfi-Jam K, Rogers M, Milne D, Aranda S, King D, Shaw B, et al. The views of bowel cancer survivors and health care professionals regarding survivorship care plans and post treatment follow up. J Cancer Surviv. 2009;3(2):99–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Watson EK, Sugden EM, Rose PW. Views of primary care physicians and oncologists on cancer follow-up initiatives in primary care: an online survey. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(2):159–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shalom MM, Hahn EE, Casillas J, Ganz PA. Do survivorship care plans make a difference? A primary care provider perspective. J Oncol Practice. 2011;7(5):314–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grunfeld E, Julian JA, Pond G, Maunsell E, Coyle D, Folkes A, Joy AA, Provencher L, Rayson D, Rheaume DE, Porter GA, Paszat LF, Pritchard KI, Robidoux A, Smith S, Sussman J, Dent S, Sisler J, Wiernikowski J, Levine MN. Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized, clinical trial of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4755–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stricker CT, Jacobs LA, Palmer SC. Survivorship care plans: an argument for evidence over common sense. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(12):1392–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jefford M, Schofield P, Emery J. Improving survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(12):1391–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith TJ, Snyder C. Is it time for (Survivorship Care) Plan B? J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4740–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stricker CT, Jacobs LA, Risendal B, Jones A, Panzer S, Ganz PA, Syrjala KL, McCabe MS, Baker KS, Miller K, Casillas J, Rosenstein DL, Campbell M, Palmer SC. Survivorship care planning after the Institute of Medicine recommendations: how are we faring? J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5(4):358–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maunsell E, Drolet M, Ouhoummane N, Robert J. Breast cancer survivors accurately reported key treatment and prognostic characteristics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:364–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phillips KA, Milne RL, Buys S, Friedlander ML, Ward JH, McCredie MRE, Giles GG, Hopper JL. Agreement between self-reported breast cancer treatment and medical records in a population-based breast cancer family registry. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(21):4679–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schootman M, Jeffe DB, West MM, Aft R. Self-report by elderly breast cancer patients was an acceptable alternative to surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) abstract data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:1316–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yen TWF, Sparapani RA, Guo C, Neuner JM, Laud PW, Nattinger AB. Elderly breast cancer survivors accurately self-report key treatment information. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;59(2):410–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu Y, Diamant AL, Thind A, Maly RC. Validity of self-reports of breast cancer treatment in low-income, medically underserved women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119(3):745–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clegg LX, Potosky AL, Harlan LC, Hankey BF, Hoffman RM, Stanford JL, Hamilton AS. Comparison of self-reported initial treatment with medical records: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. Amer J Epidemiol. 2001;154(6):582–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nissen MJ, Tsai ML, Blaes AH, Swenson KK. Breast and colorectal cancer survivors’ knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6(1):20–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mertens WC, Loke C, Katz D, Barham R, Makari-Judson G. Recalling breast cancer presentation and therapy: associations between patient inaccuracy and demographic characteristics. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29 Suppl Abstr 9067. Presented at the Annual ASCO meeting, Chicago, IL. June 2011.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Friedman WF. Memory for the time of past events. Psych Bulletin. 1993;113:44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Services Res. 2004;39:1005–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Malin JL, Kahn KL, Adams J, Kwan L, Laouri M, Ganz PA. Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:835–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cress RD, Zaslavsky AM, West DW, Wolf RE, Felter MC, Ayanian JZ. Completeness of information on adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer in population-based cancer registries. Med Care. 2003;41:1006–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Jo Nissen
    • 1
  • Michaela L. Tsai
    • 1
  • Anne H. Blaes
    • 2
  • Karen K. Swenson
    • 1
  • Susan Koering
    • 3
  1. 1.Oncology Research DepartmentPark Nicollet InstituteMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Division of Hematology/Oncology/TransplantationUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Methodist Hospital Cancer RegistryPark Nicollet Health ServicesMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations